Because Putin is challenging him over something very specific
So we're just going to ignore that this is the second time Putin's tried to draw attention towards our leaders in the form of live content to get around our censor in favor of his own agenda?
It was genius when he made Trump deal with that shit, even undermining it further with not allowing Trump's own people to witness their talks. It's both an effective flex and a means of undermining our propaganda.
it seems you're putting words in my mouth as I've never said that we should ignore his constant need to display cracks in our own propaganda.
His need to display cracks in our own propaganda was my point, and if that notion needs defending, that can be done through watching how other Russian activities have been affecting the US web-space when it comes to political nudging.
Putin is challenging Biden over agreeing to a leading question asked of him. While I mostly agree with what Putin wants to do and what he said in regards to this I asked you if you knew what the script was.
When it became about that, it stopped being about Putin as it's own tangent.
If you want me to talk about what I believe that's fine, but it'll serve to tangent away from what was otherwise meant. My beliefs though are pretty debatable for accuracy, so I'd be saying them more as general theory.
This debate will never happen it will be framed as another bit of trying to meddle with American heads.
I wish it would, it has the potential for The Left to flex back if it's handled right.
Putin whether he accepts or not will get something out of it, making posing this in the first place a smart move. As the one who proposed it it also makes him seem that much 'braver' or whatever.
you're intentionally being vague about the specific script and it's coming across as if you don't know and want to appear as if you do while attempting to shame someone else.
I never said it was a specific script, just that it'd take a foreign leader to challenge said script.
It bothers me that you would accuse her of not being able to engage with you in a discussion when it was you trying to not honestly engage with her through snark
Her last points made were pretty much just character snipes, which signals to me that she's given up.
it's not unheard of that someone that doesn't live in our country doesn't know specifically what script is being challenged you could have just answered.
MissComm talks more often about US politics than her own, but I can understand why you'd try to go with the angle of "She wouldn't get it".
You're once again putting words in my mouth
This time as a joke, clearly you wouldn't say Misscomm's lacking in mental faculties to her face, and now that I've said this you're liable to feel challenged to prove that she's smart to save face. 😛
you made the claim that Putin would be challenging the government fed script she asked you what script was that and you were unable to answer and said you decided on snark.
I've otherwise answered the question, the specific script is irrelevant. The existence of scripting and it's room to be challenged by Putin in this format was my only original point being made.
I don't like arguing I'm not politically savvy so my route was to go the softest way possible in order to make you understand that you're coming off at the dick instead of just answering the question
I answered the question though, and those are two independent variables. It's not as if rude people are suddenly not answering questions, that's more of a fault on the listener for not picking them up when they caught some feels.
that you try to snark at someone and then when you get snarked back you decide to accuse them of not being able to engage in a conversation
Snark can still be a vehicle for content, while her own posting has descended into raw ad hominem, rather than simply flavoring the discussion with it to make it spicier.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
