so what is it you think i'm really doing? you're pointing out these 'inconsistencies' right? ok so what am i hiding?
generating more shitty gaslighting after i packed you in your previous one
all my points still stand, you haven't refuted any of them, you're currently ducking
Ahh, the classic obfuscation strategy of endless yammering away from the intended subject, hoping the opponent's ADD enough to lose their footing.
Tryp's a fan of it too, but it's as easy to fix as quoting the original content when they're done.
i wonder if they do it thinking it will make them seem machiavellian and in control, or is just a damage control technique for realizing you fucked up with your original narrative