First CS and now Med. She couldn't trap him into dating her with that pokemon bet, so she's gonna try the old fashion way. Let's help Chapo out with some information and ideas or just plain dissuade him?
Gypsy had it right when she said this;
9
posts
The combination of their genetics, coupled with Med's parenting style...
With her stubbornness and his fry-cutting determination we might have a paragon on our hands.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
1/2/2021 7:15:01 PM
Why you on Chapos side though? He is clearly the bad guy and you should hate that he treats a mentally ill woman like his fuel stop for money. Do you hate yourself so much and feel so undesirable that you need to kick a woman that is on the ground and is basically being abused, Lena?
last edit on
1/2/2021 7:19:55 PM
Why you on Chapos side though? He is clearly the bad guy and you should hate that he treats a mentally ill woman like his fuel stop for money. Do you hate yourself so much and feel so undesirable that you need to kick a woman that is on the ground and is basically being abused, Lena?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Why you on Chapos side though? He is clearly the bad guy and you should hate that he treats a mentally ill woman like his fuel stop for money. Do you hate yourself so much and feel so undesirable that you need to kick a woman that is on the ground and is basically being abused, Lena?
He's just a prostitute, she's trying to arrange entrapment.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
One of the most frequently asked questions of Virginia family law attorneys is how a parent’s parental rights can be terminated. Often times a custodial parent wants to terminate the rights of the noncustodial parent because (s)he is not paying support, has not seen the child in years, and or is not a positive influence in the child’s life. Other times the noncustodial parent wants to terminate their own parental rights in an effort to avoid paying child support. Termination of parental rights is extremely serious. If a parent’s rights are terminated (s)he no longer has any parental responsibility, including financial, and can at no point in the future legally ask to be involved in the child’s life.
In Virginia, the parental rights of one parent can be terminated only if there is a third party, such as a step-parent, willing to step into that parent’s role. Many single parents struggle with hearing this information because they feel as though their hands are tied. They question the logic of a law that allows a parent who is not financially supporting his or her child and is not a good influence to continue to be involved in the child’s life.
The honest answer is that everything comes down to money and finances. Without a third party to legally assume the parental role, the Court would be creating a greater chance of the child becoming an orphan and possibly a ward of the state. If that happens, then the Commonwealth of Virginia would become responsible for financially supporting that child. The Commonwealth does not want to terminate the rights of any parent, unless there is another person to step into that (financial) role, because the Commonwealth wants, if needed, to seek financial support from that parent.
Or also
Kansas man is garnering national attention because he is being required to pay child support after donating sperm to a lesbian couple. The Kansas man, William Marotta, answered an online advertisement to donate sperm to a lesbian couple. In 2009 the couple and Mr. Marotta entered into an agreement in which he gave up his parental rights to the lesbian couple and was absolved of any financial responsibility.
After the birth of the child, the lesbian couple ended their relationship. The child received more than $6,000 in state benefits. As in Virginia, Kansas requires that the Department of Children and Families (or the Department of Social Services in Virginia) attempt to recuperate those expenses through biological parents.
The state of Kansas says that because Mr. Marotta did not work through a clinic or doctor, as the state law requires, he can be held responsible for support of the child.
Virginia Code Section 20-158 states that a donor, as defined in Virginia Code Section 20-156, is not the parent of a child conceived through assisted conception, unless the donor is the husband of the gestational mother. In Virginia, it is very unlikely that Mr. Marotta would be held responsible for support of the child.
The issue of who was considered a “donor” was recently litigated in Virginia. The Virginia Court of Appeals sided with a Virginia Beach man who donated sperm to his longtime girlfriend. This ruling overturned a Circuit Court opinion that he lacked parental rights after the couple split up.
Billy Breit (who happens to be an attorney in Virginia Beach) and Beverly Mason conceived their daughter through in vitro fertilization. Before the birth, the couple signed a joint custody and visitation agreement in case they split. They also signed an affidavit stating that Breit was the child’s biological father. The couple parted ways when the child was four months old. Nine months after the split, Mason abruptly stopped allowing Breit to visit his child.
Mason’s attorneys argued that Breit was not the child’s legal father, citing Virginia Code 20-156 and Virginia Code Section 32.1-257, which states that “donors of sperm or ova shall not have any parental rights or duties for any child.”
Breit’s lawyers argued to the Court of Appeals that the cited sections of law were meant to prohibit anonymous sperm donors from making parental claims. The Court of Appeals agreed, and called the Circuit Court opinion a “manifest absurdity” that “ignores the intent of the legislature.”
If the Court of Appeals had upheld the ruling of the Circuit Court, it would have established a precedent that any couple who used any form of assisted conception would be engaging in an activity that could result in the father having no parental rights
Why you on Chapos side though? He is clearly the bad guy and you should hate that he treats a mentally ill woman like his fuel stop for money. Do you hate yourself so much and feel so undesirable that you need to kick a woman that is on the ground and is basically being abused, Lena?
You should get to know med better.
Sc is pretty boring.
Why you on Chapos side though? He is clearly the bad guy and you should hate that he treats a mentally ill woman like his fuel stop for money.
Do you think Chapo is not mentally ill as well?
9
posts