Guess you better get rid of these
Right, your hypocrisy was wanting the photos he'd put up of you down after spending time praising them, purely for the principle of 'wanting nothing more to do with this website'. When I'd assumed before you'd posted photos of yourself I'd dug into it and saw that, no, they were all just from BR, which then led to people questioning why your husband would put photos of you on the website against your will.
It might have been Med, she's the only other one to go full blown Karen over vanity.
Edit: Right, Med started citing whatever laws she could find and the site was eventually stuck complying.
The rule never said I couldn't change my mind about someone's pics they put up. And thank you, yes I never put up my own photos because I had an understanding of how the rules worked and wanted the ability to take my pics down for safety reasons
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
Guess you better get rid of these
Why are these pics of me so adorable
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
last edit on
1/17/2021 5:00:45 PM
Does a link of you participating in a thread where your video is linked by your husband count?
She already went through a bunch of hullabaloo the first time, when BR went 'wtf' over having photos he'd taken and uploaded himself ripped from the website over some drama she couldn't drop.
Are you just wanting images of you taken down after knowing your husband posted on here at the time, like an afterthought change? Because those don't count especially if you knew about them being put up.
As she put it last time, he puts those up against her will.
No he didn't, your full of it, br was the first one to suggest to me we get the photos taken down.
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
Does a link of you participating in a thread where your video is linked by your husband count?
She already went through a bunch of hullabaloo the first time, when BR went 'wtf' over having photos he'd taken and uploaded himself ripped from the website over some drama she couldn't drop.
Are you just wanting images of you taken down after knowing your husband posted on here at the time, like an afterthought change? Because those don't count especially if you knew about them being put up.
As she put it last time, he puts those up against her will.
Actually it went more like good said it had to be treated like a dox to be taken down...... It was br,s idea to take it down, and when he had me text good, good explained to me what had to be done in order to do so, and I explained it to br, and br was willing.
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
Does a link of you participating in a thread where your video is linked by your husband count?
She already went through a bunch of hullabaloo the first time, when BR went 'wtf' over having photos he'd taken and uploaded himself ripped from the website over some drama she couldn't drop.
Are you just wanting images of you taken down after knowing your husband posted on here at the time, like an afterthought change? Because those don't count especially if you knew about them being put up.
As she put it last time, he puts those up against her will.
But if she was participating in those threads where her pictures were posted, those should be fine right? Regardless of whether she or her husband posted them
Nope, all of them. As she put it they are being put up there against her will, and her not otherwise saying for him to take them down is just her being too cowed by him to speak her mind about how much she hates him doing that.
As long as she's not posting selfies of herself her face is effectively blacklisted from SC. It's a stupid technicality, but she argued with her husband over it to the point of making him look foolish and storm off angrily.
No he was planning to leave before that for the same drama that had us take the pics down, was the same drama that had us both leave after said same drama escalated
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
So yeah you eventually admitted I was right about not posting myself, yet you changed the rule based on thinking I did, and now that you admit it, you start still trying to "look right" by falsely recalling the situation of br,s relationship with the images being taken down. He was the one who suggested to me, they be taken down. And he was the one, who told me to go ahead and say it was a dox. Stop filling in the gaps of things you were not behind the scenes for with me being evil and shit, damn
The labrat devours the scientist, if given the chance. As the rat is nothing but a tool to the scientist, the rat may still consume his dead flesh.
last edit on
1/17/2021 4:59:27 PM
So tc is saying that the new criteria is to take down someone's sc repost of themselves that someone else puts up which would not really be a dox, they did this for kkk, they said well we had to take down a repost that delora put up of herself, however that's not true prove it and go get the post where I post this same image lena put up on sc, otherwise you are basing the entire rule change on a lie. Actually go get any post where I post my face. Go do it or your a shitty mod who bases rule changes on biased assumptions you make to be all buddy buddy with lena's shit fest. Otherwise users can just make things up without you fact checking them and you can just rewrite the fabric of sc if the person making the claim is liked by you enough. (Quoted response posts do not count) if you can't provide this you are a terrible mod and I proved it and I should be mod.
What the fuck are you even trying to say. What's an "sc repost of themselves"?