No, you 2 will have to meet and film yourselves shaking hands for me.
That's the only way I'll believe that TPG is not Jason.
They not the same person, they don't even look anything alike
Don't tell her that, it's enjoyable to watch her fully commit to her delusions.
Doubting her tends to strengthen the narrative actually.
A person is offering to change a belief pending solid photographic evidence, like any good scientist.
I hate to burst your bubble, cupcake. But that's not what defines a delusion. Google that if you want :D
Photographs can be altered tho, i can pay jason 80$ to take a picture with some random and have them both hold up papers that say tpg / Jason and show you as well
A person is offering to change a belief pending solid photographic evidence, like any good scientist.
I hate to burst your bubble, cupcake. But that's not what defines a delusion. Google that if you want :D
So delusional she can't accept she's delusional ✔️
That's why I specified that TPG and Turncoat would have to meet and film themselves shaking hands. As in on a moving video.
I'll add in a crowd and beside moving water to that, just in case their editing skills are better than I thought :D
I can still pay someone to do that and film it with tc even, and it wouldn't be tpg it would be some random. Would you still take that as evidence?
A person is offering to change a belief pending solid photographic evidence, like any good scientist.
I hate to burst your bubble, cupcake. But that's not what defines a delusion. Google that if you want :D
So delusional she can't accept she's delusional ✔️
Reasoning so circular she's too dizzy to see herself in her projections :D
I'm serious. Get on google and look at the DSM for a proper textbook definition of what a delusion is :D
A person is offering to change a belief pending solid photographic evidence, like any good scientist.
That sounds more like what a good journalist would go for, not a scientist. We otherwise have more than enough to go on over those two being different people than even the criteria for Inquirer Evidence.
Pretty sure you just want to think TPG's older to help something unrelated.
A person is offering to change a belief pending solid photographic evidence, like any good scientist.
That sounds more like what a good journalist would go for, not a scientist. We otherwise have more than enough to go on over those two being different people than even the criteria for Inquirer Evidence.
lol ikr. A good scientist wouldn't waste their time in a shithole like this arguing with you ppl about sock puppets.
