Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 13 posts
0 votes

Why hasn't the UK rejected their monarchy?


Posts: 32

Why is the UK 300 years behind every other European country? I find it so mind-blowing that a modern Western democracy could rationalize keeping a parasitic family in the manner to which they're accustomed for thousands of years without beheading them eventually.

Literally the best argument I've heard from a Brit about this is "they're a tourist attraction and part of our tradition".

If anyone here is from the UK I'd love to understand what the fuck y'all are thinking.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

God save the Queen innit m8.

It is tradition, you wouldn't get it. It's a symbol of our former glory. Something that gives us an identity, and a connection to the past. Spiritually too, the monarch is the head of the church. The royal family is important because of those factors. You globohomos won't succeed in washing away what it means to be an Englishman.

Posts: 32
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

God save the Queen innit m8.

It is tradition, you wouldn't get it. It's a symbol of our former glory. Something that gives us an identity, and a connection to the past. Spiritually too, the monarch is the head of the church. The royal family is important because of those factors. You globohomos won't succeed in washing away what it means to be an Englishman.

 Surely you'd still have most of the relics of that tradition/former glory without literally having some extra-chromosomed, buck toothed rich family living off taxpayer dollars in government property.

Your national identity might even be more accessible if average folk could actually step foot in Buckingham Palace.

Posts: 147
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

The support and existence of the Royal Family, using citizens taxes, is the embodiment that in the UK, like it or not, Aristocracy still preferred over Meritocracy.

Posts: 1687
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...
Theo said: 

God save the Queen innit m8.

It is tradition, you wouldn't get it. It's a symbol of our former glory. Something that gives us an identity, and a connection to the past. Spiritually too, the monarch is the head of the church. The royal family is important because of those factors. You globohomos won't succeed in washing away what it means to be an Englishman.

 Surely you'd still have most of the relics of that tradition/former glory without literally having some extra-chromosomed, buck toothed rich family living off taxpayer dollars in government property.

Your national identity might even be more accessible if average folk could actually step foot in Buckingham Palace.

 Lol you're so dumb

Posts: 842
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

Cut them some slack. They did just lose an empire

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...
Theo said: 

God save the Queen innit m8.

It is tradition, you wouldn't get it. It's a symbol of our former glory. Something that gives us an identity, and a connection to the past. Spiritually too, the monarch is the head of the church. The royal family is important because of those factors. You globohomos won't succeed in washing away what it means to be an Englishman.

 Surely you'd still have most of the relics of that tradition/former glory without literally having some extra-chromosomed, buck toothed rich family living off taxpayer dollars in government property.

Your national identity might even be more accessible if average folk could actually step foot in Buckingham Palace.

 What about the head of the church part? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England

The royal family represents a dignified symbol of the UK's past as well.

 

Honestly, if you are against them you are against Britain, plain and simple.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

Hehe. The Monarchy have more followers than just the Brits. I don't even mind them, sometimes. They're on our list of allies that would make life unbearable for the Americans if those banner wavers ever triedta throw any srs talk of war/hostile takeover at us.

 

Besides, the Royals are entertaining af.

Why are those obnoxious rom coms such big box office draws? Why do ppl like Brad Pitt and Ryan Reynolds get paid so frikkin much for doing little to nothing? 

Because they're good looking, well dressed, charming, and they own stuff that the rest of us can only wish we had.

 

Posts: 403
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

The royal prince is a lion. Except now that he's making a black kid, ruining the blue noble blood of the family and worrying his cousins.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: Why hasn't the UK rejec...

lol Meg is so watered down with white genes she looks Latina.

I haven't seen Archie, yet. He's probably a ginger like his dad.

 

Idk why they care who Harry fucks, anyway. Wills is the one who will take the throne when the Queen dies.

Charles is a douche. I never liked him.

I hated him even more after Diana so conveniently died.

I can't see that wrinkly old narc on the throne with that mean old cunt Camilla as the queen. Just no.

 

Wills and Kate are the golden boy and girl in that family, even if Kate is middle class and didn't have a title before she married.

10 / 13 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.