Marxist overthrow starts by undermining the values and norms of the targeted society.
Cultures are destroyed, men are turned to women, race wars are started, mass immigration, allow crime to go unpunished, implement chaos. Forced poverty, medical control, food control. Stoke divisiveness.
Demoralization.
Destabilization.
Crisis.
Normalization.
Any of this look familiar?
Imagine people thinking crime goes unpunished. It’s just the reformation of law and it isn’t anybody’s fault it’s just becoming common law. Petty larceny and all drugs go decriminalized in certain places and the whole country goes into a loop. Go figure.
Imagine people thinking crime goes unpunished. It’s just the reformation of law and it isn’t anybody’s fault it’s just becoming common law. Petty larceny and all drugs go decriminalized in certain places and the whole country goes into a loop. Go figure.
You just have to donate to the Democratic party and join the club. Just look at Hunter Biden, antifa and BLM. If you further the Marxist cause you go unpunished. There is a huge bias in the justice system you just have to be "in".
VIRAL ANTI-MARRIAGE TIKTOK LOOKS LIKE CHINESE DEEPFAKE, TIKTOK IS BRAINWASHING YOUR KIDS
The Maoist cultural revolution. Destroy the family so that the "State" becomes the only form of support.
Marriage and children should be looked at as the greatest gift. Passing on your genetics is only for the superior. Darwin's theory.
Darwinism is for psuedo-intellectual who usually don't even know much about Darwin's works.
No fault marriage makes sense as to why people don't want to get married as the only commitment to marriage is an absurd contract meant to punish one of the partners which is typically the male. The partner that makes less can decide to get a divorce or would have custody of the children for being the mother and getting an extreme amount of money based upon income instead of need or actual support for the children. If the alimony received ends up making more money it might not even make a change if it does in the first place because of court bias or court neglect.
I support gay marriage but no fault marriage just has too many consequences that I honestly think it is worse than the consequences of being stuck in a marriage.
Civil Unions could remain no fault for those that want an alternative option.
Darwinism is for psuedo-intellectual who usually don't even know much about Darwin's works.
No fault marriage makes sense as to why people don't want to get married as the only commitment to marriage is an absurd contract meant to punish one of the partners which is typically the male. The partner that makes less can decide to get a divorce or would have custody of the children for being the mother and getting an extreme amount of money based upon income instead of need or actual support for the children. If the alimony received ends up making more money it might not even make a change if it does in the first place because of court bias or court neglect.
I support gay marriage but no fault marriage just has too many consequences that I honestly think it is worse than the consequences of being stuck in a marriage.
Civil Unions could remain no fault for those that want an alternative option.
The strong will survive and breed.
The biggest simplification of biology ever. Tell what it means to be strong in a given environment? Do you think only body builders are reproducing? Or do you recognize that economy minded people have a "stronger" chance at reproduction? What happens when systems collapse? Will body building be as viable, will the economist be as viable?
Marriage and children should be looked at as the greatest gift. Passing on your genetics is only for the superior. Darwin's theory.
"Survival of The Fittest" has a way of turning so-called superior traits and intelligence into a weakness once you filter it through Darwin. He looks at it as a matter of quantity over quality, having lots of kids rather than a few with the perfect life.
Darwin's model of success in a human being rewards recklessness and sin, being loose enough to not hold back on babymaking. Marriage is not needed for others in the animal kingdom, and humans in that regard are no exception. It's more about accessibility of the genitals, it's so called 'higher thought' that tends to suppress the number of children produced.
Idiocracy captures the problem pretty well in their model:
The strong will survive and breed.
More like the gregarious will, I've seen some pretty devolved looking people pop out kids.
