Before I leave, let this be my final post.
After analysing the bodily composition of the female humans here, I have concluded that PalePeach is objectively the hottest. Let me expand on my logic in the following paragraphs, if I may.
Firstly, PalePeach is without a doubt above the American average in fitness. In her semi-nude bathroom photo, it was easy for me to discern that her BMI is somewhere in the "ideal" range. She has no visible defects, and an hourglass shaped body, which symbolizes the greek ideal and is pleasing to the eyes of the majority of the human population, and I would perhaps argue even beyond the human population, given how shapes in nature follow the fibonacci sequence and the golden ratio. My view on the female beauty is driven by science and the pursuit for perfection. For more information on the scientific view of human attractiveness, please see this wikipedia page and the references to the psychological studies therein [1].
However, it is plausible that another human female on this forum is even hotter than PalePeach. Nevertheless, a statistical analysis and Bayesian logic drives me to believe this is not the case, although new evidence could plausibly convince me otherwise.
Indeed, consider the following facts:
1. We know, a posteriori, that PalePeach is significantly above average in her body composition and, while her face is of course not shown, scientific investigations into male preferences suggests that the facial composition and attractiveness is heavily correlated with bodily fat. Thus, presuming that her face is, at the very least, in the general category, Bayesian probabilistic analysis indicates that it is more probable that she has a hot face than not.
2. Most SC members of the fairer species here are Americans, and unfortunately a statistical analysis indicates that the average American is at least slightly obese. Though superficial, obesity is, unfortunately, correlated with unattractiveness, in the view of the average homo sapien.
3. We have not seen clear photos of most SC women, and thus we can only presume that the best guess for each female follows the American average (or the average of whatever nationality a given female possesses).
4. For the other photos that I have been presented with, they were not nudes, and thus it is difficult to judge and analyse the bodily composition. Thus, non-nude female humans go to category three.
Therefore, the Bayesian interpretation of the question is "what is the likelihood that PalePeach is the hottest woman on SC vs at least one of the other women are hotter"? More specifically, one may write down the probability that PalePeach is the hottest as:
P(PalePeach is the hottest) = P(PalePeach is not a catfish) P(PalePeach is hotter than other women|PalePeach is not a catfish).
To evaluate the probability that PalePeach is hotter than other women, given that she is not a catfish, is simply the probability that not one woman is hotter than her, which, for shorthand, we write as:
P(PalePeach is hotter than other women)=1-(1-P(A woman without a nude photo is hotter than PalePeach even though we haven't seen their nude photo))^N,
where N is the number of SC women. I would estimate that the probability that a randomly drawn female is hotter than PalePeach lies somewhere in the 0.1% range, and the probability that PalePeach is the hottest woman is almost 99% (if the number of SC females is 14), given that she is not a catfish.
More specifically, the likelihood ratio in favor of PalePeach being the hottest, neglecting catfish, is around 70. That is, it is 70 times more likely that PalePeach is the hottest than not.
However, I should note that there is a fatal flaw in this Bayesian estimate. In particular, should a female SC member post their nudes and turn out to be hotter than PalePeach, then Bayesian analysis would indicate that we need to re-calibrate our world view and accept that PalePeach is not the hottest on Earth. For this reason, I would recommend each female to post their nudes here in this thread for evaluation, such that we can have a more objective assessment.
Summary: In lieu of such objective assessment, the scientific process forces us to accept that PalePeach is the hottest at 99% probability, as a tentative best explanation favored by the data. However, she should prove that she is not a catfish, and other females should send their nudes, preferably uncovered photos, for a fair assessment.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness
