Sociopath Community

LiYang said: 

What's funny about this, is you're a vaccine mutant. lol You and your silly consensus. You do understand the consensus at one time was that the world was flat? Consensus does not mean correct or righteous or unquestionable. How many scientist in the consensus have repeated the experiment and confirmed the data? How did they get to this consensus? Faith

and how do you know the earth is round? have you confirmed the data? Faith

Connect the dots, it's not hard for some with open minds away from the sheep like peer pressure of consensus. The biodistribution science shows the vaccine lipids go to the liver and other organs, the science shows the vaccine is reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cells in vitro. Which way you gonna bet? and where are the liver biopsies to confirm this?

The author does not even know how to interpret their own data, typical narrow focus science nerds. lol. Probably have glasses 2cm thick with tunnel vision. woooooo can't be an anti-vaxxer, lol

 

and the craziest thing, the mutant DNA gene expression increases LINE-1, the very reverse transcriptase used by the RNA to DNA conversion, a very possible positive feedback loop. YEAH!

Go ahead and ignore the authors you yourself are citing then. I'm done with you. You're beyond reason.

AppleGenius said: 

LiYang said: 

What's funny about this, is you're a vaccine mutant. lol You and your silly consensus. You do understand the consensus at one time was that the world was flat? Consensus does not mean correct or righteous or unquestionable. How many scientist in the consensus have repeated the experiment and confirmed the data? How did they get to this consensus? Faith

and how do you know the earth is round? have you confirmed the data? Faith

Connect the dots, it's not hard for some with open minds away from the sheep like peer pressure of consensus. The biodistribution science shows the vaccine lipids go to the liver and other organs, the science shows the vaccine is reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cells in vitro. Which way you gonna bet? and where are the liver biopsies to confirm this?

The author does not even know how to interpret their own data, typical narrow focus science nerds. lol. Probably have glasses 2cm thick with tunnel vision. woooooo can't be an anti-vaxxer, lol

 

and the craziest thing, the mutant DNA gene expression increases LINE-1, the very reverse transcriptase used by the RNA to DNA conversion, a very possible positive feedback loop. YEAH!

Go ahead and ignore the authors you yourself are citing then. I'm done with you. You're beyond reason.

I'm not ignoring them. I'm just saying they interpreted their data incorrectly. Or incompletely. Human Vaccinees liver biopsies need to be completed and analyzed for mutant DNA. in vivo. Answer the real question. Has the vaccine changed human DNA? I'm betting it has by the given biodistribution and liver cell data. 1. The vaccine goes to the liver. 2. The vaccine gets into liver cell's DNA upregulating LINE-1 IN 6 HOURS! BOOOOOOMMMMMMM