Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 25 posts
0 votes

Quotes not by forum members


Posts: 2266

I would like to attempt here to describe, in terms of philosophical concepts, the development of foundational research in mathematics since around the turn of the century, and to fit it into a general schema of possible philosophical world-views. For this, it is necessary first of all to become clear about the schema itself. I believe that the most fruitful principle for gaining an overall view of the possible world-views will be to divide them up according to the degree and the manner of their affinity to or, respectively, turning away from metaphysics (or religion). In this way we immediately obtain a division into two groups: skepticism, materialism and positivism stand on one side, spiritualism, idealism and theology on the other.
[...]
Now it is a familiar fact, even a platitude, that the development of philosophy since the Renaissance has by and large gone from right to left - not in a straight line, but with reverses, yet still, on the whole. Particularly in physics, this development has reached a peak in our own time. [...] It would truly be a miracle if this (I would like to say rabid) development had not also begun to make itself felt in the conception of mathematics. Actually, mathematics, by its nature as an a priori science, always has, in and of itself, an inclination toward the right, and, for this reason, has long withstood the spirit of the time that has ruled since the Renaissance.

The modern development of the foundations of mathematics in the light of philosophy, Kurt Godel 

Posts: 35
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members

you dont get rich writing science ficition. if you wanna get rich, you start a religion

Posts: 2474
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members

Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school. — Albert Einstein

Posts: 2479
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members

All right Alice, I’m not sure you used platitude correctly. It means a trite, oft-repeated saying or cliche. See here for examples: 

https://www.thoughtco.com/platitude-definition-1691514

Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members
Med said: 

All right Alice, I’m not sure you used platitude correctly. It means a trite, oft-repeated saying or cliche. See here for examples: 

https://www.thoughtco.com/platitude-definition-1691514

You mean Gödel, arguably the greatest Logician of the 20th century who understood Formal Language and Grammar better than any other in human history, didn't use the word 'platitude' correctly. 

Beyond that appeal to authority his use of the word is exactly in line with how you've defined it. 

Posts: 2479
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members

Now that you’ve freed me of the possibility of insulting you: don’t you find his writing to be a little stiff or stilted? 

Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members
Med said: 

Now that you’ve freed me of the possibility of insulting you: don’t you find his writing to be a little stiff or stilted? 

Yes, if by stiff or stilted you mean formal. 

I find the writing style belonging to a philosopher of formal language understandably formal. 

Posts: 2479
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members

Na Alice I mean his sentences are choppy. He interrupts every thought with a parenthetical phrase, which you might say is stylistically in line with his compatriots of the 19th century but makes it that much harder to follow.

last edit on 11/26/2022 9:53:04 PM
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members
Med said: 

Na girl I mean his sentences are choppy. He interrupts every thought with a parenthetical phrase, which you might say is stylistically in line with his compatriots of the 19th century but makes it that much harder to follow.

He lived in the 20th century. 

I don't find his writing style hard to follow at all. 

Posts: 4519
0 votes RE: Quotes not by forum members
Med said: 

Na girl I mean his sentences are choppy. He interrupts every thought with a parenthetical phrase, which you might say is stylistically in line with his compatriots of the 19th century but makes it that much harder to follow.

He lived in the 20th century. 

I don't find his writing style hard to follow at all. 

 It can seem a poetry of sorts.

Thrall to the Wire of Self-Excited Circuit.
10 / 25 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.