Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

 I mean i asked a question that could be answered pretty quickly as you've answered it before, so not wanting to answer it now makes it seem like she might have cheated- a misunderstanding you clear up.

Jim ended his relationship in Turkey with CS when he found her skanky drunk sleeping on the hotel bed all covered in cum.

He had flowers and chocolate with him. He threw on the wall and left.

Now they have a half baby half turkish son.

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

translation: 'I'm devastated and humiliated. if I behave like a good cuck she might take me back." 

God, this thread is hilarious. That book being written, where is it?

puppygirl said: 

LawOfAttraction said: 

puppygirl said: 

LawOfAttraction said: 

puppygirl said: 

SC was fun when it changed and had a history. Now history for SC is frozen becasue Good has no cause to fight for and barely changes the site.

I may have been a worse admin, but at least it was memorable. Chaos was the foundation of SC and now its gone. This place and its history are just dust in the wind 

if my senate had succeeded, the change would have never stopped, even after I left

 I don't disagree but at the same time.... Your senate didn't technically fail. You didn't have enough patience to sit out the criticism and make smart decisions that would have allowed people to cooperate with you more. Instead you went for heavy handed dictator tactics that allowed it to cascade into a mess and then you narc raged it off the internet. 

 Just to be clear the reason SC was deleted was because my brother Michael and I had an arguement ,and I told him to delete it even though I didn't mean it and he actually deleted it.

Boards.zone and the software I still have though. I hope to bring it back to life with another community someday in the future when money is less of an object since I will have to waste a bunch to advertise it.

SC is the only small community I know of and am a part of, but now it is stale and dying. I need to found a new community some day. Any community with more than 100 members is too impersonal.

this place will eventually die and noone will revive it when Good gets bored. SC has no fight left in it. I think schizoid-community.com might fit me better anyway

 Well if that's true I probably wouldn't continue to share software with other people. It's not just Good though you know. The users themselves could still make effort to keep it fresh and they don't seem to be doing that.

What would it require for SC to have fight, to live on? What is the fuel that keeps the place alive? Important things to ask yourself. Are these things positive? 

Your bz software isn't too bad. I personally enjoyed late stage sociopath-community. But it takes more than software to create a good active and thriving community... Especially one you'd rather stay small. Maybe you'd do better to find a community that already exists in the meantime. It will be difficult finding or founding your next SC because SC was founded long ago and has such a long history of insane tales and it would be hard to replicate something like it. But maybe you can. That's on you.

 that is impossible, for me to join another forum lol, i have been banned from everywhere i go. there is something in me that makes it really difficult for me to tolerate authority. thats why I think I might be schizoid 

This is the place you come to when you've been banned everywhere else.

LawOfAttraction said: 

This thread is for anybody to post SC stories and lore- however obscure or well known it is. Random interesting facts about the main members, throwbacks to members that left and their antics, ect. Bonus points for obscurity and originality though. I'll start with the tip of the iceberg:

-SC originated from a site called Nabble. Another associated site is sociopath world, which is still up.

-An SC member nicknames "Wormboy" once killed their grandfather and went to prison for it.

-SC once went to war with kiwifarms for a short period of time, a conflict that user Turncoat fanned the flames of.

-Original SC founder Luna Prey nukes the older version of this site in a rage due to backlash for her administrative decisions. This was the culmination of a civil war over an increase in bannings, mainly spurred by SC user Jim posting illegal content. This current version is ran by Good.

-At one point Luna Prey tried to implement a system where SC members could be voted in "elections" on the website itself to become part of an "SC senate" who theoretically could make suggestions on site changes.

-SC user Slay once posted footage of him setting a golf cart on fire illegally, resulting in prison time.

-At one point an SC user under the name Sinister committed suicide while being an active user of the website

-Former SC user Primal once formed a conspiracy theory that SC was a network of high up elitists conspiring to prey on children and ruin lives. This user compiled documents upon documents of "evidence" to this and even created a forum about it. Certain SC members were accused to be puppets of Taylor Swift, who apparently was the ringleader of this plot. Primal was eventually banned by Good because they took this to the level of even making lawsuits.

-This rendition of SC is in the same server of a former SC splinter group known as "Edge Community" ran by SC user Crave after former SC founder Luna performed a mass banning of critics.

 

These are just to get it started. More to come, and feel free to input your own stories.

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

I mean i asked a question that could be answered pretty quickly as you've answered it before, so not wanting to answer it now makes it seem like she might have cheated- a misunderstanding you clear up.

You're free to assume whatever you want, rather than pump me for further input. 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

I mean i asked a question that could be answered pretty quickly as you've answered it before, so not wanting to answer it now makes it seem like she might have cheated- a misunderstanding you clear up.

You're free to assume whatever you want. 

 Well looking back at a couple of threads, going back and reading some other stuff, it kinda looks that way. The fact that you would rather not answer in the positive or negative when you've answered questions in the like before

Has me thinking yes, because if you respected her at all you'd clear up the misunderstanding and instead you've chosen to leave it vague. Now it's just a matter of finding the other person and I've already got some guesses due to country visited and previous forum shenanigans.

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

I mean i asked a question that could be answered pretty quickly as you've answered it before, so not wanting to answer it now makes it seem like she might have cheated- a misunderstanding you clear up.

You're free to assume whatever you want. 

 Well looking back at a couple of threads, going back and reading some other stuff, it kinda looks that way. The fact that you would rather not answer in the positive or negative when you've answered questions in the like before

Has me thinking yes, because if you respected her at all you'd clear up the misunderstanding and instead you've chosen to leave it vague. Now it's just a matter of finding the other person and I've already got some guesses due to country visited and previous forum shenanigans.

 I'm liking the black background, nice on the eyes

Have fun with your theories then. 

LiYang said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Cavalier said: 

TC, if you lie or dont answer truthfully, I will be sure to correct you and fill in the gaps.

And if I say nothing? 

 I mean that in itself is an answer because it's very easy to deny untrue things

Past a point responding to it just begets more questions, and it doesn't really feel like my business to discuss it here. Overtime it's proven easier to just let people believe the wrong things as long as they're not coming from me, and it's clear that he's aiming to egg on further elaboration so that it won't be him that said things if not to dig for more answers than he otherwise has. 

If Cav is going to say things, he's going to say them, and it's not really on me when whatever he's liable to say didn't come from me. I'm keeping the business to my own, which is that I'm single now. 

I mean i asked a question that could be answered pretty quickly as you've answered it before, so not wanting to answer it now makes it seem like she might have cheated- a misunderstanding you clear up.

You're free to assume whatever you want. 

 Well looking back at a couple of threads, going back and reading some other stuff, it kinda looks that way. The fact that you would rather not answer in the positive or negative when you've answered questions in the like before

Has me thinking yes, because if you respected her at all you'd clear up the misunderstanding and instead you've chosen to leave it vague. Now it's just a matter of finding the other person and I've already got some guesses due to country visited and previous forum shenanigans.

 I'm liking the black background, nice on the eyes

 The white is so much cleaner!!

So sleek!

So nice!