I always see normies claim that autists are heartless. Autists have to deal with the way society treats them and a job market centered around neurotypicals. Neurotypicals on the other hand, have almost everything handed to them, and yet they still complain when they know they are above a lot of other people they don't actually give a fuck about because to them, if other people had equality, it means they would lose power. Neurotypicals more often are the real "empathy-less" ones that just see everything in the world as something to fuck and throw away until they are ready to settle down. They have zero shame in being opportunists that easily rationalize everything fucked up they do or say or don't do. Even if I believe a neurotypical in something they say that seems just and fair, they tend to contradict themselves without realizing it or just not caring, or even playing victim.
If you look at the brain synapses of a neurotypical, it's a lot like a psychopath who are both wayyy different from an autistic brain.
People tend to focus more on the bad than the good, then make general statements as a way to externalize what about themselves lends to the same problems time and time again as loops.
'Heartless autism' tends to apply moreover those of lower empathic ranges, and how much they self-direct tends to drive that point home. They often struggle to put themselves in another's shoes, spending the majority of their conversations talking only about their own interests rather than trying to visit another's.
People tend to focus more on the bad than the good, then make general statements as a way to externalize what about themselves lends to the same problems time and time again as loops.
'Heartless autism' tends to apply moreover those of lower empathic ranges, and how much they self-direct tends to drive that point home. They often struggle to put themselves in another's shoes.
I'd say the ability to "put yourself in someone else's shoes" has not led to equality if anything it has fought against it. In my opinion equality is the greatest expression of empathy as it has a more truthful outcome helping people in reality instead of self-gratification.
How does struggling with relating to people oppose inequality? Wouldn't it take the room to understand others in order to figure what would be best for all, rather than just the individual?
How does struggling with relating to people oppose inequality? Wouldn't it take the room to understand others in order to figure what would be best for all, rather than just the individual?
That easily leads to classism.
How does struggling with relating to people oppose inequality? Wouldn't it take the room to understand others in order to figure what would be best for all, rather than just the individual?
That easily leads to classism.
You see the rich as concerned for their fellow man, rather than victims of affluenza?
How does struggling with relating to people oppose inequality? Wouldn't it take the room to understand others in order to figure what would be best for all, rather than just the individual?
That easily leads to classism.
You see the rich as concerned for their fellow man, rather than victims of affluenza?
People are all talk but they don't like actual change. Just convenient change. It's why they fantasize about outsurviving an apocalypse or some shit while all the sheeple are just pping themselves.
That easily leads to classism.
You see the rich as concerned for their fellow man, rather than victims of affluenza?
People are all talk but they don't like actual change. Just convenient change. It's why they fantasize about outsurviving an apocalypse or some shit while all the sheeple are just pping themselves.
Why would a lack of empathy lend less to classism though? If anything that'd enable it, and from more than just the upper crust.
I figured people tended to fantasize about apocalyptic scenarios over feeling like it'd give them more control over their lives and their environment when compared to the lives we lead now. A lot of them fantasize being leaders and see no means of doing so within these constraints.
I always see normies claim that autists are heartless. Autists have to deal with the way society treats them and a job market centered around neurotypicals. Neurotypicals on the other hand, have almost everything handed to them, and yet they still complain when they know they are above a lot of other people they don't actually give a fuck about because to them, if other people had equality, it means they would lose power. Neurotypicals more often are the real "empathy-less" ones that just see everything in the world as something to fuck and throw away until they are ready to settle down. They have zero shame in being opportunists that easily rationalize everything fucked up they do or say or don't do. Even if I believe a neurotypical in something they say that seems just and fair, they tend to contradict themselves without realizing it or just not caring, or even playing victim.
If you look at the brain synapses of a neurotypical, it's a lot like a psychopath who are both wayyy different from an autistic brain.
Lmao what the fuck did I just read?