Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 posts
0 votes

y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde


Posts: 5714

I loved fantasies-  versions of both that neither could ever, ever live up to  because no mere man (or woman) has ever, ever lived up to my fantasies  which is why I have many failed relationships in my past because I was never anywhere close to satisfied with seeing another human being as an "equal",  when I am literally the goddess in a human body the significant other of God

 

like yeah on the outside I look as ugly  (even more because I am obese)  as Jesus did in human form,  but like we both know that looks mean nothing and that we aren't even supposed to be lusted after because that is innapropriate

 

so like yeah,  long story short the fantasy version of Michael majlak that was in my head has come crashing down lately,  and now I do not really have anyone else to fantasize about because fantasizing about Jesus and him not having spiritual s**ual intercourse with me like Satan was is too humiliating,  and I have been considering that maybe I am supposed to be a sexual and that maybe both Jesus and I are asexual  (as In I am "supposed" to be asexual)

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 8:22:52 PM
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

so let us have a moment of silence for the fact like the real Michael Majlak world never have been able to satisfy me because no other man has been able to,  so why would he be able to

 

the end  :/

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 8:23:10 PM
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

absolute sh**ty day,  but I will be fine I always am  and I am already recovering and coming back to reality  :)

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 8:23:35 PM
Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

I loved fantasies versions of both that neither could ever, ever live up to because no mere man (or woman) has ever, ever lived up to my fantasies  which is why I have many failed relationships in my past because I was never anywhere close to satisfied with seeing another human being as an "equal",  when I am literally the goddess in a human body the significant other of God

What do you require out of someone for them to be considered a viable mate? 

I always found your infatuation to be strange over how little you'd end up actually knowing about the people in question, nor their work that made them famous in the first place. With Sam Hyde you didn't even watch any of his comedy really until like half-way into your fixation, purely because I kept repeating that you knew nothing about him as Tryp and I made references to his comedy. 

With Majlak it was much of the same, you were infatuated with a few aspects that you zeroed in on but past a point I swear I knew more about him than you did purely as an extension of my curiosity over you. 

like yeah on the outside I look as ugly  (even more because I am obese) as Jesus did in human form,  but like we both know that looks mean nothing and that we aren't even supposed to be listed after because that is innapropriate

You are so preoccupied with vanity, and I have no idea how to help you escape something like that when I am in some of the trappings of vanity as well. 🙁

now I do not really have anyone else to fantasize about because fantasizing about Jesus and him not having spiritual s**ual intercourse with me like Satan was is too humiliating, and I have been considering that maybe I am supposed to be a sexual and that maybe both Jesus and I are asexual  (as In I am "supposed" to be asexual)

Okay you lost me here, what do you mean by this portion? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

I loved fantasies versions of both that neither could ever, ever live up to because no mere man (or woman) has ever, ever lived up to my fantasies  which is why I have many failed relationships in my past because I was never anywhere close to satisfied with seeing another human being as an "equal",  when I am literally the goddess in a human body the significant other of God

What do you require out of someone for them to be considered a viable mate? 

I always found your infatuation to be strange over how little you'd end up actually knowing about the people in question, nor their work that made them famous in the first place. With Sam Hyde you didn't even watch any of his comedy really until like half-way into your fixation, purely because I kept repeating that you knew nothing about him as Tryp and I made references to his comedy. 

With Majlak it was much of the same, you were infatuated with a few aspects that you zeroed in on but past a point I swear I knew more about him than you did purely as an extension of my curiosity over you. 

like yeah on the outside I look as ugly  (even more because I am obese) as Jesus did in human form,  but like we both know that looks mean nothing and that we aren't even supposed to be listed after because that is innapropriate

You are so preoccupied with vanity, and I have no idea how to help you escape something like that when I am in some of the trappings of vanity as well. 🙁

now I do not really have anyone else to fantasize about because fantasizing about Jesus and him not having spiritual s**ual intercourse with me like Satan was is too humiliating, and I have been considering that maybe I am supposed to be a sexual and that maybe both Jesus and I are asexual  (as In I am "supposed" to be asexual)

Okay you lost me here, what do you mean by this portion? 

 

Jesus has never had spiritual s**ual intercourse with me even when I tried to fantasize about him s**ually  :/  only Satan was,  and it was either rape out of nowhere or when I would think about and give attention to the fantasy version of Michael Majlak that Satan helped me to create in my mind  (the fantasy version of him was freaking HOT  and his nose was much less noticeably massive and bulbous Lmao and his energy was actually big enough to match mine as an equal,  very much unlike the real unsatisfying Michael Majlak that Irl I would probably have zero chemistry with)

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 8:29:16 PM
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

I loved fantasies versions of both that neither could ever, ever live up to because no mere man (or woman) has ever, ever lived up to my fantasies  which is why I have many failed relationships in my past because I was never anywhere close to satisfied with seeing another human being as an "equal",  when I am literally the goddess in a human body the significant other of God

What do you require out of someone for them to be considered a viable mate? 

I always found your infatuation to be strange over how little you'd end up actually knowing about the people in question, nor their work that made them famous in the first place. With Sam Hyde you didn't even watch any of his comedy really until like half-way into your fixation, purely because I kept repeating that you knew nothing about him as Tryp and I made references to his comedy. 

With Majlak it was much of the same, you were infatuated with a few aspects that you zeroed in on but past a point I swear I knew more about him than you did purely as an extension of my curiosity over you. 

like yeah on the outside I look as ugly  (even more because I am obese) as Jesus did in human form,  but like we both know that looks mean nothing and that we aren't even supposed to be listed after because that is innapropriate

You are so preoccupied with vanity, and I have no idea how to help you escape something like that when I am in some of the trappings of vanity as well. 🙁

now I do not really have anyone else to fantasize about because fantasizing about Jesus and him not having spiritual s**ual intercourse with me like Satan was is too humiliating, and I have been considering that maybe I am supposed to be a sexual and that maybe both Jesus and I are asexual  (as In I am "supposed" to be asexual)

Okay you lost me here, what do you mean by this portion? 

 

Jesus has never had spiritual s**ual intercourse with me even when I tried to fantasize about him s**ually  :/  only Satan was,  and it was either rape out of nowhere or when I would think about and give attention to the fantasy version of Michael Majlak that Satan helped me to create in my mind  (the fantasy version of him was freaking HOT  and his nose was much less noticeably massive and bulbous Lmao and his energy was actually big enough to match mine as an equal,  very much unlike the real unsatisfying Michael Majlak that Irl I would probably have zero chemistry with)

 

 

 

and his teeth looked a lot less like rat teeth,  and he did not make those derp faces all of the time that he does  oh and he had abs and a huge cock that fit perfectly inside of me and he could go all day and night,  Instead of cumming super fast and having a small cock as he is rumored to have and do Irl

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 8:35:15 PM
Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

The change in appearance and differences in behavior would definitely suggest it's of the imagination, and your narratives when they're fresher often sounded more dream-like. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 6/15/2022 9:39:15 PM
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

moral of the story-  reality might not always feel amazing,  but It is a lot less dissapointing than when you develop a tolerance to fantasizing

 

stay in and accept reality  ✅

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 11:06:45 PM
Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

the only thing that is real to me anymore is Jesus  😇🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊✝️  love me some hope

 

 

Posts: 5714
0 votes RE: y'all were right- I never loved Michael Majlak or even Samuel Hyde

Also dogs are one thing,  but he looks like a rodent  he looks like a Rattus rattus  I used to own pet rats,  but most of them died in various tragic ways

 

I............  cannot really with his face  I cannot even look at him anymore without cringing

 

 

last edit on 6/15/2022 11:25:08 PM
10 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.