Sociopath Community

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1001358/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_18.pdf

New data from the UK.

Vaccinated people are dying from covid in larger numbers.

so i get that you are upset people are going for the vaccination narrative "hook, line and sinker." my opinion of this vaccination situation has been that worldwide economic competition is fierce right now (especially between US and china), and that having the general population functioning is essential...which means a hurried and imperfect vaccination program is probably the most effective route. if some get sick, that's collateral damage; if the economy's sick and china gets a head up on microprocessor technology, etc., that's real damage.

did the virus come from a lab in wuhan? probably. was it spread intentionally? maybe. is there a cover-up on vaccines? wouldn't doubt it.

what's your endgame with this? realizing that crowd control happens on a massive scale?

I looked into this (essentially coz I'm bored and kind of sick of your rhetoric).

So the elderly and vulnerable are disproportionately more likely to be vaccinated. They are still dying from the disease despite vaccination. But your stats are demonstrating only that the protective influence of the vax is less so for vulnerable populations.

To break that down, the proportion of vax'd young people that die is substantially less than the that of unvaccinated young/less vulnerable populations. Ergo the vaccine is actually helpful, but less so for people already more likely to die of COVID.

Your inability to read data properly seems to stem from having an agenda to support. If you genuinely want something to be outraged about, look into how the CIA released weaponized syphilis into Guatemala in the 50's.

Tryptamine said: 

so i get that you are upset people are going for the vaccination narrative "hook, line and sinker." my opinion of this vaccination situation has been that worldwide economic competition is fierce right now (especially between US and china), and that having the general population functioning is essential...which means a hurried and imperfect vaccination program is probably the most effective route. if some get sick, that's collateral damage; if the economy's sick and china gets a head up on microprocessor technology, etc., that's real damage.

did the virus come from a lab in wuhan? probably. was it spread intentionally? maybe. is there a cover-up on vaccines? wouldn't doubt it.

what's your endgame with this? realizing that crowd control happens on a massive scale?

 No real end game, just following the data. Nice to see you understand the issues. Spread the word.

Outro said: 

I looked into this (essentially coz I'm bored and kind of sick of your rhetoric).

So the elderly and vulnerable are disproportionately more likely to be vaccinated. They are still dying from the disease despite vaccination. But your stats are demonstrating only that the protective influence of the vax is less so for vulnerable populations.

To break that down, the proportion of vax'd young people that die is substantially less than the that of unvaccinated young/less vulnerable populations. Ergo the vaccine is actually helpful, but less so for people already more likely to die of COVID.

Your inability to read data properly seems to stem from having an agenda to support. If you genuinely want something to be outraged about, look into how the CIA released weaponized syphilis into Guatemala in the 50's.

 Right, can't really tell from this small data set. More data and time is needed. The vaccine looks bad for old people but good for young people, how can this be?

Look at the total number of >50 actually getting covid. very small number, 1267. You can't really draw any conclusion from such small data samples. More time is needed.

There are a couple of facts from this data.

1) Vaccinated people are getting covid and dying.

2) The data show the Delta variant is less deadly