Say what you will. 3 of us has been singled out, it's clearly a comparison in my opinion.
For you it doesn't matter how successful or useful Chapo is he'll be your #1.
I also feel offended for not being on the list.
I think Med just wanted feedback on Chapo and myself in all honesty. Deep down inside she likes me, even if it's just as a person, it's just she's really hard.
I don't
I never qualified any comparison I just asked the question.
Say what you will. 3 of us has been singled out, it's clearly a comparison in my opinion.
For you it doesn't matter how successful or useful Chapo is he'll be your #1.
I also feel offended for not being on the list.
Orly
med will flirt with most guys here except you tony. same with the disgusting pedophile quintasia walker.
Med don't flirt with any guys.
AppleGenius said:However, I'd say your debate is not getting better. It's rather frustrating to see you debate because you fall into the same patterns, citing things without evidence and then doubling down until the sky is purple, and until you start ignoring inconvenient truths and continue your narrative, similarly to LiYang. It'd be nice for once to see you break the pattern.
Perhaps TC is for want of new interlocutors in order to hone those debating skills. Hard not to fall into a pattern when you're debating the same people and over much the same things.
Perhaps. Would you say the same about LiYang? I see him as someone who doesn't take well to criticism.
At any rate, perhaps we could see if we could get someone new here with a different angle to debate TC. However, so far, almost everyone here that has debated TC reports similar feelings. Even Good refuses to engage with TC over how pointless it is. No offense to TC.
AppleGenius said:However, I'd say your debate is not getting better. It's rather frustrating to see you debate because you fall into the same patterns, citing things without evidence and then doubling down until the sky is purple, and until you start ignoring inconvenient truths and continue your narrative, similarly to LiYang. It'd be nice for once to see you break the pattern.
Perhaps TC is for want of new interlocutors in order to hone those debating skills. Hard not to fall into a pattern when you're debating the same people and over much the same things.
Perhaps. Would you say the same about LiYang? I see him as someone who doesn't take well to criticism.
At any rate, perhaps we could see if we could get someone new here with a different angle to debate TC. However, so far, almost everyone here that has debated TC reports similar feelings. Even Good refuses to engage with TC over how pointless it is. No offense to TC.
Do you talk about me to your friends also?
AppleGenius said:Perhaps. Would you say the same about LiYang? I see him as someone who doesn't take well to criticism.
Either of them are fine with criticism. LiYang is a more narrow case. I enjoyed seeing him and Alice talk. LiYang often takes diversionary tactics, while TC is more prone to exhaust an argument and have people tap out (exasperation counts). However, TC is also at times quite willing to drift off-topic so you have to "hey, what were we arguing about?"
(Sometimes it's just a set up for a chance at refutation.)
LiYang might come into contact with more people via work, but I assume a lot of his antics here aren't things he does at-large. He's always said "fuck you sociopaths" when coming here, so this place is, like for many here, some weird refuge. Perhaps he'll gain better perspective in actual more and varied debates.
Subject matter limits engagement, and differentiates TC and LiYangs debate needs.
Either of them are fine with criticism. LiYang is a more narrow case. I enjoyed seeing him and Alice talk. LiYang often takes diversionary tactics, while TC is more prone to exhaust an argument and have people tap out (exasperation counts). However, TC is also at times quite willing to drift off-topic so you have to "hey, what were we arguing about?"
(Sometimes it's just a set up for a chance at refutation.)
LiYang might come into contact with more people via work, but I assume a lot of his antics here aren't things he does at-large. He's always said "fuck you sociopaths" when coming here, so this place is, like for many here, some weird refuge. Perhaps he'll gain better perspective in actual more and varied debates.
Do you have a topic at hand where you've debated either of them and thought, hmm, that was constructive/went well?
