Sociopath Community

You always talk about what you wish you had and how awful Capitalism is.

From my POV it makes it look like you're a victim of Wealth Envy. 

Turncoat said: 

You always talk about what you wish you had and how awful Capitalism is.

From my POV it makes it look like you're a victim of Wealth Envy. 

 You're the one that attacked rich people. (As I point out, nobody is really different from rich people in mannerisms and beliefs.)

Notice how you defend capitalism but attack rich people. 

Tacky said: 

Turncoat said: 

You always talk about what you wish you had and how awful Capitalism is.

From my POV it makes it look like you're a victim of Wealth Envy. 

You're the one that attacked rich people. (As I point out, nobody is really different from rich people in mannerisms and beliefs.)

Not for being rich, but for being people. 

Notice how you defend capitalism but attack rich people. 

I don't really see how I'm defending it so much as not seeing the merit behind your point. It's not like everything's divided into only two camps, there's definitely problems with any system, but you seem more fixated on this particular one while also talking about the things you wish you could afford. 

I actually really don't split things into two camps, you just like to be accusatory.

Tacky said: 

I actually really don't split things into two camps, you just like to be accusatory.

Then why do you see it as me defending a side, rather than questioning your perspective? 

Turncoat said: 

Tacky said: 

I actually really don't split things into two camps, you just like to be accusatory.

Then why do you see it as me defending a side, rather than questioning your perspective? 

 "questioning your perspective" can be seen as accusatory.

Buttered Toast said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tacky said: 

I actually really don't split things into two camps, you just like to be accusatory.

Then why do you see it as me defending a side, rather than questioning your perspective? 

 "questioning your perspective" can be seen as accusatory.

Accusing is more like attacking than defending, isn't it? 

Is this Tacky admitting he's secretly rich? 

Notice how you defend capitalism but attack rich people.

On the whole, Tacky seems defensive more often than not.  But "questioning" is still soft-talk for accusations.  It means there are implications behind the questions.

There are definite statements being made not just questions. 

I think it's really hard to explain to a neurotypical or anyone with mainstream beliefs that all of the classes have disparity and show interest in maintaining power and influence once they realize how things could make them lose control.