Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 21 posts
Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC
Allure said: 

People having schizo spam episodes should be timed out too like Med and Delora. Letting them spam a page is too lax imo.

 when has med spammed?

 

Posts: 32798
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC
Allure said: 

People having schizo spam episodes should be timed out too like Med and Delora. Letting them spam a page is too lax imo.

To Med's credit she hasn't filled an entire front page with bumps to hide stuff she doesn't like in a good while. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 6
-1 votes RE: Extend rules for SC

Make it so that you do not need to confirm it is you to take down doxes. Anyone's personal information should not be on a "sociopath community" forum irrespective of whether that person is actually here.

last edit on 3/20/2023 5:30:17 PM
Posts: 6
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC

Second rule:
Temp-ban-for-doxing after few times. Doxing drives away members.

last edit on 3/20/2023 5:37:23 PM
Posts: 32798
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC

That's just asking for users to spam random doxes as spam, like the Alexa Kiska incident. The point is moreover to keep it off the website itself. 

Once the info is known it can be DMed anyway, only so much can be done. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC
Hank said: 

Make it so that you do not need to confirm it is you to take down doxes. Anyone's personal information should not be on a "sociopath community" forum irrespective of whether that person is actually here.

 no. just maybe have another mod who doesn't hate certain women so they can remove doxxes and be somewhat neutral if meta is asleep

Posts: 6
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC
Hank said: 

Make it so that you do not need to confirm it is you to take down doxes. Anyone's personal information should not be on a "sociopath community" forum irrespective of whether that person is actually here.

 no

Why? Explain.

Posts: 1669
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC
Hank said: 

Second rule:
Temp-ban-for-doxing after few times. Doxing drives away members.

 Who's puppet are you? Posted ImagePosted Image

Posts: 451
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC

This is retarded.

Only rule I like is the banning bots one. 

It would be arrogant to think bots aren't powerful enough to ruin the forum and are already nothing but a nuisance.

Posts: 32798
0 votes RE: Extend rules for SC

This is retarded.

Only rule I like is the banning bots one. 

It's a hydra scenario, you ban one and they make two. In this case the only part that's bot scripted is the post content itself, and people adapt. 🤷

Pretty sure I've seen this happen when the Copypasta Chef was replying too quickly early on, making another account to reply with the other one from thinking something automated was going on. It's deleted on sight, which works equally well with less steps. 

More damage tends to be done by making it into a louder topic of discussion, kind of like pedophilia subject, as then it makes a bigger stink than a few promotions that are deleted during the day.

Social wildfire strats mixed with proliferation of the intended subject, I wouldn't be surprised if the same ones doing it are the ones also being like "Zomg guys, look at this stuff!". 😏 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 3/20/2023 10:00:44 PM
10 / 21 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.