Like, for the sake of it or with a more long term goal in mind?
for the sake of acquiring wealth, to not spare anyone
wouldn't he want more believers though?
betrayal can bring more believers, those who get scammed might decide to become the predator themselves to regain a sense of control
wouldn't he want more believers though?
betrayal can bring more believers, those who get scammed might decide to become the predator themselves to regain a sense of control
but that's pretty ineffective compared to swaying them over in exchange for the promise of wealth
wouldn't he want more believers though?
betrayal can bring more believers, those who get scammed might decide to become the predator themselves to regain a sense of control
but that's pretty ineffective compared to swaying them over in exchange for the promise of wealth
pain can be a bigger driving force than pleasure/gain sometimes
wouldn't he want more believers though?
betrayal can bring more believers, those who get scammed might decide to become the predator themselves to regain a sense of control
but that's pretty ineffective compared to swaying them over in exchange for the promise of wealth
pain can be a bigger driving force than pleasure/gain sometimes
It is the way of conflict, to present yourself as the aggressor so that others will follow your example (ie: Cawk). It's quite effective, but in the end you'll find those with newfound talents seeing themselves as your enemy rather than as your business partner.
You're effectively sacrificing your diplomatic means to instead double as Mammon's wingman, but on the other hand them becoming more of a like mind could lead to reaching a mutual understanding.
