https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/htm
I went over their methods and I don't see a way to explain the total effects observed apart from at least most of the vaccines causing many and varied issues, their assesment of confounding factors is pretty rigorous
"The overall probability (risk) of a vaccine-targeted diagnosis in the unvaccinated, however, was only 0.0123, among 13 conditions. It is important to note that zero deaths have been attributed to any vaccine-targeted diagnosis in this practice over the study period."
Although I don't want to be sensationalist, it's logical to look at each vaccine individually and way the risks and benefits. I'd much rather have some adverse effects than get smallpox for example
like the authors say: We concur with Mawson et al., 2017 [9], who reported: “Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”, but at least one of the guys involved was fired for publishing this, and it seems like there's no institutional drive to actually investigate in depth
I mean the usual autism argument from antivaxers is I think demonstribly false but it's pretty hard to ignore the ADHD line jumping from 0 to 100.. it probably is skewed in that the vast majority of people get vaccinated so naturally most ADHD people would too. but the data shows not just most but ALL. still, it's just one study, and I do think maybe the people who are more likely to get themselves or their kids diagnosed as adhd are also more likely to give them vaccines. but all the same I'm not sure that would be sufficient to explain the complete absence in the unvaccinated group, and I don't find it too hard to believe that immune response involving inflammatory cytokines could pervert a child's habits during development sufficiently to cause such an issue where it wouldn't otherwise exist, I mean inflammation is also linked to many issues including depression
food for thought anyway
