Sociopath Community

I find it interesting you only comment on one side of this relationship, have you not noticed chapo's inconsistent responses to med, how he leads her on, continues to play pokemon with her, and still meets up with her?

is it stalking if the person engages back? 

fluentes said: 

I find it interesting you only comment on one side of this relationship

I've commented on the other side of it too, typically when he's around. There's logs of the stuff he says too, as recently as a few days ago once he started going on about hitting nurses and deputies. The dude walks out of prison and starts going on about Pokemon cards, suing Apple for billions of dollars, and other strange things.

Meanwhile Med seems to be enabling this mindset of his, even when she recognizes what's wrong with it. She stifles her own questions over his functioning while she tries to take advantage of him during the confusion, and gets more aggressive about being called out for her stalking when she thinks she sees 'an opportunity'. When he's like this, he'll actually talk to her, so I think she likes when he's more psychotic or whatever's going on with him right now. There's also that financial vice grip, she noticed he's poor right now and is already going into Wedding daydreams, in the chat. 

She has also not given his autonomy much credit in the past by accusing his behavior of only changing because of 'other women'. If I would describe Med as anything, it's Predatory, and had it been over someone more sympathetic than Chapo I feel people would be expressing their concerns more openly. The dynamic is strange, especially when you consider how much she doesn't know the man of her affections. 

is it stalking if the person engages back? 

Yes, especially when you consider the entire narrative rather than what it became. 

If turq's posts are being consolidated for being too repetitive than these posts by Med should be consolidated as well.

PastelPink said: 

If turq's posts are being consolidated for being too repetitive than these posts by Med absolutely should be consolidated as well.

In all seriousness she doesn't tend to make a habit of this sort of thing, might as well let it breathe a little at least. 

Turncoat said: 

fluentes said: 

I find it interesting you only comment on one side of this relationship

I've commented on the other side of it too, typically when he's around. There's logs of the stuff he says too, as recently as a few days ago once he started going on about hitting nurses and deputies. The dude walks out of prison and starts going on about Pokemon cards, suing Apple for billions of dollars, and other strange things.

hmm, i wonder what his diagnosis is? maybe he's bi-polar too

Meanwhile Med seems to be enabling this mindset of his, even when she recognizes what's wrong with it. She stifles her own questions over his functioning while she tries to take advantage of him during the confusion, and gets more aggressive about being called out for her stalking when she thinks she sees 'an opportunity'. When he's like this, he'll actually talk to her, so I think she likes when he's more psychotic or whatever's going on with him right now. There's also that financial vice grip, she noticed he's poor right now and is already going into Wedding daydreams, in the chat. 

you know med's diagnosed with a severe illness, right? you know she's not consistently rational and is prone to delusional thinking. You seem to give chapo much more leeway, bordering on sympathy even, than you do her, even though she struggles a lot more with delusions. yeah, he's poor so how isn't he the asshole here for leading his supposed "stalker" on and taking advantage for money?? why the double standard

She has also not given his autonomy much credit in the past by accusing his behavior of only changing because of 'other women'. If I would describe Med as anything, it's Predatory, and had it been over someone more sympathetic than Chapo I feel people would be expressing their concerns more openly. The dynamic is strange, especially when you consider how much she doesn't know the man of her affections. 

is it stalking if the person engages back? 

Yes, especially when you consider the entire narrative rather than what it became. 

 I see it more as mutual benefit/destruction

fluentes said:

why the double standard

Chapo openly says stuff, then when asked questions addresses them weirdly frankly. It's less that nothing is said and more that he doesn't require as much repetition to hammer a point home. Conversations with him tend to hit some sort of closure, and for that matter lean more towards coherency. 

Med meanwhile stonewalls and behaves in a predatory fashion, then when questioned doesn't address things, gets conspiratorial over Chapo to the point of lashing out, or outright responds with attempts at doxxing people, then ends up surprised when people don't show her sympathy when it happens right back to her. She has demonstrated nasty behavior when it comes to even things like empathizing with her family, she's not really a good person once you get past sympathizing for her faculties. 

With disordered people, there's a point where you have to ask yourself who they'd be without the mental illness, or even compare them to others of similar disorderly traits, and then ask yourself if you do or don't like them as a person. Chapo, while child-like at points, has proven able to communicate with his issues being moreso over apathy with the concepts and some odd ego expressions, while Med's a straight up predator who lashes when questioned. 

It’s very clear that you favor Andrew. Why don’t you do some more bootlicking.

PokeMed said: 

It’s very clear that you favor Andrew. Why don’t you do some more bootlicking.

It's less favoring one so much as disfavoring the other.