Sociopath Community

LiYang said: 

Lenalee said: 

LiYang said: 

 

 

I don't have this guys book, but looks an interesting read.

 

 Well, you wouldn't find it in the COVID-19 the Great reset by Klaus Schwab because that lil passage is from Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 by John Coleman 

 Do you have the book? That's why I put the disclaimer there. I have not read the book. Should I buy this ass holes book and give him money? Or just wait it out and see what happens?

What do you think about the text? "useless eaters" disease, starvation, epidemics. basic chaos.

Any truth to it? Is there a plot to kill off humanity?

http://reparti.free.fr/schwab2020.pdf

Lenalee said: 

LiYang said 

Here is your future, looks very bad under the WEF

 

It's like you enjoy being hand fed misinformation. You get this bozo to put together edited clips and sound bites that make up this story you want to live out and you swallow it whole. 

Yuval Noah is warning against under the skin surveillance and if you had read any of his books you'd know that he's against this and calls it for the slippery slope it is. This is what he's really got to say about the lil clip that clown tried to spin into something else

 

 

Under-the-skin surveillance
In order to stop the epidemic, entire populations need to comply with certain guidelines. There are two main ways of achieving this. One method is for the government to monitor people, and punish those who break the rules. Today, for the first time in human history, technology makes it possible to monitor everyone all the time. Fifty years ago, the KGB couldn’t follow 240m Soviet citizens 24 hours a day, nor could the KGB hope to effectively process all the information gathered. The KGB relied on human agents and analysts, and it just couldn’t place a human agent to follow every citizen. But now governments can rely on ubiquitous sensors and powerful algorithms instead of flesh-and-blood spooks. 

In their battle against the coronavirus epidemic several governments have already deployed the new surveillance tools. The most notable case is China. By closely monitoring people’s smartphones, making use of hundreds of millions of face-recognising cameras, and obliging people to check and report their body temperature and medical condition, the Chinese authorities can not only quickly identify suspected coronavirus carriers, but also track their movements and identify anyone they came into contact with. A range of mobile apps warn citizens about their proximity to infected patients.  

 This kind of technology is not limited to east Asia. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel recently authorised the Israel Security Agency to deploy surveillance technology normally reserved for battling terrorists to track coronavirus patients. When the relevant parliamentary subcommittee refused to authorise the measure, Netanyahu rammed it through with an “emergency decree”.

You might argue that there is nothing new about all this. In recent years both governments and corporations have been using ever more sophisticated technologies to track, monitor and manipulate people. Yet if we are not careful, the epidemic might nevertheless mark an important watershed in the history of surveillance. Not only because it might normalise the deployment of mass surveillance tools in countries that have so far rejected them, but even more so because it signifies a dramatic transition from “over the skin” to “under the skin” surveillance. 

 Hitherto, when your finger touched the screen of your smartphone and clicked on a link, the government wanted to know what exactly your finger was clicking on. But with coronavirus, the focus of interest shifts. Now the government wants to know the temperature of your finger and the blood-pressure under its skin. 

The emergency pudding

One of the problems we face in working out where we stand on surveillance is that none of us know exactly how we are being surveilled, and what the coming years might bring. Surveillance technology is developing at breakneck speed, and what seemed science-fiction 10 years ago is today old news. As a thought experiment, consider a hypothetical government that demands that every citizen wears a biometric bracelet that monitors body temperature and heart-rate 24 hours a day. The resulting data is hoarded and analysed by government algorithms. The algorithms will know that you are sick even before you know it, and they will also know where you have been, and who you have met. The chains of infection could be drastically shortened, and even cut altogether. Such a system could arguably stop the epidemic in its tracks within days. Sounds wonderful, right?

The downside is, of course, that this would give legitimacy to a terrifying new surveillance system. If you know, for example, that I clicked on a Fox News link rather than a CNN link, that can teach you something about my political views and perhaps even my personality. But if you can monitor what happens to my body temperature, blood pressure and heart-rate as I watch the video clip, you can learn what makes me laugh, what makes me cry, and what makes me really, really angry. 

It is crucial to remember that anger, joy, boredom and love are biological phenomena just like fever and a cough. The same technology that identifies coughs could also identify laughs. If corporations and governments start harvesting our biometric data en masse, they can get to know us far better than we know ourselves, and they can then not just predict our feelings but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want — be it a product or a politician. Biometric monitoring would make Cambridge Analytica’s data hacking tactics look like something from the Stone Age. Imagine North Korea in 2030, when every citizen has to wear a biometric bracelet 24 hours a day. If you listen to a speech by the Great Leader and the bracelet picks up the tell-tale signs of anger, you are done for.

If you TLDR'D he basically says don't allow the government to use this crisis to impose even more.forms of surveillance 

 Where did he say that? I think you're reading something that isn't there.

But I agree, don't allow the government to use this crisis to impose even more forms of surveillance. Fake emergencies.

cx3 said: 

LiYang said: 

Lenalee said: 

LiYang said: 

 

 

I don't have this guys book, but looks an interesting read.

 

 Well, you wouldn't find it in the COVID-19 the Great reset by Klaus Schwab because that lil passage is from Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 by John Coleman 

 Do you have the book? That's why I put the disclaimer there. I have not read the book. Should I buy this ass holes book and give him money? Or just wait it out and see what happens?

What do you think about the text? "useless eaters" disease, starvation, epidemics. basic chaos.

Any truth to it? Is there a plot to kill off humanity?

http://reparti.free.fr/schwab2020.pdf

 Thanks for the link.

I did not find this page in the Great Reset book. Does he have another book?

Here is some criticism of the book so far.

1) Published in July 2020, but already draws a conclusion of how countries did before the fake pandemic was actually over. Why would someone rush to put out a book in the middle of a fake pandemic?

"Are there any systemic lessons to be learned relating to what has and hasn’t worked in terms of dealing
with the pandemic? To what extent does the response of different nations reveal some inner strengths and
weaknesses about particular societies or systems of governance? Some, such as Singapore, South Korea
and Denmark (among others), seemed to fare rather well and certainly better than most. Others, such as
Italy, Spain, the US or the UK, seemed to underperform on different counts, whether in terms of
preparation, crisis management, public communication, the number of confirmed cases and deaths, and
various other metrics. Neighbouring countries that share many structural similarities, like France and
Germany, had a rough equivalent number of confirmed cases but a strikingly different number of deaths
from COVID-19."

2) Obvious pro government socialism.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has made
government important again. Not just powerful again (look at those once-mighty companies begging for
help), but also vital again: It matters enormously whether your country has a good health service,
competent bureaucrats and sound finances. Good government is the difference between living and
dying”

Disagree, government has shown their incompetence, where unelected bureaucrats are practicing medicine without a license. Medical tyranny has weakened government. Anyone that thinks government is stronger after this fake pandemic has obviously been paid off.

3) Uses government data known to be false

"the flu numbers correspond to the estimated total flu
burden while the COVID-19 figures are confirmed cases"

The CDC already stated that cases were overestimated due to the false positive PCR testing AND financial bias for medical institution paid for covid cases.

Government data is biased junk

Again, why would these people write this book and jump to conclusions? Books make money I guess.

I have noticed a trend where people make statements or predictions of what they way they want the future to be.

"If I say it enough times, it will come true" "If I say a lie enough times, people will think it's truth"

This book is nothing but globalist propaganda "The book’s main objective is to help understand what’s coming in a multitude of domains." Charlatan fortune tellers

How old are you?

WEF has their own police force. This is going to be Nazi shit.

Star said: 

How old are you?

 Fuck off sociopath.

Are you an old man or not? This isn't hard

"Profiting from pain" billionaires get richer during the fake pandemic.

"peace of the grave" depopulation culling murder killing