To Palepeach's point, a lot of what I read on the Internet about empaths sounded almost like magic. It's used differently as a clinical term and colloquially.
Colloquially, most of the layperson articles started with something like "How can you tell that you're an empath, which is basically a superpower? Look for these 17 signs to know for sure." And then I was met with stuff from Harry Potter. Weird mix of astrology, psychology, and the supernatural.
The clinical usage is something like if you're at far enough on the sliding scale, then we categorize you as an empath. Personally, I find the Harry Potter definition more exciting.
On that, I have to ask, is She Aubrieta? I read about Heyoka empaths. I was going to dismiss it at first because the energy vibration thing was so far out there, but I realized that a lot of what she says connects with my vocabulary for another subject where I struggle to find the right words, so I'd be a bit hypocritical then to dismiss it. If I let myself be a bit less scientific, maybe a lot of these experiences of spiritual phenomena relate to some human experience that is difficult to put into words. I think building language around it certainly helps as long as the language and the experiences are shared.
I've some notion of 'energy vibrations' but I can only imagine what it means. For me, that would be a proxy for a person's mood and I imagine that after focusing on those vibrations long enough my brain would naturally start to see patterns, like meta vibrations and more complicated shapes, which would help me simplify the process. Maybe we can explain all these spiritual phenomena with science.
I imagine all this empath phenomenology is in the end for the good of society. I do the same thing as that empath practice, but with other things.. Believing you can do something ironically makes it possible.