Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Again without being able to look at the talk myself I can't really contribute anything, so for now at least I'll go with the premise of your version over how it doesn't sound too warped or nutty. 

I did warn Delora about how quick you are to run to the phone and call those of an official capacity to appeal to authority, but none of that went to being about Crow. 

Yeah you both definitely didn't go to Inq and start telling him about how you both thought it could have been me that called her family 

How often do you think I have real talks with Inquirer? 

I think you might be lumping her and I together. 

 Enough for you to sperg out at MissC on a thread with crow and then you being you, any opportunity to do "behind the scenes" shit 

So because I alluded to MissComm (and Spatial) that Inquirer and I play videogames together and watch some shows while having conversations she's not privy to, that must mean I have real-talks with him about you and Crow's drama? 

Seriously, at this point you're taking a combination of character statements connected to unrelated events to justify believing I was pushing Inquirer to believe you called Crow's family, likely because you don't have somewhere to throw the energy you accumulated that had no payoff when I was like "You didn't call her family". 

Crow and I are not the same person, at the very least if you're going to tell me about my mistakes you can keep it to that. If telling you I don't think you did the call at this point isn't actually what you're looking for I'm not really sure what to do here, as this is even giving your version of events the benefit of the doubt over not knowing where to even look at the context for this claim. 

Turncoat said: 

So because I alluded to MissComm (and Spatial) that Inquirer and I play videogames together and watch some shows while having conversations she's not privy to, that must mean I have real-talks with him about you and Crow's drama? 

You asked about having real talks with Inq, i answer enough for you to sperg out at missc, i didn't specifically say you had those real talks about me and crow and what she thought i did. Only that you have had conversation with Inq. You're leading and it's annoying.

Seriously, at this point you're taking a combination of character statements connected to unrelated events to justify believing I was pushing Inquirer to believe you called Crow's family, likely because you don't have somewhere to throw the energy you accumulated that had no payoff when I was like "You didn't call her family". 

Crow and I are not the same person, at the very least if you're going to tell me about my mistakes you can keep it to that. 

 You definitely were pushing the idea that i would dox other and call their families, and or authorities. You came at me and accused me of calling crows family and then tried to manipulate me by saying that i didn't remember. 

You act as if i must be making things up to justify beliefs but it's very in line with your character to do these things. You up until recently had been of the belief that i threaten to dox crow and that i called her family, it is through what you have told me in the past that i am making these statements

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

So because I alluded to MissComm (and Spatial) that Inquirer and I play videogames together and watch some shows while having conversations she's not privy to, that must mean I have real-talks with him about you and Crow's drama? 

You asked about having real talks with Inq, i answer enough for you to sperg out at missc, i didn't specifically say you had those real talks about me and crow and what she thought i did. Only that you have had conversation with Inq. You're leading and it's annoying.

Fair enough, you didn't from this mean to say that I must have been talking to him about you and Crow's issues, but rather that he and I talk at all. 

Seriously, at this point you're taking a combination of character statements connected to unrelated events to justify believing I was pushing Inquirer to believe you called Crow's family, likely because you don't have somewhere to throw the energy you accumulated that had no payoff when I was like "You didn't call her family". 

Crow and I are not the same person, at the very least if you're going to tell me about my mistakes you can keep it to that. 

You definitely were pushing the idea that i would dox other and call their families, and or authorities. You came at me and accused me of calling crows family and then tried to manipulate me by saying that i didn't remember. 

Sucks that I can't look at the conversation in a way that would allow me to defend myself, but you have doxed people and called authorities on people. As a question of potentials you have shown yourself to go that extra mile. 

You act as if i must be making things up to justify beliefs but it's very in line with your character to do these things. You up until recently had been of the belief that i threaten to dox crow and that i called her family, it is through what you have told me in the past that i am making these statements

How recently, three years ago? 😏

You seem to take my silence over things I'm not actively thinking about to mean more, I haven't been actively thinking about you calling her house or trying to dox her at all. While I do believe you have the potential to do weird shit over the phone from other calls you've done, and have full reason to believe you would call someone's house over weird forum drama, if not hers, over how you have done at least that much before, all I can speak on is your potential rather than a history of having done it. 

I can take for granted that if you were to do such a thing that you'd not be withholding that, you do this whole "yeah I did that, what of it?" shtick. 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

So because I alluded to MissComm (and Spatial) that Inquirer and I play videogames together and watch some shows while having conversations she's not privy to, that must mean I have real-talks with him about you and Crow's drama? 

You asked about having real talks with Inq, i answer enough for you to sperg out at missc, i didn't specifically say you had those real talks about me and crow and what she thought i did. Only that you have had conversation with Inq. You're leading and it's annoying.

Fair enough, you didn't from this mean to say that I must have been talking to him about you and Crow's issues, but rather that he and I talk at all. 

Seriously, at this point you're taking a combination of character statements connected to unrelated events to justify believing I was pushing Inquirer to believe you called Crow's family, likely because you don't have somewhere to throw the energy you accumulated that had no payoff when I was like "You didn't call her family". 

Crow and I are not the same person, at the very least if you're going to tell me about my mistakes you can keep it to that. 

You definitely were pushing the idea that i would dox other and call their families, and or authorities. You came at me and accused me of calling crows family and then tried to manipulate me by saying that i didn't remember. 

Sucks that I can't look at the conversation in a way that would allow me to defend myself, but you have doxed people and called authorities on people. As a question of potentials you have shown yourself to go that extra mile. 

You act as if i must be making things up to justify beliefs but it's very in line with your character to do these things. You up until recently had been of the belief that i threaten to dox crow and that i called her family, it is through what you have told me in the past that i am making these statements

How recently, three years ago? 😏

You seem to take my silence over things I'm not actively thinking about to mean more, I haven't been actively thinking about you calling her house or trying to dox her at all. While I do believe you have the potential to do weird shit over the phone from other calls you've done, and have full reason to believe you would call someone's house over weird forum drama, if not hers, over how you have done at least that much before, all I can speak on is your potential rather than a history of having done it. 

I can take for granted that if you were to do such a thing that you'd not be withholding that, you do this whole "yeah I did that, what of it?" shtick. 

 The only time ive someone's house over weird forum drama was pink and that was to verify it was the number at all. 

I called your parents when you were basically talking about killing yourself and hadn't responded to some messages. 

Lenalee said: 

 

The only time ive someone's house over weird forum drama was pink and that was to verify it was the number at all. 

I called your parents when you were basically talking about killing yourself and hadn't responded to some messages. 

Yeah, you were the 'other one' I didn't name by name of the ones to call here, it hadn't been public domain knowledge yet. That went... really poorly. 

Also thanks for clearing up the chat log bit over DM. If there's more of these sorts of things I'm willing to talk through them. 

Nobody on here should grandstand about doxxing because I'm sure most people here would dox their enemies and maybe even their friends given the right context and opportunity.

LawOfAttraction said: 

Nobody on here should grandstand about doxxing because I'm sure most people here would dox their enemies and maybe even their friends given the right context and opportunity.

Not really, most of the time that info is dropped it seems to be on accident if not otherwise some sort of oversight or issue of perceptions. Even those who are emotionally motivated to do so seem hesitant, usually just dropping one detail as a warning or keeping it to private places. 

Only a few people here actually have experience with it, and the larger problem I've had with it is over those who act like they're better than others who have as well (or even those who haven't). Even among those with experience with it only a few expressly aim to do it as a larger attack while others share details in PMs and DMs in the hopes the other drops the information instead. 

Among those with a history of it, the majority have dropped the practice. It was much more common for Dox Drama Bombs on Luna's SC as the result of an argument, while now doxing seems to turn more spotlight on the one doing it. 

Turncoat said: 

LawOfAttraction said: 

Nobody on here should grandstand about doxxing because I'm sure most people here would dox their enemies and maybe even their friends given the right context and opportunity.

Not really, most of the time that info is dropped it seems to be on accident if not otherwise some sort of oversight or issue of perceptions. Even those who are emotionally motivated to do so seem hesitant, usually just dropping one detail as a warning or keeping it to private places. 

Only a few people here actually have experience with it, and the larger problem I've had with it is over those who act like they're better than others who have as well (or even those who haven't). Even among those with experience with it only a few expressly aim to do it as a larger attack while others share details in PMs and DMs in the hopes the other drops the information instead. 

Among those with a history of it, the majority have dropped the practice. It was much more common for Dox Drama Bombs on Luna's SC as the result of an argument, while now doxing seems to turn more spotlight on the one doing it. 

 Remember when you refused to take down pink's dox and tried to help out jim's cp spamming?

What changed

Cavalier said: 

Turncoat said: 

LawOfAttraction said: 

Nobody on here should grandstand about doxxing because I'm sure most people here would dox their enemies and maybe even their friends given the right context and opportunity.

Not really, most of the time that info is dropped it seems to be on accident if not otherwise some sort of oversight or issue of perceptions. Even those who are emotionally motivated to do so seem hesitant, usually just dropping one detail as a warning or keeping it to private places. 

Only a few people here actually have experience with it, and the larger problem I've had with it is over those who act like they're better than others who have as well (or even those who haven't). Even among those with experience with it only a few expressly aim to do it as a larger attack while others share details in PMs and DMs in the hopes the other drops the information instead. 

Among those with a history of it, the majority have dropped the practice. It was much more common for Dox Drama Bombs on Luna's SC as the result of an argument, while now doxing seems to turn more spotlight on the one doing it. 

Remember when you refused to take down pink's dox  and tried to help out jim's cp spamming ?

What changed

Like 6 years of time or some shit, it's not the same place that it used to be.