More than 2 parties exist and pretending like every one has to vote for one of the two most popular just shrinks people's options and gives us worse and worse candidates
You'd need to actually push for social change if you want what you did to mean anything, as doing the vote by yourself is just as well and good as voting for Mickey Mouse.
It's my right to vote and I voted for the person I saw as the best fit.
You could have accomplished just as much by throwing the mail-in ballot into the trash and eating snacks.
Your argument is effectively that it's your right to accomplish absolutely nothing, which... I guess it is, but why bother doing a something that amounts to nothing when you could just do nothing?
I voted. I did push for change. If 3rd party candidates start getting higher percents of votes more bipartisan normies will start seeing them as valid. It's amazing you wrote these two comments together and didnt see your own contradiction
Do you really believe that would happen, though? That the entrenched two-party monopoly on our government can be untangled as easily as more people voting third party?
To butt in like a butt-inner.
Yes, that is entirely possible. I'm amazed there weren't more 3rd party voters considering the past 2 elections. As a gradual process, it's entirely possible more and more people start voting 3rd party until it becomes actually viable. Though it would take a while to gain traction. But when it does, oh boy, THIRD PARTY PRESIDENT TIME!!!
EDIT: after consulting https://www.statista.com/statistics/1134513/third-party-performance-us-elections/ it seems like the trend is actually paradoxically reversed. Ayyy lmao. This is how democracy dies, in thunderous american applauses.