If you have people that are willing to take the blame, willing to be framed so you can continue your killing spree, is this realistic? Obviously this would have to be more or less a very low number of people killed at a time. Wondering how law enforcement would actually legitimately react.
There is already a psychological malady known as False Confessions, where people for whatever reason psych themselves into thinking they committed a crime that they did not. While some will live with this false sense of guilt, others can't take the pressure and can be found turning themselves in to the police or otherwise admitting to odd things. There is also those who simply "confess" to whatever they think they want to hear from being put under pressure.
As a result of this, Copycat behavior, and fans or cohorts willing to take the blame, cops are already looking for how confessions could be incorrect. It doesn't suddenly make the evidence trail go cold unless the ones in power that day don't feel like looking any further into it.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
1/13/2023 2:13:50 AM
Wouldn't the fbi/law enforcement know that something's up if the murders are consistent and continuing even if they have their confessed or framed suspect?
Every murder would have to be unique enough. Also possible it would be in the murderers best interest to move around the country a lot.
last edit on
1/13/2023 7:10:32 AM
Wouldn't the fbi/law enforcement know that something's up if the murders are consistent and continuing even if they have their confessed or framed suspect?
Every murder would have to be unique enough. Also possible it would be in the murderers best interest to move around the country a lot.
I think with today's technology it would be almost impossible to be a spree killer for very long.
Wouldn't the fbi/law enforcement know that something's up if the murders are consistent and continuing even if they have their confessed or framed suspect?
Every murder would have to be unique enough. Also possible it would be in the murderers best interest to move around the country a lot.
I think with today's technology it would be almost impossible to be a spree killer for very long.
In a city maybe:
People could probably still kind of get away with it in the country though.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Wouldn't the fbi/law enforcement know that something's up if the murders are consistent and continuing even if they have their confessed or framed suspect?
Every murder would have to be unique enough. Also possible it would be in the murderers best interest to move around the country a lot.
I think with today's technology it would be almost impossible to be a spree killer for very long.
In a city maybe:
People could probably still kind of get away with it in the country though.
Spree killers are different from serial killers, spree killers are more likely to get caught because of how they escalate so quickly. They're trying to get as many people as possible before being caught.
I feel like you could just have people get guns legally, not get any finger prints on them, dispose of them obviously and just have the gun connected to the framed individual. Pretty sure if they confessed not much else would happen. The only hard part would be getting away from the crime scene.
last edit on
1/13/2023 8:47:15 PM
I feel like you could just have people get guns legally, not get any finger prints on them, dispose of them obviously and just have the gun connected to the framed individual. Pretty sure if they confessed not much else would happen. The only hard part would be getting away from the crime scene.
Framed individual having a solid alibi would screw you over and at most they'd be charged with some sort of negligence for their firearm since that shit is supposed to be in a locked location/cabinet. Confession would still be vetted for spree and serial killers. If it was a single homicide with clear evidence maybe that's all it would take, but i don't think that would apply to multiple murders.
You could drop DNA in any way, get recorded through a camera leaving the scene and it would simply be better to not kill anyone Chapo. I think five guys might actually fire you for that.