Sociopath Community

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

If women want equal rights, which is honestly absurd when you consider how their lives are so much easier and different in general, they should also be treated like men. It’s unrealistic because they are women.

/mfw when this is the opposition vs women's rights. 

Good thing you probably don't vote. 

 Not sure what your point is. I made 2 posts. If women want equal rights they deserve to beaten regularly when in a relationship.

Is that how you see men being treated in relationships, and therefor how to make things equal for women? 

 Yea, absolutely.

 consider the source. a child molesting violent rapist criminal. these are the kind of men that think this way

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

If women want equal rights, which is honestly absurd when you consider how their lives are so much easier and different in general, they should also be treated like men. It’s unrealistic because they are women.

/mfw when this is the opposition vs women's rights. 

Good thing you probably don't vote. 

 Not sure what your point is. I made 2 posts. If women want equal rights they deserve to beaten regularly when in a relationship.

Is that how you see men being treated in relationships, and therefor how to make things equal for women? 

 Yea, absolutely.

You see the current balance of power as women physically beating men? 

Interesting. 

 Pretty sure you’re a dumbshit if you think otherwise.

Did Marilia beat you? 

Was it a slap, or a balled up fist? 

 Probably less than 100 times. I remember lying to people that I walked into a thorn bush for a few days. She threw a pitchfork at me with the absolute intention of hitting me from feet away. The 1st threat she made me was “I’m going to throw a cactus at you”. But the reason I’m saying this is because of my last post on page 49.

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

If women want equal rights, which is honestly absurd when you consider how their lives are so much easier and different in general, they should also be treated like men. It’s unrealistic because they are women.

/mfw when this is the opposition vs women's rights. 

Good thing you probably don't vote. 

 Not sure what your point is. I made 2 posts. If women want equal rights they deserve to beaten regularly when in a relationship.

Is that how you see men being treated in relationships, and therefor how to make things equal for women? 

 Yea, absolutely.

You see the current balance of power as women physically beating men? 

Interesting. 

 Pretty sure you’re a dumbshit if you think otherwise.

Did Marilia beat you? 

Was it a slap, or a balled up fist? 

Probably less than 100 times.

Uhh... even for the shit I'm concerned about in my own life I could probably count the number of instances on my hands. 

That's concerning. 

I remember lying to people that I walked into a thorn bush for a few days. She threw a pitchfork at me with the absolute intention of hitting me from feet away. The 1st threat she made me was “I’m going to throw a cactus at you”. But the reason I’m saying this is because of my last post on page 49.

What led to her threatening to throw a cactus at you, rather than just doing it? 

Usually if they have to say what they're going to do before doing it it's a defensive threat, abusers tend to get off to the act itself if not the narration to scare them. 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

Chapo said: 

If women want equal rights, which is honestly absurd when you consider how their lives are so much easier and different in general, they should also be treated like men. It’s unrealistic because they are women.

/mfw when this is the opposition vs women's rights. 

Good thing you probably don't vote. 

 Not sure what your point is. I made 2 posts. If women want equal rights they deserve to beaten regularly when in a relationship.

Is that how you see men being treated in relationships, and therefor how to make things equal for women? 

 Yea, absolutely.

You see the current balance of power as women physically beating men? 

Interesting. 

 Pretty sure you’re a dumbshit if you think otherwise.

Did Marilia beat you? 

Was it a slap, or a balled up fist? 

Probably less than 100 times.

Uhh... even for the shit I'm concerned about in my own life I could probably count the number of instances on my hands. 

That's concerning. 

I remember lying to people that I walked into a thorn bush for a few days. She threw a pitchfork at me with the absolute intention of hitting me from feet away. The 1st threat she made me was “I’m going to throw a cactus at you”. But the reason I’m saying this is because of my last post on page 49.

What led to her threatening to throw a cactus at you, rather than just doing it? 

Usually if they have to say what they're going to do before doing it it's a defensive threat, abusers tend to get off to the act itself if not the narration to scare them. 

 Well she did have a small cactus in the room but she didn’t grab it.

How severe were these double-digit count's worth of beatings? 

Any black eyes or obvious bruising? Hurt jaw? 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

The problem with feminism is that it attempts to make itself palatable to others by including men. Mainstream feminism is about centering men, and that's just shit because men don't need to be equal in a system that greatly favors them. 

You would prefer that men become second class citizens so they can see what it's like?

Makes sense to me anyway. 

Yes but because it's not possible to do that, they should be taking up their own movement instead of hijacking womens. They are seen as traitors by their own kind for speaking out on how the patriarchy also hurts men but it's not women's job to liberate men from themselves, a supportive group along side would be a great benefit instead of mra.

Side rant:The same men claiming that "women rape too!" Are also the same men refusing to believe a boy was raped by an adult female because 'most boys want sex, he was lucky!' fuck off and die.

Yeah, at least when I say "women rape too" that's not really about numbers so much as capacity. It can happen, and at a psychological basis it's worth exploring and showing concern, but Sociologically it's pretty rare. 

 Women are absolutely capable of raping men and if it not reported or if it's ignored and ridiculed that's still a direct result of men insisting women are weak and incapable. Also not to sound like a heinous bitch but when women rape, there's no fear of being fuckin murdered so there's a very stark difference between rape even then(not saying it's acceptable not saying it doesn't count).

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

The problem with feminism is that it attempts to make itself palatable to others by including men. Mainstream feminism is about centering men, and that's just shit because men don't need to be equal in a system that greatly favors them. 

You would prefer that men become second class citizens so they can see what it's like?

Makes sense to me anyway. 

Yes but because it's not possible to do that, they should be taking up their own movement instead of hijacking womens. They are seen as traitors by their own kind for speaking out on how the patriarchy also hurts men but it's not women's job to liberate men from themselves, a supportive group along side would be a great benefit instead of mra.

Side rant:The same men claiming that "women rape too!" Are also the same men refusing to believe a boy was raped by an adult female because 'most boys want sex, he was lucky!' fuck off and die.

Yeah, at least when I say "women rape too" that's not really about numbers so much as capacity. It can happen, and at a psychological basis it's worth exploring and showing concern, but Sociologically it's pretty rare. 

 Women are absolutely capable of raping men and if it not reported or if it's ignored and ridiculed that's still a direct result of men insisting women are weak and incapable. Also not to sound like a heinous bitch but when women rape, there's no fear of being fuckin murdered so there's a very stark difference between rape even then(not saying it's acceptable not saying it doesn't count).

 Pretty sure I didn’t say it has never happened I said it doesn’t matter nobody cares and there is generally little to no trauma involved (at least for the male).

Turncoat said: 

How severe were these double-digit count's worth of beatings? 

Any black eyes or obvious bruising? Hurt jaw? 

 I’m just implying they should be beaten regularly if they want equal rights, not suggesting they are very capable of being threatening or strong without a firearm.

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

The problem with feminism is that it attempts to make itself palatable to others by including men. Mainstream feminism is about centering men, and that's just shit because men don't need to be equal in a system that greatly favors them. 

You would prefer that men become second class citizens so they can see what it's like?

Makes sense to me anyway. 

Yes but because it's not possible to do that, they should be taking up their own movement instead of hijacking womens.

Nothing gets done when groups subdivide too far, change is done through sheer numbers over how they can get the same messages to a wider audience. 

A lot of what has people struggling to work together in an increasingly chaotic environment is over how we're splitting into too many subcultures. By the end of it everyone has different Lexicons and can even be mistakenly made to fight one another instead of tackling larger issues. 

When groups subdivide too far, they just have to wait around three weeks to two months to watch the whole thing blow over in favor of the next drama. 

They are seen as traitors by their own kind for speaking out on how the patriarchy also hurts men but it's not women's job to liberate men from themselves, a supportive group along side would be a great benefit instead of mra.

Women still have enough power to help men help women. 

The problem is moreover the people who appropriate these movements for other ideas, there otherwise is benefit in numbers unless you're planning on being an Extremist who bombs shit or whatever. 

The goal of a peaceful protest is to convince the enemy to put down their arms without having thrown a punch, but if you think peaceful protest won't solve anything then you are essentially pro-extremist behaviors over seeing that as the only way to get anything done. 

Side rant:The same men claiming that "women rape too!" Are also the same men refusing to believe a boy was raped by an adult female because 'most boys want sex, he was lucky!' fuck off and die.

Yeah, at least when I say "women rape too" that's not really about numbers so much as capacity. It can happen, and at a psychological basis it's worth exploring and showing concern, but Sociologically it's pretty rare. 

Women are absolutely capable of raping men and if it not reported or if it's ignored and ridiculed that's still a direct result of men insisting women are weak and incapable.

In most cases I found myself having to explain how a woman could even accomplish rape. 

Also not to sound like a heinous bitch but when women rape, there's no fear of being fuckin murdered

There was for mine, she made threats with a knife to more than just me. 

Chapo said: 

Turncoat said: 

How severe were these double-digit count's worth of beatings? 

Any black eyes or obvious bruising? Hurt jaw? 

 I’m just implying they should be beaten regularly if they want equal rights, not suggesting they are very capable of being threatening or strong without a firearm.

Then how is this equal? 

If you beat a man, they can sue you or divorce you too.