Sociopath Community

Good said: 

Cawk said: 

Good said: 

Cawk said: 

Good said: 

> works out

> throws CS on the floor

> gets a job

You may yet become a respectable citizen

 More like, foolish citizen.

1. To work out is retarded if it doesn't make you money in some way.

2. Jim got $12k from CS in hand, not counting the money they've been spending which CS covers mostly.

3. Becomes a wagecuck.

1. Working out just for money is retarded

2. CS did that to herself and this is not about Jim??

3. Only self entitled people are 'wagecucks' and only self entitled people call others that based on just having a job :P . And even then its better than being some punk.

 1. Working out to look better for women is retarded and lowkey desperation.

2. He dumped CS without making a money grab move on her, like Jim did. Now C4 a wagecuck. ;(

3. I don't think you know what wagecuck means.

1. Its for your health...

For better health, running would do much better than strengthening muscles. The guy wants to have big muscles to get chicks because he can't get them otherwise apparently.

It's 2019. You can carry weapons, guns, whatever for protection. You don't need big muscles to function in society. Big muscles are good if you are a martial artist, laborer wagecuck (you won't have to work out, you get bigger muscles while working), or to have better chances with chicks, that's it. There's no fourth reason.

2. This is not about Jim, yet again. Jim fucked CS better, is this what you wanted to hear?

LOL whattttttt

The way I heard the story, C4 didn't even take her home, but left the bar they met at after 10 minutes without doing anything with her.

This is how I heard it. I didn't know he got actually dumped by a nigger. XD

It its still about what c4 did, not what Jim did. You gotta get Jim out of your mind.

The point is, there was an easy money access opportunity for C4, and he didn't use it but since he got dumped (which I didn't know), this point is invalid.

Running is part of what i call workout. But it may not be enough depending on your body and life style. And you can do other types of workout if you like them. You don't have to be physically strong, but it feels nice, so why not?

C4 and CS both talked about what happened on discord.

CS was being pushy at C4 and he didn't want her, so he pushed her away and she hit her head. The next day she was complaining of having a headache, feeling cold and her eyes hurting when she moved them in a certain way.

Dealing with CS is not worth the money, she annoys me when she breathes. Also, he would be whoring himself out to CS for the money, whoring yourself is one thing, but to CS ? I think Jim really did like her, so he didn't whore himself, tho i was never convinced he wont screw her over in the end, even if she was playing nicer.

Spatial Mind said: 

Cawk said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Even if someone works for Ronald, that's respectable. 

 Wagecuckery is not respectable.

Well you're living at home not doing anything while the McWorkers are living at home raking in 22k a year.

Okay, where are you getting that figure from? 

The average pay for a McDonalds employee is around $9 an hour (ranging between $7 to $13). Assuming this McDonalds worker is not being given overtime (because lets be honest, these kinds of businesses are loath to pay it), they'll be saddled with no more than 40 hours. Assuming the workload is the full 40 to reach as closely to your projection as possible, that's 160 hours a month with around $1440 to show for it. 

To get even closer to your projection through idealism, and to reflect the current economic climate in relation to scummy business practices, lets assume this hypothetical wagecuck doesn't take any time off to see family, celebrate holidays, is never sick or has car trouble, none of that unproductive nonsense. 160 hours a month for 12 months adds up to around $17280, around 5k less than your prediction. 

Now lets look at taxes. Both your purchases and income are taxed here in The States (Payroll Tax), so a fraction of what was made that year is not going directly into his pocket. Practices like FICA stand to take 7.65% of your income circa 2019, so by the end of the year you actually have closer to $15958.08. 

Cost of living also piles onto this. You've gone with "Living at Home" as this one's model, so I assume you're meaning that the worker's food and rent are essentially covered, and not that he's buying his own food, paying his/her folks a portion of the rent and utilities, and otherwise partaking in a vice or two to handle the 40 hour week grind at a thankless job? Usually, by virtue of the "Living at Home" worker making his or her own income, the parent/s they'd be staying with will usually ask for at least a cut of it for their own sake (assuming you don't have rich parents or something), and if that's the case then we can expect a sizable chunk of that income to be gone through groceries, rent, electricity, etc. There's also always surprise costs, like getting an injury or having something essential break down. 

Does this worker need a car to drive to work, get groceries, and otherwise get around? Well, s/he gets to enjoy gas prices, tolls, mandatory car insurance, car repair costs, payments for the car if it wasn't paid for as one lump sum, and much more, all as a minimum cost for getting to work. The person could go for public transportation, the cost for that isn't much, but then you'd also be reliant on having a way of getting to the bus/train/whatever. If they happen to live nearby they can walk or ride a bike, but not everyone has the luxury of getting hired near where they live. Uber also remains an option, but the price is too high to even consider economically viable as a daily practice. 

Working at McDonalds also likely means eating more of their food, as that's readily available and likely slightly discounted, plus with 40 hour weeks there every week the worker's probably in half-awake grind mode. So not only is this situation of questionable sustainment not the most economically viable, but it's also terrible for your health. The typical diet there does not promote brain function and will likely stunt the dreams of advancement that worker might have once had there. Being treated like shit by your fellow employees too has a way of adding to that deterioration. 

McDonalds is one of many players for the deterioration of people. If Cawk can make money at home, consistently, it is likely a much more viable option as it's untaxed, it's faster, the upkeep required for it is significantly lower, potentially healthier, and the user's social angle of it can make for easier circumstantial mooching if that's needed for whatever reason. It also grants a lot of free time, unlike the wagecuck model, and time is worth money. 

These days having a job is more of a means of sizing up how respectable someone is, like a status symbol, but as more wageslaves put on the golden handcuffs and end up stuck in low income work the meaning and value behind a job, the "respect" of it, fades. Work is now largely seen as a prison instead of an achievement because of how few have respectable work compared to the majority... and from that likely not being where they saw themselves ending up (don't even get me started on college debt my gawd). 

Cawk said: 

>Defensiveness ? But you're on here all day and night playing the ass.

You're jealous I make money with little effort, while you have your hands full doing voodoo and watching crypto value graphs and shit all day, every day.

I could see how it'd play out like this for a typical comparison, but he strikes me as someone who'd enjoy the "voodoo" and watching "value graphs and shit". There are people out there autistic enough to enjoy watching numbers on a stock chart change. 

He talks about it in his spare time not to justify his losses, but to brag. 

Spatial Mind said:

Sure you say you do, and I saw when Jim asked you for proof and you showed nothing.

Hasn't he been posting his Amazon $'s? 

Spatial Mind said:

And believe me, it's less work than pretending to be someone else and giving dumbasses erections then fooling them into sending you money for no reason.

...it's really not that hard to dupe the dregs among internet males. What they want isn't hard to guess, and when they think they're getting it they can become progressively dumber. 

Cawk said:

1. To work out is retarded if it doesn't make you money in some way.

It's a superficial charisma boost, which isn't really useless. Looking healthy and desirable to people has a way of hacking the more logical centers of people's brains, even for those they aren't overtly attracted towards, through the appearance of success. As catfish campaigns show in spades, appearance is a powerful tool. 

Being in better health also tends to boost confidence, not just because of others seeing you in a different light, but because that exercise and a proper diet can actually boost both drive and brain function (as long as they don't juice too far and become exercise junkies). 

It's also helpful if where you live is actually somewhat threatening, as it gives a more intimidating presence. This could have you singled out if you go too far, but just under that line is safer than looking like a total Melvin. 

Good said:

1. Working out just for money is retarded

It's a means to an end, and "if you're good at something never do it for free". 

Cawk said:

1. Working out to look better for women is retarded and lowkey desperation.

It's still liable to have them be more successful within your "kids by age 30" model than not doing that. 

What people are attracted to is largely superficial based largely on recurrent yet outdated survival needs (ie: muscles for men, hourglass figure hips for women). In a Darwinian sense in lieu of our currently life hacked model it's actually quite smart to get in better shape for the passive gregarious benefits it carries, as even regular exercise does subtle things like make you smell better to people, which is actually a big deal. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Cawk said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Even if someone works for Ronald, that's respectable. 

 Wagecuckery is not respectable.

Well you're living at home not doing anything while the McWorkers are living at home raking in 22k a year.

Okay, where are you getting that figure from? 

The average pay for a McDonalds employee is around $9 an hour (ranging between $7 to $13). Assuming this McDonalds worker is not being given overtime (because lets be honest, these kinds of businesses are loath to pay it), they'll be saddled with no more than 40 hours. Assuming the workload is the full 40 to reach as closely to your projection as possible, that's 160 hours a month with around $1440 to show for it. 

To get even closer to your projection through idealism, and to reflect the current economic climate in relation to scummy business practices, lets assume this hypothetical wagecuck doesn't take any time off to see family, celebrate holidays, is never sick or has car trouble, none of that unproductive nonsense. 160 hours a month for 12 months adds up to around $17280, around 5k less than your prediction. 

Now lets look at taxes. Both your purchases and income are taxed here in The States (Payroll Tax), so a fraction of what was made that year is not going directly into his pocket. Practices like FICA stand to take 7.65% of your income circa 2019, so by the end of the year you actually have closer to $15958.08. 

Cost of living also piles onto this. You've gone with "Living at Home" as this one's model, so I assume you're meaning that the worker's food and rent are essentially covered, and not that he's buying his own food, paying his/her folks a portion of the rent and utilities, and otherwise partaking in a vice or two to handle the 40 hour week grind at a thankless job? Usually, by virtue of the "Living at Home" worker making his or her own income, the parent/s they'd be staying with will usually ask for at least a cut of it for their own sake (assuming you don't have rich parents or something), and if that's the case then we can expect a sizable chunk of that income to be gone through groceries, rent, electricity, etc. There's also always surprise costs, like getting an injury or having something essential break down. 

Does this worker need a car to drive to work, get groceries, and otherwise get around? Well, s/he gets to enjoy gas prices, tolls, mandatory car insurance, car repair costs, payments for the car if it wasn't paid for as one lump sum, and much more, all as a minimum cost for getting to work. The person could go for public transportation, the cost for that isn't much, but then you'd also be reliant on having a way of getting to the bus/train/whatever. If they happen to live nearby they can walk or ride a bike, but not everyone has the luxury of getting hired near where they live. Uber also remains an option, but the price is too high to even consider economically viable as a daily practice. 

Working at McDonalds also likely means eating more of their food, as that's readily available and likely slightly discounted, plus with 40 hour weeks there every week the worker's probably in half-awake grind mode. So not only is this situation of questionable sustainment not the most economically viable, but it's also terrible for your health. The typical diet there does not promote brain function and will likely stunt the dreams of advancement that worker might have once had there. Being treated like shit by your fellow employees too has a way of adding to that deterioration. 

McDonalds is one of many players for the deterioration of people. If Cawk can make money at home, consistently, it is likely a much more viable option as it's untaxed, it's faster, the upkeep required for it is significantly lower, potentially healthier, and the user's social angle of it can make for easier circumstantial mooching if that's needed for whatever reason. It also grants a lot of free time, unlike the wagecuck model, and time is worth money. 

These days having a job is more of a means of sizing up how respectable someone is, like a status symbol, but as more wageslaves put on the golden handcuffs and end up stuck in low income work the meaning and value behind a job, the "respect" of it, fades. Work is now largely seen as a prison instead of an achievement because of how few have respectable work compared to the majority... and from that likely not being where they saw themselves ending up (don't even get me started on college debt my gawd). 

I used Canadian pricing. And I did not include cost of living, I included living at home which in general is free, like it is for Cuck.

The rest is drawn out and off the rail. Keep it simple next time.

Turncoat said: 

Cawk said: 

>Defensiveness ? But you're on here all day and night playing the ass.

You're jealous I make money with little effort, while you have your hands full doing voodoo and watching crypto value graphs and shit all day, every day.

I could see how it'd play out like this for a typical comparison, but he strikes me as someone who'd enjoy the "voodoo" and watching "value graphs and shit". There are people out there autistic enough to enjoy watching numbers on a stock chart change. 

He talks about it in his spare time not to justify his losses, but to brag. 

If you get into investing, you might one day put in a significant amount of money. At that point your money is teetering up and down. Unless the price jumps a lot higher than what you got it for, you'll have an easier time sleeping. You wouldn't put in 10K  or 100k then go to sleep. For example, people who got Bitcoin at $1 or even at $1000 or 5k.... Don't have to worry about their capital teetering near the point of purchase.

When Bitcoin bounced off of 13K, I saw it, and when it started flash crashing, it was coming down fast, and I ended up selling it at $12,600 last time. I can still buy and sell it all day long but I don't. Focus on the larger movements. The point is to protect and grow it. Right now I'm only holding Tether USDT, aside from a little TRX as i'm expecting it to crash. If the MACD indicator tells me otherwise, I will see the price movement and buy it back. 

Also I don't usually trade Bitcoin, but I did this time, because it was outperforming my other coins so I rode it for awhile.

Why do I talk about it ? Cause I want everyone to get into cryptocurrency.

.

.

.

As for the claims of catfishing and scamming. Real or not, those things are beneath me, and so they will remain.

I had a scammer dial me up claiming to be from the CRA saying I owe taxes. I laughed. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Cawk said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Even if someone works for Ronald, that's respectable. 

 Wagecuckery is not respectable.

Well you're living at home not doing anything while the McWorkers are living at home raking in 22k a year.

Okay, where are you getting that figure from? 

The average pay for a McDonalds employee is around $9 an hour (ranging between $7 to $13). Assuming this McDonalds worker is not being given overtime (because lets be honest, these kinds of businesses are loath to pay it), they'll be saddled with no more than 40 hours. Assuming the workload is the full 40 to reach as closely to your projection as possible, that's 160 hours a month with around $1440 to show for it. 

To get even closer to your projection through idealism, and to reflect the current economic climate in relation to scummy business practices, lets assume this hypothetical wagecuck doesn't take any time off to see family, celebrate holidays, is never sick or has car trouble, none of that unproductive nonsense. 160 hours a month for 12 months adds up to around $17280, around 5k less than your prediction. 

Now lets look at taxes. Both your purchases and income are taxed here in The States (Payroll Tax), so a fraction of what was made that year is not going directly into his pocket. Practices like FICA stand to take 7.65% of your income circa 2019, so by the end of the year you actually have closer to $15958.08. 

Cost of living also piles onto this. You've gone with "Living at Home" as this one's model, so I assume you're meaning that the worker's food and rent are essentially covered, and not that he's buying his own food, paying his/her folks a portion of the rent and utilities, and otherwise partaking in a vice or two to handle the 40 hour week grind at a thankless job? Usually, by virtue of the "Living at Home" worker making his or her own income, the parent/s they'd be staying with will usually ask for at least a cut of it for their own sake (assuming you don't have rich parents or something), and if that's the case then we can expect a sizable chunk of that income to be gone through groceries, rent, electricity, etc. There's also always surprise costs, like getting an injury or having something essential break down. 

Does this worker need a car to drive to work, get groceries, and otherwise get around? Well, s/he gets to enjoy gas prices, tolls, mandatory car insurance, car repair costs, payments for the car if it wasn't paid for as one lump sum, and much more, all as a minimum cost for getting to work. The person could go for public transportation, the cost for that isn't much, but then you'd also be reliant on having a way of getting to the bus/train/whatever. If they happen to live nearby they can walk or ride a bike, but not everyone has the luxury of getting hired near where they live. Uber also remains an option, but the price is too high to even consider economically viable as a daily practice. 

Working at McDonalds also likely means eating more of their food, as that's readily available and likely slightly discounted, plus with 40 hour weeks there every week the worker's probably in half-awake grind mode. So not only is this situation of questionable sustainment not the most economically viable, but it's also terrible for your health. The typical diet there does not promote brain function and will likely stunt the dreams of advancement that worker might have once had there. Being treated like shit by your fellow employees too has a way of adding to that deterioration. 

McDonalds is one of many players for the deterioration of people. If Cawk can make money at home, consistently, it is likely a much more viable option as it's untaxed, it's faster, the upkeep required for it is significantly lower, potentially healthier, and the user's social angle of it can make for easier circumstantial mooching if that's needed for whatever reason. It also grants a lot of free time, unlike the wagecuck model, and time is worth money. 

These days having a job is more of a means of sizing up how respectable someone is, like a status symbol, but as more wageslaves put on the golden handcuffs and end up stuck in low income work the meaning and value behind a job, the "respect" of it, fades. Work is now largely seen as a prison instead of an achievement because of how few have respectable work compared to the majority... and from that likely not being where they saw themselves ending up (don't even get me started on college debt my gawd). 

I used Canadian pricing. And I did not include cost of living, I included living at home which in general is free, like it is for Cuck. 

The rest is drawn out and off the rail. Keep it simple next time.

What, the last three paragraphs? 

What might indicate that TC ?

The first paragraph mainly. The rest carried on about it and moved onto other details.

Spatial Mind said: 

The first paragraph mainly. The rest carried on about it and moved onto other details.

Turncoat said:

The average pay for a McDonalds employee is around $9 an hour (ranging between $7 to $13). Assuming this McDonalds worker is not being given overtime (because lets be honest, these kinds of businesses are loath to pay it), they'll be saddled with no more than 40 hours. Assuming the workload is the full 40 to reach as closely to your projection as possible, that's 160 hours a month with around $1440 to show for it.

This one's drawn out and off the rail..? 

You mean the paragraphs past this one right?