Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 33414
1 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

  How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

last edit on 1/16/2023 2:32:14 PM
Posts: 33414
1 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simple puzzle. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/16/2023 2:39:05 PM
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simply puzzle. 

 Pretty sure the scoring is deflated if anything. Also you’re a dumbass.

Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simply puzzle. 

 Pretty sure the scoring is deflated if anything. Also you’re a dumbass.

If that score was legitimate you'd be able to join Mensa. 

I don't think you understand how IQ works. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simply puzzle. 

 Pretty sure the scoring is deflated if anything. Also you’re a dumbass.

If that score was legitimate you'd be able to join Mensa. 

I don't think you understand how IQ works. 

 I would imagine I can. Will let you know.

Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simply puzzle. 

 Pretty sure the scoring is deflated if anything. Also you’re a dumbass.

If that score was legitimate you'd be able to join Mensa. 

I don't think you understand how IQ works. 

 I would imagine I can. Will let you know.

130+ IQ is in the upper 2.2% of people, and again, qualified to join Mensa. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 
Chapo said: 

We should make this objective.

 I agree. Something better than some random paid app.

 K you make a dumbass suggestion then.

 I feel like Legga's suggestion was adequate. Anything beyond this point is playing chess with a pigeon.

 You’re a dumbass for feeling that way. I would win any legitimate unbiased suggestion for sure and it is easy to assume you took the test after agreeing you would and either didn’t pay knowing you wouldn’t surpass my score or paid got your score and didn’t like it enough to post it. Calling myself the winner until you can do something to say otherwise.

Coward. 

How??? I suggested a fair way to determine a winner, she refused to display results after certainly implying she would. I also don’t think Leggas system will create a certain unbiased winner, but if it does, it would be me. She hasn’t suggested any other method to determine a winner so it seems I am the winner. Also you’re a dumbass.

In her shoes I wouldn't throw money at a bullshit IQ test either, that test's scoring is obviously inflated to justify having tricked them out of their money, there's tons of fake tests like this online who tell scammed people that they're smart. 

Legga presented a way to gauge it: A cipher to decode. This method is free, the one presenting it is not on either person's side, and it does take a good deal of intelligence to work through that kind of thing. If you really think you're smarter than her, then this ought to just be like a simply puzzle. 

 Pretty sure the scoring is deflated if anything. Also you’re a dumbass.

If that score was legitimate you'd be able to join Mensa. 

I don't think you understand how IQ works. 

 I would imagine I can. Will let you know.

130+ IQ is in the upper 2.2% of people, and again, qualified to join Mensa. 

 I am aware.

Posts: 33414
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence

Mensa would fucking laugh you out of the testing facility after talking circles around you, come on now. 

This level of confidence is classic Dunning Krugger: 

Dunning-Kruger Effect: How Low-Skilled People Overestimate Their Own Abilities

The Dunning-Kruger effect, also referred to as “Mount Stupid”, is a common and widely-known cognitive bias. It is named after the two researchers David Dunning and Justin Kruger who identified it in 1999.

In short: It describes the tendency of low performers to see themselves as more knowledgeable and capable than they really are. This happens because low-competence individuals tend to be unable to determine the true level of their own abilities, as well as recognize the skills of others.


What Is the Dunning-Kruger Effect?

The Dunning-Kruger effect is a bias whereby people with low ability in a certain area tend to overestimate their capability in that area.

Most of us can likely think of a situation where someone’s behavior was (likely) influenced by it. For example, it’s not uncommon to hear people make overconfident claims and give lengthy speeches about something that they, in reality, know much less about than they let others understand. Thus, people falling prey to this effect are also described to be on “Mount Stupid”.


Causes
 
The main reason behind it is that low-skilled people lack the needed self-awareness to properly assess their performance. As Dunning and Kruger explained¹:

Overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it.

In other words, being unable to judge the level of own performance, and thus the performances of other people, leads to an inaccurate sense of one’s capabilities.


Origin
 
The concept is named after David Dunning and Justin Kruger of Cornell University, who identified the phenomenon as a cognitive bias in their 1999 paper.

In their studies, they tested the subjects in three areas: grammar, logic, and sense of humor. The results showed that those individuals who got the lowest scores in the tests consistently rated their own performances higher than what the scores revealed. More precisely, people whose scores placed them in the 12th percentile ranked themselves, on average, in the 62nd percentile.


Impostor Syndrome

A psychological phenomenon known as “impostor syndrome” is the opposite of the Dunning-Kruger effect. It refers to the belief that one is not as competent as their achievements show and/or other people perceive them to be.

It involves the idea that one has succeeded previously due to chance and luck, not because they are skilled or talented, and that someone will eventually find out — hence the name “impostor syndrome”.

Source: https://fallacyinlogic.com/dunning-kruger-effect/

 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: POLL : SC intelligence
We will see
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.