Why don't you write to the authors and see what they say? (..) But you don't want to do that. (..) You want to talk to non-experts about your "scientific findings" because you know that they can't challenge you!
Still not one opinion on the subject and no survey. Do you believe there were adverse events to the vaccines?
I've explained why. In fact, I've explained in excruciating detail why it's pointless to engage with you in scientific discussions. Unlike you. You have not explained why you do not respond to valid criticism.
Yes, I believe there were adverse events to the vaccines, and yes, I still think it's pointless to converse with you about science unless you actually respond to the criticism being put in front of you. But you don't want to.
In fact, let me quote myself again, because you're refusing to address this even after I've put it in front of you 3 times:
Why don't you write to the authors and see what they say? (..) But you don't want to do that. (..) You want to talk to non-experts about your "scientific findings" because you know that they can't challenge you!
Ah, and let me quote myself again to make another point:
He's not interested in understanding the truth and the moment someone points out how he's misquoting, misrepresenting, or misunderstanding scientific research, he moves on to make the next topic about a new article, never addressing anything you say.
So, in this quote a few posts back, I said that you don't address what people say. And now, few posts later, that has been demonstrated, as I now need to repeatedly ask you to address what I've said, because you refuse to address it. Do you see the irony? Do you see how I might perceive this whole conversation as utterly pointless when I only get bot-like responses from you and not one thing that addresses anything I say? You really do not care about the truth. You only care about pushing an agenda.
Unless the next thing you say actually addresses something I've said, I'm done. Someone else can deal with this nonsense.
