Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 53 posts
Posts: 32797
-1 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info
Good said: 
Good said: 

uh, stop it tc

Why though? 

its not part of the dox

but more importantly, people come to me when you do something and that is not good

Her work website has been repeatedly posted here, as far as I am concerned it's an identifying detail just as much as where she lives. 

This is otherwise just a few people hungry to get doxes off, but if we followed their whims then we'd be able to post all kinds of doxes here once they were considered 'gone'. That's practically holding the userbase hostage to force them to check in to not have doxes stay up. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/30/2022 9:55:53 PM
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info
Good said: 
Good said: 

uh, stop it tc

Why though? 

its not part of the dox

but more importantly, people come to me when you do something and that is not good

Her work website has been repeatedly posted here, as far as I am concerned it's an identifying detail just as much as where she lives. 

This is otherwise just a few people hungry to get doxes off, but if we followed their whims then we'd be able to post all kinds of doxes here once they were considered 'gone'. That's practically holding the userbase hostage to force them to check in to not have doxes stay up. 

 But why are you taking down her dox when she's repeatedly posted her name here?

Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info
Lenalee said: 
Good said: 
Good said: 

uh, stop it tc

Why though? 

its not part of the dox

but more importantly, people come to me when you do something and that is not good

Her work website has been repeatedly posted here, as far as I am concerned it's an identifying detail just as much as where she lives. 

This is otherwise just a few people hungry to get doxes off, but if we followed their whims then we'd be able to post all kinds of doxes here once they were considered 'gone'. That's practically holding the userbase hostage to force them to check in to not have doxes stay up. 

 But why are you taking down her dox when she's repeatedly posted her name here?

Because that is no longer criteria for people of this tier, they need help even from themselves. 

It's down on request, them's the brakes. This isn't the SC it once was. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info
Lenalee said: 
Good said: 
Good said: 

uh, stop it tc

Why though? 

its not part of the dox

but more importantly, people come to me when you do something and that is not good

Her work website has been repeatedly posted here, as far as I am concerned it's an identifying detail just as much as where she lives. 

This is otherwise just a few people hungry to get doxes off, but if we followed their whims then we'd be able to post all kinds of doxes here once they were considered 'gone'. That's practically holding the userbase hostage to force them to check in to not have doxes stay up. 

 But why are you taking down her dox when she's repeatedly posted her name here?

Because that is no longer criteria for people of this tier, they need help even from themselves. 

It's down on request, them's the brakes. This isn't the SC it once was. 

 I don't give a fuck, this was information she herself has posted on here to prove to others that she had email contact with Jim. You deleting her name and email fucks up the thread and point of it. 

You are fucking up and overeaching

Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info

It's down on request, and you keep bumping stuff to the front page that I then have to address. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info

It's down on request, and you keep bumping stuff to the front page that I then have to address. 

 It's down on request when other people post her information/name/face it should not be down on request when she posts it.

Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info
Lenalee said: 

It's down on request, and you keep bumping stuff to the front page that I then have to address. 

 It's down on request when other people post her information/name/face it should not be down on request when she posts it.

No, it's about it being on this website at all nowadays. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info

Both you and good have been going through threads this months and deleting posts/pictures, some have not been bumped and yet deletion is occurring 

You fucks 

Posts: 32797
0 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info

Down on request was turned into this travesty a while ago, over a different person. There was fighting over it and everything, and by the end of it "Down on Request even over their own content" was accepted. 

Then years later people go "WTF?" over it. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2857
1 votes RE: good, please reel in tc with the removing of info

no, you take it down on request, doesnt matter if they posted it themselves.


i dont know what u removed TC, but the fact she has a sister or what her job is, is not identifying, if u removed her website or something, then its fine

Cheery bye!
last edit on 6/30/2022 11:14:44 PM
10 / 53 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.