Sociopath Community

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

The checkmark is obtainable when proof is supplied, that won't change.

It costs $8 a month, for nothing. 

it boosts you on the algorithm in replies and shit. you can argue that the checkmark system before was good, but i would be against you on that. $8 a month for more engagement isn't a big deal, and it's being adjusted by the value of currency in your country

Like Critical was going on about, it's a system that tells people the $8 spender is more legitimate. In his case he has no plan over buying the checkmark, so he suspects scammers will be able to use his name as if they were him over their willingness to pay money he otherwise is not. 

It doesn't even get rid of ads, it halves them. 

LiYang said: 

Elon, the master troll, love it. Blue check marks exploding! BOOOOOOMMMMMMM

 It's clear that the DoJ was working with Twitter for "security reasons" one of the things they censored was, as they call it "false claims as to the origin of COVID-19" 

Like really. They care so much about people discussing that, plus everyone knows the Wuhan bat thing is fake news.

Thought policing.

Watch the mainstream media, Hollywood and celebrities gradually have their meltdowns while right wingers big and small rejoice as Twitter makes the push to being a transparent open source platform. It's the same people.

I swear, right wing fandom always condenses their message to buzz words and single sentences. 

Everytime I see this young woman, she makes me laugh.

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

The checkmark is obtainable when proof is supplied, that won't change.

It costs $8 a month, for nothing. 

it boosts you on the algorithm in replies and shit. you can argue that the checkmark system before was good, but i would be against you on that. $8 a month for more engagement isn't a big deal, and it's being adjusted by the value of currency in your country

Like Critical was going on about, it's a system that tells people the $8 spender is more legitimate. In his case he has no plan over buying the checkmark, so he suspects scammers will be able to use his name as if they were him over their willingness to pay money he otherwise is not. 

It doesn't even get rid of ads, it halves them. 

because it was such a meritocracy before, right?

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

The checkmark is obtainable when proof is supplied, that won't change.

It costs $8 a month, for nothing. 

it boosts you on the algorithm in replies and shit. you can argue that the checkmark system before was good, but i would be against you on that. $8 a month for more engagement isn't a big deal, and it's being adjusted by the value of currency in your country

Like Critical was going on about, it's a system that tells people the $8 spender is more legitimate. In his case he has no plan over buying the checkmark, so he suspects scammers will be able to use his name as if they were him over their willingness to pay money he otherwise is not. 

It doesn't even get rid of ads, it halves them. 

because it was such a meritocracy before, right?

Scams are scams, not sure what it being sensational or not has to do with anything. 

Hodge Twins are reporting their follows are going up.

Some are saying it's because the bots are accumulating. Others are saying they never saw them before in their feed and are following them.

I think it's  because the Hodge Twins replied to Elon's Tweet about how impersonating other twitter accounts will result in a ban, and how the twins posted an image showing Kathy Griffin is permanently banned for impersonating Elon with her main account.

I don't tweet much, but this isn't boring.

It's not just fun in the sense the left is having a meltdown, but also the truth prevailing.

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

The checkmark is obtainable when proof is supplied, that won't change.

It costs $8 a month, for nothing. 

it boosts you on the algorithm in replies and shit. you can argue that the checkmark system before was good, but i would be against you on that. $8 a month for more engagement isn't a big deal, and it's being adjusted by the value of currency in your country

Like Critical was going on about, it's a system that tells people the $8 spender is more legitimate. In his case he has no plan over buying the checkmark, so he suspects scammers will be able to use his name as if they were him over their willingness to pay money he otherwise is not. 

It doesn't even get rid of ads, it halves them. 

because it was such a meritocracy before, right?

Scams are scams, not sure what it being sensational or not has to do with anything. 

because it's not a scam, it's a business and businesses need to make money. the dude just spent a ton of money buying the shit. you just don't like the new terms of what makes people "relevant"