Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 13 posts
0 votes

The 90s were peak


Posts: 160

Nowadays, there's kids as young as 6 with mobile phones. I can't go around the corner without seeing a Pride or Ukraine flag somewhere. Women hold the highest position in jobs because else it'd be sexist. There's war, there's inflation. Everyone's mentally ill in some way, and they have political agendas.

I miss the 90s when people would listen to rap and wear baggy clothes. People were more social and chill. Women were unironically likable; they didn't have huge egos like today. You could let your guard down and go with the flow. Life was better indeed.

last edit on 3/23/2023 7:01:46 PM
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak

I agree, today people are weak and I hate that.

everything is so pathetic. I ignore it, but when I think about it like rn, I get filled with contempt.

I don't care about the phones, or whatever. It is the mentality, it is neurotic, and defeatist, and people are so afraid of confrontations where they can be wrong.

 

 

Cheery bye!
Posts: 33411
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 

I agree, today people are weak and I hate that.

I'd say it's less weakness overall and moreso reduced Stoicism, people are more aware of one another and with it are more awakened to sympathetic sensitivities. 

You still have to be fairly strong to work without it, in some cases even stronger than a Stoic. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 

I agree, today people are weak and I hate that.

I'd say it's less weakness overall and moreso reduced Stoicism, people are more aware of one another and with it are more awakened to sympathetic sensitivities. 

You still have to be fairly strong to work without it, in some cases even stronger than a Stoic. 

are they really more aware? I am not so sure. The cancel culture is a great symptom of reduced empathy. Politically people will trust their side with extreme prejudice and never even imagine what it is like to be on the other side. I do not think that this is totally new and I am not even against it. What I am against is the reasons they do it: neurotic, and defeatist, and people are so afraid of confrontations where they can be wrong.

I think before all of those reasons were reduced. You cant even say nigger, because some brainwashed retard is too sensitive. A guy who beat a pregnant woman was killed by a cop, so he is a hero now. I see no value in freedom when it is misused. I am proud of humanity, but not of it in the last 10-15 years.

 

Cheery bye!
Posts: 33411
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 
Good said: 

I agree, today people are weak and I hate that.

I'd say it's less weakness overall and moreso reduced Stoicism, people are more aware of one another and with it are more awakened to sympathetic sensitivities. 

You still have to be fairly strong to work without it, in some cases even stronger than a Stoic. 

are they really more aware? I am not so sure.

The old idea of "Flash Mobs" from Myspace has expanded into a much larger monster of social change, and that could only be possible through increased interconnectivity. Aware does not have to mean accurate, it's more about their range of perception. Where before you needed to publish and distribute something physically, or arrange meetings, now you can do all of that in the palm of your hand on the go. 

With an increased feeling of watching others and feeling watched, people have changed when it comes to culture as a result. It was easier to feel tough in a more insulated space, now we can find complaints worldwide in a matter of seconds. 

Being 'strong' now comes with a different set of tools. As people find it easier to connect, tools related to interconnectivity are becoming more important, and it's why you can see people being more about 'empathy' and junk now compared to earlier punk movements. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 3/24/2023 10:48:24 AM
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 

I'd say it's less weakness overall and moreso reduced Stoicism, people are more aware of one another and with it are more awakened to sympathetic sensitivities. 

You still have to be fairly strong to work without it, in some cases even stronger than a Stoic. 

are they really more aware? I am not so sure.

The old idea of "Flash Mobs" from Myspace has expanded into a much larger monster of social change, and that could only be possible through increased interconnectivity. Aware does not have to mean accurate, it's more about their range of perception. Where before you needed to publish and distribute something physically, or arrange meetings, now you can do all of that in the palm of your hand on the go. 

With an increased feeling of watching others and feeling watched, people have changed when it comes to culture as a result. It was easier to feel tough in a more insulated space, now we can find complaints worldwide in a matter of seconds. 

Being 'strong' now comes with a different set of tools. As people find it easier to connect, tools related to interconnectivity are becoming more important, and it's why you can see people being more about 'empathy' and junk now compared to earlier punk movements. 

You are just explaining how they became weak ig? It is all I got from that.

I personally do not believe that you need to ever give any space to those sensitive pussy assholes. Even if you are a big company or brand or celeb. I do not 100% blame those that do, because I am not in their shoes to judge it 100% accurately. But I think you can oppose them(the triggered), while not getting canceled, if you are careful and smart.

 

But what would fully satisfy me on an emotional level is to see those people(the triggered) stripped naked, beaten, raped, and murdered in public. Yes, it would make me feel good.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 33411
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 
Good said: 

are they really more aware? I am not so sure.

The old idea of "Flash Mobs" from Myspace has expanded into a much larger monster of social change, and that could only be possible through increased interconnectivity. Aware does not have to mean accurate, it's more about their range of perception. Where before you needed to publish and distribute something physically, or arrange meetings, now you can do all of that in the palm of your hand on the go. 

With an increased feeling of watching others and feeling watched, people have changed when it comes to culture as a result. It was easier to feel tough in a more insulated space, now we can find complaints worldwide in a matter of seconds. 

Being 'strong' now comes with a different set of tools. As people find it easier to connect, tools related to interconnectivity are becoming more important, and it's why you can see people being more about 'empathy' and junk now compared to earlier punk movements. 

You are just explaining how they became weak ig? It is all I got from that.

You do not see strength in social relations, nor the ability to proliferate connections with peers rapidly? 

I personally do not believe that you need to ever give any space to those sensitive pussy assholes.

I wouldn't call people organizing a pussy strategy, especially if they start throwing bricks as a mob while dressed in identical clothing. 

Some groups do military militia training and junk too. 

Even if you are a big company or brand or celeb. I do not 100% blame those that do, because I am not in their shoes to judge it 100% accurately. But I think you can oppose them(the triggered), while not getting canceled, if you are careful and smart. 

I would argue that those who cannot adapt are weaker, rather than priding the inability. Standing alone is not strong in the modern world. 

Strength is now more about Charisma within newer constraints. If you cannot appeal to people these days, it is weakness. 

But what would fully satisfy me on an emotional level is to see those people(the triggered) stripped naked, beaten, raped, and murdered in public. Yes, it would make me feel good.

I'm sure many of them feel similarly over their perceived enemies, you and they both being fascistic. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 3/24/2023 7:19:03 PM
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak
Good said: 

The old idea of "Flash Mobs" from Myspace has expanded into a much larger monster of social change, and that could only be possible through increased interconnectivity. Aware does not have to mean accurate, it's more about their range of perception. Where before you needed to publish and distribute something physically, or arrange meetings, now you can do all of that in the palm of your hand on the go. 

With an increased feeling of watching others and feeling watched, people have changed when it comes to culture as a result. It was easier to feel tough in a more insulated space, now we can find complaints worldwide in a matter of seconds. 

Being 'strong' now comes with a different set of tools. As people find it easier to connect, tools related to interconnectivity are becoming more important, and it's why you can see people being more about 'empathy' and junk now compared to earlier punk movements. 

You are just explaining how they became weak ig? It is all I got from that.

You do not see strength in social relations, nor the ability to proliferate connections with peers rapidly? 

I dont see how i dont see that.

I personally do not believe that you need to ever give any space to those sensitive pussy assholes.

I wouldn't call people organizing a pussy strategy, especially if they start throwing bricks as a mob while dressed in identical clothing. 

Some groups do military militia training and junk too. 

It is not the being together issue, it is the why they are together. For pussy reasons.

Even if you are a big company or brand or celeb. I do not 100% blame those that do, because I am not in their shoes to judge it 100% accurately. But I think you can oppose them(the triggered), while not getting canceled, if you are careful and smart. 

I would argue that those who cannot adapt are weaker, rather than priding the inability. Standing alone is not strong in the modern world. 

Strength is now more about Charisma within newer constraints. If you cannot appeal to people these days, it is weakness. 

Then do so and stop the triggered, i dont see how this is an argument that does not align with my comment.

But what would fully satisfy me on an emotional level is to see those people(the triggered) stripped naked, beaten, raped, and murdered in public. Yes, it would make me feel good.

I'm sure many of them feel similarly over their perceived enemies, you and they both being fascistic. 

Good, maybe they are somewhat respectable.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 33411
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak

You seem pretty stuck in a singular idea of strength: Yours. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: The 90s were peak

You seem pretty stuck in a singular idea of strength: Yours. 

 naturally, if I thought of another idea of strength, I would adopt it, so it would be mine again.


 

Cheery bye!
10 / 13 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.