like please, because it seriously hurts my heart to read all of those false accusations
What makes them false though?
best to read the entire article that I linked, but
"Even the two main Infancy Gospels were written far too late to be considered authoritative. They also contain blatantly false content. That includes both factual mistakes about the region of Jerusalem and doctrinal ideas that contradict the inspired Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Most of the spiritual content of these Infancy Gospels aligns with Gnosticism, an early heresy plaguing the Christian church. Those immediately recognized flaws kept such works from being considered as part of the canon of Scripture."there are many reasons but ultimately, if the false gospels were considered authoritative, they would be included as part of the holy scriptures
The holy scriptures have undergone multiple revisions though, and your own beliefs aren't even fully in there.
Seems a bit silly to just discount a historical account like that over how you don't enjoy reading it.
none of my beliefs about Jesus or God contradict the Scriptures, you're an idiot