Sociopath Community

pachuco2 said: 

Maninist said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Yeah ok, that makes sense.

 You're not wrong about my old man. And I respect that you can reflect on the origins of your philosophy, still gonna have to agree to disagree, but it clarifies where youre coming from.

 Yeah we'll disagree, but let the record show I recognize you're wrong about your Father and Tate. Tate builds men up while your Father cuts them down, they are nothing alike. We'll disagree while you don't identify the subject correctly. 

 Lol i gather agreeing to disagree isn't really your style.

I said we'll disagree. It's written right there.

However. The record shows you likened Tate to your Father, who is short with little man syndrome. He's a person who cuts others down to size. 

That's who you base Tate off of. An insecute little  man  Someone who can never influence others.

Doesn't matter what they achieve, or what the message, people will disagree and that's fine. 

I'm still entitled to review the truth in the exchange. We'll disagree indeed.

Since you recognize that I'm wrong, I wanna further misconstrue the subject and wrongly add that my fundamental problem with Tate is that I think people who define themselves by the inferiority of others are insecure and weak. And any man who needs women to 'obey' and know their place in 'the natural order of things' is threatened by them.

 Of course you'd add that. 

Listen.

A submissive woman is a happy woman.

If your wife isn't submissive to you, beware of the one she's submissive toward. 

That's science for ya.

You can disagree, but that'll only show you what you know.

Hawk said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Maninist said: 

 Yeah we'll disagree, but let the record show I recognize you're wrong about your Father and Tate. Tate builds men up while your Father cuts them down, they are nothing alike. We'll disagree while you don't identify the subject correctly. 

 Lol i gather agreeing to disagree isn't really your style.

I said we'll disagree. It's written right there.

However. The record shows you likened Tate to your Father, who is short with little man syndrome. He's a person who cuts others down to size. 

That's who you base Tate off of. An insecute little  man  Someone who can never influence others.

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Doesn't matter what they achieve, or what the message, people will disagree and that's fine. 

I'm still entitled to review the truth in the exchange. We'll disagree indeed.

Since you recognize that I'm wrong, I wanna further misconstrue the subject and wrongly add that my fundamental problem with Tate is that I think people who define themselves by the inferiority of others are insecure and weak. And any man who needs women to 'obey' and know their place in 'the natural order of things' is threatened by them.

 Of course you'd add that. 

Listen.

A submissive woman is a happy woman.

If your wife isn't submissive to you, beware of the one she's submissive toward. 

That's science for ya.

You can disagree, but that'll only show you what you know.

 She isnt submissive to anyone lol, coz she's an adult person and not a shitzhu at a dog park.

Also, the submissive women are happy argument doesnt really hold up when its not being pitched as a choice. "Be submissive or I'll choke you" is slightly different.

pachuco2 said: 

Hawk said: 

pachuco2 said: 

 Lol i gather agreeing to disagree isn't really your style.

I said we'll disagree. It's written right there.

However. The record shows you likened Tate to your Father, who is short with little man syndrome. He's a person who cuts others down to size. 

That's who you base Tate off of. An insecute little  man  Someone who can never influence others.

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Okay so by your logic, being in control is bad. Probably unless it's a woman. Gotcha.

Doesn't matter what they achieve, or what the message, people will disagree and that's fine. 

I'm still entitled to review the truth in the exchange. We'll disagree indeed.

Since you recognize that I'm wrong, I wanna further misconstrue the subject and wrongly add that my fundamental problem with Tate is that I think people who define themselves by the inferiority of others are insecure and weak. And any man who needs women to 'obey' and know their place in 'the natural order of things' is threatened by them.

 Of course you'd add that. 

Listen.

A submissive woman is a happy woman.

If your wife isn't submissive to you, beware of the one she's submissive toward. 

That's science for ya.

You can disagree, but that'll only show you what you know.

 She isnt submissive to anyone lol, coz she's an adult person and not a shitzhu at a dog park.

Also, the submissive women are happy argument doesnt really hold up when its not being pitched as a choice. "Be submissive or I'll choke you" is slightly different.

 A forced submission isn't submissive.

I said a submissive woman. She will melt like putty for her heart throb. 

You say your wife isn't submissive to anyone. Well you're the guy she married, but it doesn't look like you were her first choice. 

Haven't you see how women act when they fall for a guy ? She'll be very easy for him out of submissiveness.

When she's not submissive, she's either settling or not interested. No offence, but submissive women are happier with their partners.

Canary said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Hawk said: 

I said we'll disagree. It's written right there.

However. The record shows you likened Tate to your Father, who is short with little man syndrome. He's a person who cuts others down to size. 

That's who you base Tate off of. An insecute little  man  Someone who can never influence others.

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Okay so by your logic, being in control is bad. Probably unless it's a woman. Gotcha.

That's a bit of a gross oversimplification of his point. 

He's demonstrating that it both served him and worked against him, and that his inflexible ideas about superiority and constant need for control made him weak and insecure in spite of his successes. 

Canary said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Hawk said: 

I said we'll disagree. It's written right there.

However. The record shows you likened Tate to your Father, who is short with little man syndrome. He's a person who cuts others down to size. 

That's who you base Tate off of. An insecute little  man  Someone who can never influence others.

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Okay so by your logic, being in control is bad. Probably unless it's a woman. Gotcha.

 

Doesn't matter what they achieve, or what the message, people will disagree and that's fine. 

I'm still entitled to review the truth in the exchange. We'll disagree indeed.

 Of course you'd add that. 

Listen.

A submissive woman is a happy woman.

If your wife isn't submissive to you, beware of the one she's submissive toward. 

That's science for ya.

You can disagree, but that'll only show you what you know.

 She isnt submissive to anyone lol, coz she's an adult person and not a shitzhu at a dog park.

Also, the submissive women are happy argument doesnt really hold up when its not being pitched as a choice. "Be submissive or I'll choke you" is slightly different.

 A forced submission isn't submissive.

I said a submissive woman. She will melt like putty for her heart throb. 

You say your wife isn't submissive to anyone. Well you're the guy she married, but it doesn't look like you were her first choice. 

Haven't you see how women act when they fall for a guy ? She'll be very easy for him out of submissiveness.

When she's not submissive, she's either settling or not interested. No offence, but submissive women are happier with their partners.

 Damn I didn't realize you don't know what love is.. Should have led with that lol, could have saved us this entire exchange.

pachuco2 said: 

Canary said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Okay so by your logic, being in control is bad. Probably unless it's a woman. Gotcha.

 

 She isnt submissive to anyone lol, coz she's an adult person and not a shitzhu at a dog park.

Also, the submissive women are happy argument doesnt really hold up when its not being pitched as a choice. "Be submissive or I'll choke you" is slightly different.

 A forced submission isn't submissive.

I said a submissive woman. She will melt like putty for her heart throb. 

You say your wife isn't submissive to anyone. Well you're the guy she married, but it doesn't look like you were her first choice. 

Haven't you see how women act when they fall for a guy ? She'll be very easy for him out of submissiveness.

When she's not submissive, she's either settling or not interested. No offence, but submissive women are happier with their partners.

 Damn I didn't realize you don't know what love is.. Should have led with that lol, could have saved us this entire exchange.

 

 

 i don't think he's ever had a real girlfriend, he has an incel like air about him

pachuco2 said: 

Canary said: 

pachuco2 said: 

Where did i say he was short lol, i was agreeing with the cutting people down thing. I think youre misunderstanding the comparison i was drawing. My dad ran a hedge fund. He had accolytes and more than enough professional power and influence. The thing that made him weak and insecure was rigid, inflexible ideas about superiority, and a constant need for control. Same as Tate.

Okay so by your logic, being in control is bad. Probably unless it's a woman. Gotcha.

 

 She isnt submissive to anyone lol, coz she's an adult person and not a shitzhu at a dog park.

Also, the submissive women are happy argument doesnt really hold up when its not being pitched as a choice. "Be submissive or I'll choke you" is slightly different.

 A forced submission isn't submissive.

I said a submissive woman. She will melt like putty for her heart throb. 

You say your wife isn't submissive to anyone. Well you're the guy she married, but it doesn't look like you were her first choice. 

Haven't you see how women act when they fall for a guy ? She'll be very easy for him out of submissiveness.

When she's not submissive, she's either settling or not interested. No offence, but submissive women are happier with their partners.

 Damn I didn't realize you don't know what love is.. Should have led with that lol, could have saved us this entire exchange.

 

 Fact remains. A submissive woman is happy. You'll argue that isn't love which is fine. Fact remains.

a submissive man will leave the forum when instructed by dominant females, a coven of them specifically.