I agree with people a lot, just typically as a form of disagreeing with a different person. 😏
I otherwise tend to find it redundant to be like "I agree" or "I hear you" (unless they start complaining or something) unless there's otherwise room to take it elsewhere or elaborate on it further.
That being said I'd likely struggle to bring up a list of things I disagree with that aren't otherwise recent mostly over it being such an open ended question that spans a good deal of time, but I'll try to think of some and you can otherwise ask me my opinion on things here to help me along.
1. There's been me and a fair amount of the website agreeing against you about Bible passages, such as Spatial, Delora, BT, and even Faethers somewhat while she was still here. I've otherwise agreed with you over Bible passages a few times against others too, when you're actually correct anyway.
Discussions about other religions, like Wicca when I talk with Xena or Cain, have led to a series of similarly natured agreeings.
2. When correcting a person, I'm often enough agreeing with those beside me even if I am not like "I agree and second your notion" constantly, as we see with my blatant opinions against Challenge Seeker over her campaign against humanity. I have also numerous times agreed with Chapo for example and used him as an elaborative platform to further other arguments before his time with CS made his honesty get a bit... more questionable at points.
3. I'll from time to time drop a "Sugar and I aren't on good terms, but she's right in this case" or a "Even with our shit going on we're agreeing with eachother" as a sort of counter-weight for the shared believability demonstrating how it goes beyond petty squabbles.
4. With the Bohemian Rhapsody vs Delora situation, taking either side at any point means agreeing with one party, and many other split cases like that invite openings for it.
5. Many times with the Luna drama it was a mass agreeance from the forum itself about her problems, but referencing Luna's really reaching into the well of history to find something.
6. For a more superficial example, Tryp and I seem to agree that MrGirl isn't faking it, and otherwise seem to have nods of recognition over art.
7. There'll be obvious targets where it's hard to not agree with the peanut gallery, like when Psychopath Dave makes an appearance here or back in the day when TK would embellish.
8. Back when Legga and I recognized a problem with Inquirer's arguing style and appeal to the crowd, we were in agreeance to the point of comedy unfurling once others got involved without reading it. This eventually led to Jim mediating the two of them as the closest thing we could find to an impartial judge, and he took it surprisingly seriously.
9. I agreed back at this forum's birth that Meta would be a better admin than Luna over more self control and a swifter response time to programming problems, even with him not being Luna being reason enough.
10. Blanc.
11. Your thing about dogs and horses, I agree with the others that it's no good.
I'll try to list others as I remember them, but again when I am agreeing with people it's usually to disagree with someone else. At it's core it's still a critical energy.
