Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

PastelPink said: 

Allure said: 

2. I think Turquie should be removed from the site. Keeping her hurts us more than not adding a rule for point 1.

 you are giving Turquie more credit than she is due. Who is she chasing off, who has ever left because of her? You obvi can't stand her and you keep coming back.

If you check The Turquie Index, she has barely even been making topics lately. It's been under the count so I haven't even been hiding them. 

Delora said: 

I thought long and hard about my stance. Xadem and I were just talking and, I think I decided- i vote against condensing threads if it's anything like how turqs are condensed? A lot could go wrong with it. Like it could be abused so easily and do the website more harm than good.

Of course you change stances once it stands to target you next. 

 I didn't change my stance. I just didn't have one yet.

Turncoat said: 

Good said: 

Before we advertise I think we should change something. So the new ppl come here and have a better first impression.

I think we should change the rules to not have pedo talk

Does this include anti-pedo talk? 

That's like 9/10ths of it. 

and to move excessive spam to a spam category.

Then comes the "what is spam" question. 

 So you are not allowed to call out pedophiles anymore?

Friedrich said: 

I really think the issue is not that people are put off but that people don't come here. 

 Agreed 

We can get someone on dr.phil if we provide good post samples and all write to Dr. Phil separate letters about the situation 

Delora said: 

Turncoat said: 

PastelPink said: 

 you are giving Turquie more credit than she is due. Who is she chasing off, who has ever left because of her? You obvi can't stand her and you keep coming back.

If you check The Turquie Index, she has barely even been making topics lately. It's been under the count so I haven't even been hiding them. 

Delora said: 

I thought long and hard about my stance. Xadem and I were just talking and, I think I decided- i vote against condensing threads if it's anything like how turqs are condensed? A lot could go wrong with it. Like it could be abused so easily and do the website more harm than good.

Of course you change stances once it stands to target you next. 

 I actually didn't. I just remembered your kind of a dick and I think you would ruin the forum if you got to much power over it. If it was inq or good doing condensing I would be different about it. 

But it's you. 

And I don't trust you much.

My problem isn't with the rule tc. It's with you. I don't trust you. When rules are robotic rigid and inflexible you get the job done. 

When you have the room to get creative? Oh God I don't wanna know. 

I knew I was a potential target since the beginning of my stance also. So your logic is lacking here. 

Nothing as far as what you are saying has changed between my first opinion and the one now.

You are currently the worst spammer present on the forum, and only once it became obvious you'd be next did you even think about it. Even there, it took you a while to not act like hating Turquie was enough of a reason. 

If you do not like how it's being handled, then it is purely because you want someone who plays favorites, which is unprofessional. You were a big part of what even led to this round of Condensing towards Turquie by bumping a bunch of her topics, so don't act like you're somehow above guidelines and rules while enforcing them over people you hate. 

Delora said: 

We can get someone on dr.phil if we provide good post samples and all write to Dr. Phil separate letters about the situation 

Dr. Phil doesn't force people on, the participant would have to be willing. 

Delora said: 

 So you are not allowed to call out pedophiles anymore?

The current understanding is that it ruins the usability of the website. 

If people do not want to go to a pedophilic website, why would people spamming 'zomg pedo' be a good thing? 

Delora said: 

Good said: 

Delora said: 

 Maybe we should give this one more weekend when the traffic is higher to give people more.time,.and keep this thread bumped to the top of the page?

I dont know , maybe

 I'm getting nervous. People aren't voting.

 who else are you expecting to vote?

Friedrich said: 

I really think the issue is not that people are put off but that people don't come here. 

 this. Changing the site does nothing to improve traffic if there is no new traffic to see it.

PastelPink said: 

Friedrich said: 

I really think the issue is not that people are put off but that people don't come here. 

 this. Changing the site does nothing to improve traffic if there is no new traffic to see it.

But before we advertise, we should change the site so the new comers are not turned away. If there is anything to change that is. Maybe you are all right, idk.

PastelPink said: 

Delora said: 

Good said: 

I dont know , maybe

 I'm getting nervous. People aren't voting.

 who else are you expecting to vote?

 Sugar, Alice, TC, Alena. On the top of my head. However, we wont wait forever, whoever voted, voted. I may wait till the end of the week tho. Feeling a little ill last days, so i dont feel like making the next step topic.