https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NQGQImrpx4
Alright this video's a bit ridiculous, and I'm a bit confused as to why you thought I was it's target audience. As usual he sounds good for about 1/2 to 2/3 of it, but the endings always fall flat or hit strangely, conflating odd areas together while implying it's the human condition rather than his own situation.
Some notes:
"When you're socially anxious and you go to a party your heart's beating, why? The party's a monster! Why? Because it's judging you. It's judging you it's putting you low down the dominance hierarchy because that's what a negative judgement is, and that interferes with your sexual success, and that means you're being harshly evaluated by nature itself."
So you are confronting the Dragon of Chaos when you go into the social situation.
> Hunching over at parties is because of parties being tyrannical.
> Constant victim appeasement.
> Implies social skills must be learned.
> Suggests that nervousness is self-focused and that I (the audience) isn't really paying attention to them.
I have trouble self-directing unless it's a tangent from another person, making for someone who self-directs second-handedly. Rather than having to be told that I need to learn how to listen to other people, I need to learn how to listen to myself more and rebuke other people if I don't want to end up swamped with their issues.
> Constant dominance implications.
"It's useful to have discussions with your enemies, because they will tell you things you do not know, and that's such a great thing because if you don't know them, well, you're not very smart are you?"
Jeez he's straight up trying to insult his audience as bait towards his rhetoric, as if they need to be challenged towards it by being called weak.
I'm comfortable with weak, it's strong that's a challenge.
His target audience there seem to be people that struggle with social anxiety. I think he is straight hitting the essence about that disorder with the monster comparison and the inward self attention etc. Of course, people could learn more reading the wikipedia article, but it feels cooler and deeper the way he explains it and in a way through that may be able to get to people that need this. Of course he is coked up and 70% marketing with nazi sexappeal, but you need this if you want to get money from american people.
Even Contra's given him props somewhat as one of the few people an incel can model off of that might get them out of their black pill funk, but how his rhetoric appeals to people is through visiting a mindset that I don't really identify with.
His goal here seemed to be to try to make selfish people see selfish reasons to not be selfish, but unless they're simple they ought to see it for the steering it is.
The dragon of chaos.... lol Jesus christ.
So much of what this guy says floats the implication that his audience are not responsible for themselves, that their issues are somehow something that the world is inflicting upon them.
I also think it's pretty telling about his target audience that the advice he gives them to deal with other people is to notice that they're there in the first place. : P