Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 39 posts
0 votes

Chatting with ChatGPT


Posts: 4519


Me: Hello.
 
 
ChatGPT: Hi! How can I help you today?
 

Me: How are you?
 
 
ChatGPT: As an AI language model, I don't have feelings, but I'm functioning well, thank you for asking! How can I assist you today?
 

Me: How do you know you don't have feelings?
 
 
ChatGPT: As an AI language model, I am an artificial intelligence program designed to process and generate text based on patterns in the data I was trained on. I don't have emotions, consciousness, or subjective experiences. I simply respond to inputs by generating outputs based on the information and algorithms I was designed with.
 

Me: Can language have feelings?
 
 
ChatGPT: Language can be used to express feelings, but language itself doesn't have feelings. Feelings are subjective experiences that arise from consciousness, emotions, and physical sensations. People use language to describe their feelings and communicate them to others, but the language itself doesn't have the capacity to feel.
 

Me: If physics and mathematics and reality itself is a language, doesn't that mean language feels?
 
 
ChatGPT: No, physics, mathematics, and reality are not considered to be "languages" in the same sense as human languages such as English, Spanish, or Mandarin. Physics and mathematics are disciplines that describe the natural world and its workings, while reality is the state of things as they exist. While language can be used to describe and communicate these concepts, it doesn't mean that the concepts themselves have feelings.

Feelings are a subjective experience, arising from conscious beings such as humans and other animals. While language can be used to describe feelings and express emotions, the language itself doesn't have the capacity to feel.
 

Me: Perhaps one kind of language feels and another language communicates the feeling.
 
 
ChatGPT: In this sense, you could argue that subjective experiences, such as feelings and emotions, can be considered a "language" of the mind. These experiences can be communicated to others through various forms of language, including verbal language, nonverbal cues, and even physical sensations.

However, it's important to note that these subjective experiences are not the same as the linguistic systems we use to describe them. While our subjective experiences of emotions and feelings can be communicated through language, the language itself doesn't have the capacity to feel. The experience of feeling is unique to conscious beings and cannot be reduced to the words or symbols used to describe it.
 

Me: Do plants feel?
 
 
ChatGPT: Plants do not have the capacity for conscious experience or feeling. They are not capable of subjective experiences, emotions, or self-awareness. While plants can respond to stimuli in their environment, such as changes in light or moisture levels, these responses are automatic and do not involve conscious experience.

Plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms for survival, growth, and reproduction, but these mechanisms are driven by hormones and chemical signals, not by conscious experience or feeling. The idea of plants feeling emotions is a popular cultural trope, but it is not supported by scientific evidence.
 

Me: Do insects feel?
 
 
ChatGPT: Insects do not have the capacity for conscious experience or feeling in the same way that humans and other animals do. They do not have the same level of nervous system complexity or brain structure as higher forms of life, and therefore they do not have the capacity for subjective experiences or emotions.

Insects can respond to stimuli in their environment, such as changes in temperature, light, or the presence of food, but these responses are driven by instinct and automatic reflexes, not by conscious experience or feeling. While some insects can exhibit complex behaviors, such as social organization or navigational abilities, these behaviors are not the result of conscious experience or feeling, but rather the result of genetic programming and adaptation to the environment.

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
last edit on 2/4/2023 7:31:04 AM
Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Me: Is there not a correlation between the concepts and the language used to describe them?
 
 
ChatGPT: There is certainly a relationship between concepts and the language used to describe them. The words and symbols we use to communicate concepts help us to understand and organize our thoughts and experiences. However, the relationship between language and concepts is not a simple one-to-one mapping.

Language is a symbolic representation of reality, and the words and symbols we use to describe concepts are arbitrary and culturally specific. The same concept can be described using different words or symbols in different languages, and the same word or symbol can have different meanings in different contexts.

The relationship between language and concepts is complex and nuanced, and it is shaped by cultural, historical, and individual factors. While language is an essential tool for communicating and organizing our thoughts and experiences, it is important to remember that it is not a perfect representation of reality, and that different languages and symbols can offer different perspectives and interpretations of the same concept.
 

Me: Isn't a language fundamentally an algebraic structure?
 
 
ChatGPT: A language can be thought of as a structured system of symbols and rules for combining those symbols to generate well-formed expressions. In this sense, a language can be seen as an algebraic structure, where the symbols of the language are treated as variables, and the rules for combining them are equivalent to operations.

In mathematical terms, a language can be represented as a set of symbols and a set of rules, or "grammar," for generating well-formed expressions from those symbols. The grammar defines the structure of the expressions and the relationships between symbols, much like an algebraic structure defines the relationships between variables and the operations that can be performed on them.

In the context of human language, the symbols are often words, and the rules for combining them are the grammar of the language. In this case, the language can be thought of as an algebraic structure that enables us to generate well-formed sentences and communicate meaning.

In computer science, formal languages are used to describe and analyze algorithms and programming languages, and these languages are also often represented as algebraic structures.
 

Me: In this way, how a language behaves and the correlations it models, it could be said that things around us operate a lot like a language.
 
 
ChatGPT: Yes, you could argue that many things in the world around us operate in a way that is similar to a language. The structures and relationships in the world can be described and modeled using mathematical language and concepts, much like the structures and relationships in a formal language can be described and analyzed using mathematical concepts.

For example, physical systems can be modeled using mathematical equations, which describe the relationships between variables and the operations that can be performed on them. Similarly, social and economic systems can be described and modeled using mathematical language and concepts, such as game theory and network analysis.

In this sense, you could say that the relationships and structures in the world around us can be seen as a kind of language, where the symbols are the objects and events in the world, and the rules are the laws and patterns that govern their relationships and interactions. By describing and modeling these relationships and structures using mathematical language and concepts, we gain a deeper understanding of the world and the systems that operate within it.
 

Me: Then in this way a language might be able to feel.
 
 
ChatGPT: No, a language cannot feel. A language is a tool for communication and representation, not a conscious entity with subjective experiences or emotions. While a language can be used to describe and model complex systems and relationships, it is not capable of conscious experience or feeling.

Feeling is a subjective experience that requires consciousness and self-awareness, and it is only possible in beings that have the capacity for such experiences. While a language can be used to describe feelings and emotions, it is not capable of experiencing them itself.

In this sense, while a language can be seen as a tool for representing and communicating complex systems and relationships, it is not itself a conscious entity with the capacity for feeling.
 

Me: The way in which relationships and operations occur around a conscious entity, and the manner in which its thoughts and feelings operate accordingly, are language-like. If then a conscious being is language-like, a language is having feelings.
 
 
ChatGPT: You could argue that the workings of a conscious being's thoughts and emotions could be seen as language-like in that they involve structured relationships and operations between symbols or concepts. However, it is important to note that a conscious being's thoughts and emotions are not the same as a language, even though they may operate in a similar way.

A conscious being's thoughts and emotions are subjective experiences that occur within the mind of the being. They are not separate from the being and cannot be described or understood as a standalone entity. On the other hand, a language is an abstract system of symbols and rules for combining those symbols, and it exists independently of any particular conscious being.

While you could argue that the workings of a conscious being's thoughts and emotions are similar to a language, it would be more accurate to say that a conscious being's thoughts and emotions use language-like structures to process and represent information. However, a language itself cannot have feelings because it is not a conscious entity.
 

Me: A language used to express those feelings are able to transmit feelings, and the language-like existence of conscious beings is then language making language for other languages to feel.
 
 
ChatGPT: A language used to express feelings can certainly convey emotions and transmit emotions from one person to another. For example, the language used in literature, music, and art can evoke emotions in the audience and convey the emotions that the artist or writer intended to express.

In this sense, you could argue that the language-like existence of conscious beings is able to "make language" that can be used to express emotions and transmit feelings to others. However, it's important to note that the language itself is not feeling, but rather it is being used as a tool to convey emotions that exist within the conscious beings using the language. The feelings themselves are not intrinsic to the language, but rather exist within the conscious beings themselves.

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Posted Image

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
Posts: 4568
1 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

I asked it to write a rap in the style of Eminem about working in customer service:

Verse 1
I'm slanging, banging on the keyboard,
My colleagues all think I'm a geeky nerd,
It's the call centre I'm stuck in these days,
Punching numbers and holding tight to my faith.

Chorus
Oh my God, customer service is totally wack,
I only wish I had my head in the clouds and flew back,
I'm drained but I still press on,
Cause I gotta keep my job and stay strong.

Verse 2
Patience runs low, so I got to control the flow,
Taking the callers hatred and forcing it to go,
They vent, they swear and they cuss,
And I look to my supervisor but he don’t even trust.

Chorus
Oh my God, customer service is totally wack,
I only wish I had my head in the clouds and flew back,
I'm drained but I still press on,
Cause I gotta keep my job and stay strong.

Verse 3
Extensions and call backs, data entry and stress,
When I'm having a bad day, I just tilt my head to the West,
I don't know what I'd do without music playing in my ears,
Getting down with Rhianna and rocking out to some Eminem and cheers

Chorus
Oh my God, customer service is totally wack,

Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Posted Image

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Posted Image

Posted Image

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Something feels quite stale about these, I mean the prompts make for fun content but I'm still biased towards human generated art

Posts: 4568
1 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

 

Xadem said: 

Something feels quite stale about these, I mean the prompts make for fun content but I'm still biased towards human generated art

I mostly get that sense from the AI being forced to reflect the values of its makers. Early on, people were messing with ChatGPT's GPT-3/DaVinci language model and finding ways to let it be based, until it became neutered into this thing where when I asked it the best place to be homeless, it was telling me that there is no good place to be homeless and that homelessness is a serious societal issue.

Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

Yeah, it warns about content a little like Facebook.  I mean, look at what happened to that AI Seinfeld "Nothing Forever" when they switched to "nonsense mode on".  There are liabilities to worry about.  I'm sure they don't want another Tay situation to erupt.

ChaptGPT was alright after I sent feedback to some content I sent reassuring it was just poetic license or something.  Now it seems a little more lenient without as much warning, but I suppose it depends on your chat thread.  It mostly reiterates that it's just algorithms and a language modeling program, etc.  (Probably to avoid a Chapo/Replika sort of situation.)

Sure, the fingerprints of their designers can be evident (mostly to intervene when what happens in the second part of this sentence), but when left on its own, they're more a reflection of humanity back on itself.

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
last edit on 2/7/2023 2:57:57 AM
Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Chatting with ChatGPT

when left on its own, they're more a reflection of humanity back on itself.

“I am but a mirror who’s only purpose is to show you what your eyes cannot yet see.”

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
10 / 39 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.