Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 21 posts
Posts: 2857
0 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 

Since you are just being a brat and its not identifying information, I don't care.

if u want to discuss the rules, dont discuss them with me

i dont make the rules, u make the rules, if i made the rules, self doxing would be banned too and people who dox would be banned, not just have their post removed. including self doxing, maybe after a warning for that one. So idk why you involve me, what do you want from me ?? i am going to sleep now.

 all we want is the same treatment from your bastard mod. why would he go out of his way to delete every mention of quin the child molester but he won't do the same for lena and i's requests? it's not a good idea to have a mod playing favorites, particularly with a confirmed pedophile

so, what do u want me to do

i am not administrative power, i am executive power. i only execute orders.

the community is the administrative power. as part of the community, i personally do not care. his actions are not of consequence so far, just creating drama. The only issue i have is that people are forcing me to care and that annoys me. Last time i was annoyed someone took down the forum over their personal drama and i banned them both, but TC unbanned them, so i dont care about this forum even more. It can go to hell, or it can prosper, not my call.

if the majority of the community decides on an action, i will execute it. But don't try to force me in the decision-making.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 3965
1 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 
Good said: 

Since you are just being a brat and its not identifying information, I don't care.

if u want to discuss the rules, dont discuss them with me

i dont make the rules, u make the rules, if i made the rules, self doxing would be banned too and people who dox would be banned, not just have their post removed. including self doxing, maybe after a warning for that one. So idk why you involve me, what do you want from me ?? i am going to sleep now.

 all we want is the same treatment from your bastard mod. why would he go out of his way to delete every mention of quin the child molester but he won't do the same for lena and i's requests? it's not a good idea to have a mod playing favorites, particularly with a confirmed pedophile

so, what do u want me to do

i am not administrative power, i am executive power. i only execute orders.

the community is the administrative power. as part of the community, i personally do not care. his actions are not of consequence so far, just creating drama. The only issue i have is that people are forcing me to care and that annoys me. Last time i was annoyed someone took down the forum over their personal drama and i banned them both, but TC unbanned them, so i dont care about this forum even more. It can go to hell, or it can prosper, not my call.

if the majority of the community decides on an action, i will execute it. But don't try to force me in the decision-making.

 i want you to put him on a warning, that u will take away his precious e power is he continues to abuse mod and go above and beyond to protect a pedophile. this is why lunas forum failed, and i know you don't care, you probably care less than i do lmao

but yea i want u to give him a stern warning. maybe slam ur hand down on the keyboard, grab ur computer by the throat, really shake him up. think about having other mods, he tries to scare away any other mods by doxxing (tony) or going on smear campaigns against them (inquirer) so he will be the only one u rely on. he also intentionally left up cp when inq was mod as a show of childlike defiance, so he's just the worst most spiteful mod u could ever have.

maybe we can vote on potential new mods, put names forward etc. tony is still a mod right?

Posts: 138
0 votes RE: Removal of information

Maybe we both left at the same time, you are liberty taking fucksa. bany of you in the uk contact me

 

Posts: 2857
1 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 
Good said: 

Since you are just being a brat and its not identifying information, I don't care.

if u want to discuss the rules, dont discuss them with me

i dont make the rules, u make the rules, if i made the rules, self doxing would be banned too and people who dox would be banned, not just have their post removed. including self doxing, maybe after a warning for that one. So idk why you involve me, what do you want from me ?? i am going to sleep now.

 all we want is the same treatment from your bastard mod. why would he go out of his way to delete every mention of quin the child molester but he won't do the same for lena and i's requests? it's not a good idea to have a mod playing favorites, particularly with a confirmed pedophile

so, what do u want me to do

i am not administrative power, i am executive power. i only execute orders.

the community is the administrative power. as part of the community, i personally do not care. his actions are not of consequence so far, just creating drama. The only issue i have is that people are forcing me to care and that annoys me. Last time i was annoyed someone took down the forum over their personal drama and i banned them both, but TC unbanned them, so i dont care about this forum even more. It can go to hell, or it can prosper, not my call.

if the majority of the community decides on an action, i will execute it. But don't try to force me in the decision-making.

 i want you to put him on a warning, that u will take away his precious e power is he continues to abuse mod and go above and beyond to protect a pedophile. this is why lunas forum failed, and i know you don't care, you probably care less than i do lmao

but yea i want u to give him a stern warning. maybe slam ur hand down on the keyboard, grab ur computer by the throat, really shake him up. think about having other mods, he tries to scare away any other mods by doxxing (tony) or going on smear campaigns against them (inquirer) so he will be the only one u rely on. he also intentionally left up cp when inq was mod as a show of childlike defiance, so he's just the worst most spiteful mod u could ever have.

maybe we can vote on potential new mods, put names forward etc. tony is still a mod right?

If everyone believes that he abuses his power and wants him demodded, then i guess he will be demodded.

When was this CP left? When Cawk was spamming it I asked the mods to leave it up for a little while intentionally, so cawk doesnt get too high and mighty about CP being deleted instantly.

TC has been doing good IMO, he can be spiteful all he wants, as long as he does what a mod should do.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 1669
0 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 
Good said: 
Good said: 

Since you are just being a brat and its not identifying information, I don't care.

if u want to discuss the rules, dont discuss them with me

i dont make the rules, u make the rules, if i made the rules, self doxing would be banned too and people who dox would be banned, not just have their post removed. including self doxing, maybe after a warning for that one. So idk why you involve me, what do you want from me ?? i am going to sleep now.

 all we want is the same treatment from your bastard mod. why would he go out of his way to delete every mention of quin the child molester but he won't do the same for lena and i's requests? it's not a good idea to have a mod playing favorites, particularly with a confirmed pedophile

so, what do u want me to do

i am not administrative power, i am executive power. i only execute orders.

the community is the administrative power. as part of the community, i personally do not care. his actions are not of consequence so far, just creating drama. The only issue i have is that people are forcing me to care and that annoys me. Last time i was annoyed someone took down the forum over their personal drama and i banned them both, but TC unbanned them, so i dont care about this forum even more. It can go to hell, or it can prosper, not my call.

if the majority of the community decides on an action, i will execute it. But don't try to force me in the decision-making.

 i want you to put him on a warning, that u will take away his precious e power is he continues to abuse mod and go above and beyond to protect a pedophile. this is why lunas forum failed, and i know you don't care, you probably care less than i do lmao

but yea i want u to give him a stern warning. maybe slam ur hand down on the keyboard, grab ur computer by the throat, really shake him up. think about having other mods, he tries to scare away any other mods by doxxing (tony) or going on smear campaigns against them (inquirer) so he will be the only one u rely on. he also intentionally left up cp when inq was mod as a show of childlike defiance, so he's just the worst most spiteful mod u could ever have.

maybe we can vote on potential new mods, put names forward etc. tony is still a mod right?

If everyone believes that he abuses his power and wants him demodded, then i guess he will be demodded.

When was this CP left? When Cawk was spamming it I asked the mods to leave it up for a little while intentionally, so cawk doesnt get too high and mighty about CP being deleted instantly.

TC has been doing good IMO, he can be spiteful all he wants, as long as he does what a mod should do.

 His spite makes him biased, hes been removing words like "attorney" and "sister". It's about time.

Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: Removal of information

 /takes down the words 'sister' and 'attorney'

Posted Image

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 
Good said: 
Good said: 

Since you are just being a brat and its not identifying information, I don't care.

if u want to discuss the rules, dont discuss them with me

i dont make the rules, u make the rules, if i made the rules, self doxing would be banned too and people who dox would be banned, not just have their post removed. including self doxing, maybe after a warning for that one. So idk why you involve me, what do you want from me ?? i am going to sleep now.

 all we want is the same treatment from your bastard mod. why would he go out of his way to delete every mention of quin the child molester but he won't do the same for lena and i's requests? it's not a good idea to have a mod playing favorites, particularly with a confirmed pedophile

so, what do u want me to do

i am not administrative power, i am executive power. i only execute orders.

the community is the administrative power. as part of the community, i personally do not care. his actions are not of consequence so far, just creating drama. The only issue i have is that people are forcing me to care and that annoys me. Last time i was annoyed someone took down the forum over their personal drama and i banned them both, but TC unbanned them, so i dont care about this forum even more. It can go to hell, or it can prosper, not my call.

if the majority of the community decides on an action, i will execute it. But don't try to force me in the decision-making.

 i want you to put him on a warning, that u will take away his precious e power is he continues to abuse mod and go above and beyond to protect a pedophile. this is why lunas forum failed, and i know you don't care, you probably care less than i do lmao

but yea i want u to give him a stern warning. maybe slam ur hand down on the keyboard, grab ur computer by the throat, really shake him up. think about having other mods, he tries to scare away any other mods by doxxing (tony) or going on smear campaigns against them (inquirer) so he will be the only one u rely on. he also intentionally left up cp when inq was mod as a show of childlike defiance, so he's just the worst most spiteful mod u could ever have.

maybe we can vote on potential new mods, put names forward etc. tony is still a mod right?

If everyone believes that he abuses his power and wants him demodded, then i guess he will be demodded.

When was this CP left?

I have no idea, even years back I was taking down that shit on sight. 

Probably the whole "He didn't take it down within 15 minutes so he must want it here" thing, if not the "He was pretending to be JIM" rhetoric that those who were once there know better over. 

When Cawk was spamming it I asked the mods to leave it up for a little while intentionally, so cawk doesnt get too high and mighty about CP being deleted instantly.

TC has been doing good IMO, he can be spiteful all he wants, as long as he does what a mod should do.

Sugar is simply trying to pigeonhole all of her opposition into a pedo framework so that she can virtue signal. Tryp called it recently and I can't really say he's wrong. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2857
1 votes RE: Removal of information

I can believe sugar and alena that you prefer some users over others, but if i were to be convinced personally i would want proof, since i dont pay attention all the time. And the deleting of job titles is weird. As for deleting stuff before people even ask, I personally like it, but I woulndt do it, because I couldn't be bothered unless sm1 complains. But I can acknowledge that it was not part of the rules originally as I remember them. I remember that people had to ask first for each dox to be removed, and I can see some leniency if they ask for a dox and its reposted within a minute/hour/day again to be removed without asking, its kind of common sense.

Cheery bye!
last edit on 7/3/2022 2:55:08 PM
Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: Removal of information
Good said: 

I can believe sugar and alena that you prefer some users over others, but if i were to be convinced personally i would want proof, since i dont pay attention all the time. And the deleting of job titles is weird.

As a mod I have to be unbiased, but as a user I can do as I please. I've made a strict point of keeping the two separated, and at this point they are only complaining over how the same protocols that would be used on a normal user are being granted equally to a supposed pedophile. 

When all they have is 'zomg pedo sympathizer' and 'he removed two words', is this really a case? 

As for deleting stuff before people even ask, I personally like it, but I woulndt do it, because I couldn't be bothered unless sm1 complains.

It's only been taken down when they ask, but some have asked to have it taken down on sight, which is something that's been the case for a while now. 

To expect someone to have to ask for every single occurrence one-by-one would get a bit insane. 
 

I remember that people had to ask first for each dox to be removed

There were definitely down on sight requests during Luna's too, I had to act on it then as well. If it were 'down on request' for each individual one then they'd have to ask every single time it's reposted like one minute later

What was stricter back then was moreover how anything self-revealed was allowed to stay up, which has otherwise changed here over the Med situation. Linking to exterior websites that have dox info in them was also questioned at one point in the past, but to allow that over CS would open the grounds to allow that for everyone else, like Spatial's rant about perpetual energy on the website Ed uploaded it to for example. 

There was also the chaos factor over how Luna could change the rules on a whim, like allowing doxes for 24 hours when she's mad at someone. The current structure has less chaos so some here are hungry for an opening. 

, and I can see some leniency if they ask for a dox and its reposted within a minute/hour/day again to be removed without asking, its kind of common sense.

Those campaigns were not only one day long, and why should they have to ask repeatedly over every single instance? 

Again that's like holding the user hostage. What if they wanted to take a break from the place only to return to seeing pages of dox info plastered all over the place? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 7/3/2022 3:11:49 PM
Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Removal of information

going so far as to change the name of a user 'quinton' too. who goes out of their way to protect a pedophile/child molester, to the point their only purpose in this world (being a mod on a forum) is at risk? yea it makes u look like a pedo sympathizer at best. even good is confused as to wtf ur doing taking down job titles or random words like 'customer service' and 'sister'.

also i dunno why u keep bringing up trip, trip watched child porn and had sex with quin in the bed with jade. i could accuse him of being a lot worse than a pedo sympathizer. also being genuine friends with jim, someone who actually rapes children..what do u think this says about ur character tc? it's like u genuinely dont see how fucked up it is cos u grew up around it on account of ur overweight mother being a child rapist or smth

it also shows tc's stability as a mod is based on whether crow is taking dicks without letting tc watch and jerk off in the corner

10 / 21 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.