Whenever a woman is in trouble people are always like "Leave her alone !"
She did nothing wrong tbh
Ah I see.
*Adds data to the Lenis record*
Whenever a woman is in trouble people are always like "Leave her alone !"
She did nothing wrong tbh
Ah I see.
*Adds data to the Lenis record*
As an investor would you not be looking into the product you're investing in, especially when it sounds too good to be true? Would you not be going to other researchers in that field and making sure that shit was good?
Some people deserve to get scammed. Like the Jesus poster said, she should have claimed it to be research, but like tryp said she got the right people
Whenever a woman is in trouble people are always like "Leave her alone !"
She did nothing wrong tbh
Ah I see.
*Adds data to the Lenis record*
As an investor would you not be looking into the product you're investing in, especially when it sounds too good to be true? Would you not be going to other researchers in that field and making sure that shit was good?
Some people deserve to get scammed. Like the Jesus poster said, she should have claimed it to be research, but like tryp said she got the right people
She was propped up by the msm and made to look good. An investor can only do so much to get proof on some soon to come cutting edge tech.
It turned out the technology doesn't exist, and the investors weren't made aware they were paying for R&D.
I don't think how she went about it was good, and without a doubt the investors will claim this to be fraudulent.
Amazing how this will get her 20 years while Jessie Smollett's developing case will land him 3 years.
Whenever a woman is in trouble people are always like "Leave her alone !"
She did nothing wrong tbh
Ah I see.
*Adds data to the Lenis record*
As an investor would you not be looking into the product you're investing in, especially when it sounds too good to be true? Would you not be going to other researchers in that field and making sure that shit was good?
Some people deserve to get scammed. Like the Jesus poster said, she should have claimed it to be research, but like tryp said she got the right people
She was propped up by the msm and made to look good. An investor can only do so much to get proof on some soon to come cutting edge tech.
It turned out the technology doesn't exist, and the investors weren't made aware they were paying for R&D.
I don't think how she went about it was good, and without a doubt the investors will claim this to be fraudulent.
Amazing how this will get her 20 years while Jessie Smollett's developing case will land him 3 years.
You're saying you saw this video and you didn't immediately get wackadoodle vibes? She doesn't even explain what the fuck she's talking about.
She talks about a person without any training having this fantastical item in their home for everyday use. Like, does that not raise any red flags? to have people that have no knowledge of what exactly they're doing interpreting lab results, having tests that require quite the amount of blood to be reduced to a single prick on the finger...like. why wouldn't you ask "how"?
These investors make themselves out to seem as if they're very knowledgeable and don't think to ask such a common question or even think to check it against other labs? They deserved to be scammed
she looks good with that makeup. she does no less manipulating and illegal shit than a lot of corrupt people in positions of immense power, the only difference is she didn't have the power to protect herself. thats really the only difference between her and everyday occurrences.
but instead she's kind of more of like, a modern day robin-hood.
the irony of it being a vaccine too, of all things. ahead of her time. lol
they praise politicians for sporting a dress saying, 'eat the rich' to red carpet events. but, then when you actually do it, there is no sympathy for the takers.
(i don't condone stealing and lying morally, but just pointing out an objective view which is that manipulation and stealing does go on at a very large scale in high places. and, there is support for people with her view point, in high places. so its an interesting sociological phenomenon, that when you combine both societally accepted things, its somehow not societally accepted).
last edit on
12/8/2021 3:39:50 AM
Whenever a woman is in trouble people are always like "Leave her alone !"
She did nothing wrong tbh
Ah I see.
*Adds data to the Lenis record*
As an investor would you not be looking into the product you're investing in, especially when it sounds too good to be true? Would you not be going to other researchers in that field and making sure that shit was good?
Some people deserve to get scammed. Like the Jesus poster said, she should have claimed it to be research, but like tryp said she got the right people
She was propped up by the msm and made to look good. An investor can only do so much to get proof on some soon to come cutting edge tech.
It turned out the technology doesn't exist, and the investors weren't made aware they were paying for R&D.
I don't think how she went about it was good, and without a doubt the investors will claim this to be fraudulent.
Amazing how this will get her 20 years while Jessie Smollett's developing case will land him 3 years.
You're saying you saw this video and you didn't immediately get wackadoodle vibes? She doesn't even explain what the fuck she's talking about.
She talks about a person without any training having this fantastical item in their home for everyday use. Like, does that not raise any red flags? to have people that have no knowledge of what exactly they're doing interpreting lab results, having tests that require quite the amount of blood to be reduced to a single prick on the finger...like. why wouldn't you ask "how"?
These investors make themselves out to seem as if they're very knowledgeable and don't think to ask such a common question or even think to check it against other labs? They deserved to be scammed
most people who upset the narrative of our sociological structure in someway were deemed as crazy or as criminals, and thrown in prison.