Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 18 posts
0 votes

User Vs User


Posts: 798

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

 Oh, but of course. That is what a debate is. But only when there's something worth debating.

Many times there's an absurdity in clashing fundamentally unprovable ideas against each other. Being civil when that happens, is simply impossible, because the only logical conclusion that someone mature can come to, is to agree to disagree.

As such, it's often the case that it shouldn't even be a debate. But a series of HONEST questions the sides pose each other to gain understanding of their respective stances.

But does that happen?

No.

It's a debate. We clash those ideas absurdly.

And as such, any tactic becomes valid.

I must simply spell it out for pseudo-deep pseudo-intelectuals on the daily. And, as my just punishment to them, I will make them feel bad through the "debate" they instigate to boost their fragile egos.

Much like I'm doing to you now. I stated only truths, and yet you smugly try to contradict me. Why?

For what reason?

Frustrated much?

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

 Oh, but of course. That is what a debate is. But only when there's something worth debating.

Many times there's an absurdity in clashing fundamentally unprovable ideas against each other. Being civil when that happens, is simply impossible, because the only logical conclusion that someone mature can come to, is to agree to disagree.

As such, it's often the case that it shouldn't even be a debate. But a series of HONEST questions the sides pose each other to gain understanding of their respective stances.

But does that happen?

No.

It's a debate. We clash those ideas absurdly.

And as such, any tactic becomes valid.

I must simply spell it out for pseudo-deep pseudo-intelectuals on the daily. And, as my just punishment to them, I will make them feel bad through the "debate" they instigate to boost their fragile egos.

Much like I'm doing to you now. I stated only truths, and yet you smugly try to contradict me. Why?

For what reason?

Frustrated much?

 You stated no truths. Just postulated your opinion as fact. Simply a testament to your undeserved arrogance.

What a god damn monologue. I regret even reading that rhetoric.

Get off your god damn soap-box, and actually talk to me. What seems to be the issue with you?

 

Your anti-intelectual stance is nihilistic and purely destructive to any greater good. Who are you to look down on people as you do? I'm telling you, this stance on its own is superficial, arrogant, and actually 100% pseudo-intellectual.

So I must say again, get off your damn soap-box and actually talk to people, you god damn autist.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

 Oh, but of course. That is what a debate is. But only when there's something worth debating.

Many times there's an absurdity in clashing fundamentally unprovable ideas against each other. Being civil when that happens, is simply impossible, because the only logical conclusion that someone mature can come to, is to agree to disagree.

As such, it's often the case that it shouldn't even be a debate. But a series of HONEST questions the sides pose each other to gain understanding of their respective stances.

But does that happen?

No.

It's a debate. We clash those ideas absurdly.

And as such, any tactic becomes valid.

I must simply spell it out for pseudo-deep pseudo-intelectuals on the daily. And, as my just punishment to them, I will make them feel bad through the "debate" they instigate to boost their fragile egos.

Much like I'm doing to you now. I stated only truths, and yet you smugly try to contradict me. Why?

For what reason?

Frustrated much?

 You stated no truths. Just postulated your opinion as fact. Simply a testament to your undeserved arrogance.

What a god damn monologue. I regret even reading that rhetoric.

Get off your god damn soap-box, and actually talk to me. What seems to be the issue with you?

 

Your anti-intelectual stance is nihilistic and purely destructive to any greater good. Who are you to look down on people as you do? I'm telling you, this stance on its own is superficial, arrogant, and actually 100% pseudo-intellectual.

So I must say again, get off your damn soap-box and actually talk to people, you god damn autist.

 No.

You're not worthy of me getting off my soap-box, until you prove sufficient mental capacities, and adherence to decency.

Until then, you're just a spoiled child getting its deserved intellectual spanking.

 

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

 Oh, but of course. That is what a debate is. But only when there's something worth debating.

Many times there's an absurdity in clashing fundamentally unprovable ideas against each other. Being civil when that happens, is simply impossible, because the only logical conclusion that someone mature can come to, is to agree to disagree.

As such, it's often the case that it shouldn't even be a debate. But a series of HONEST questions the sides pose each other to gain understanding of their respective stances.

But does that happen?

No.

It's a debate. We clash those ideas absurdly.

And as such, any tactic becomes valid.

I must simply spell it out for pseudo-deep pseudo-intelectuals on the daily. And, as my just punishment to them, I will make them feel bad through the "debate" they instigate to boost their fragile egos.

Much like I'm doing to you now. I stated only truths, and yet you smugly try to contradict me. Why?

For what reason?

Frustrated much?

 You stated no truths. Just postulated your opinion as fact. Simply a testament to your undeserved arrogance.

What a god damn monologue. I regret even reading that rhetoric.

Get off your god damn soap-box, and actually talk to me. What seems to be the issue with you?

 

Your anti-intelectual stance is nihilistic and purely destructive to any greater good. Who are you to look down on people as you do? I'm telling you, this stance on its own is superficial, arrogant, and actually 100% pseudo-intellectual.

So I must say again, get off your damn soap-box and actually talk to people, you god damn autist.

 No.

You're not worthy of me getting off my soap-box, until you prove sufficient mental capacities, and adherence to decency.

Until then, you're just a spoiled child getting its deserved intellectual spanking.

 

 Man, debating you on this is boring

I'm not interested in the subject actually. I don't give a shit. I just.baited you into paying attention to me and toyed with your feelings lmfao.

Get rely kid I win.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

In this thread I will debate myself.

I'm the most worthy opponent after all.

 No you won't. It's just a shitpost like most of your posts. There's nothing to debate.

Worthy opponent to what, showering?

 I have actually hidden nuggets of meaning and wit in my shitposts, and even made some actually meaningful contribution. Perhaps you are too dim witted and blind to see them.

And no, I'll have you know I do shower daily. Your reasoning stinks.

The pinnacle of debates is simply a smug attitude. You win through it, take notes, I'm schooling you here.

 What meaning? And you call those cheap ironic shots "wit"?

Pathetic.

You know, you're just someone with too much free time on his hands. If you got time to larp as a teacher to "school" people, how about doing something productive for once huh?

 And don't make me laugh with that random reference. Trying to make a joke out of this. Deflecting much?

No. To debate is to clash ideas against each other in a constructive manner. Not this sort of narcissistic crap where you instrumentally try to manipulate the narrative and "win" the debate regardless of you being right or wrong. That's just ego-fuel for losers.

 Oh, but of course. That is what a debate is. But only when there's something worth debating.

Many times there's an absurdity in clashing fundamentally unprovable ideas against each other. Being civil when that happens, is simply impossible, because the only logical conclusion that someone mature can come to, is to agree to disagree.

As such, it's often the case that it shouldn't even be a debate. But a series of HONEST questions the sides pose each other to gain understanding of their respective stances.

But does that happen?

No.

It's a debate. We clash those ideas absurdly.

And as such, any tactic becomes valid.

I must simply spell it out for pseudo-deep pseudo-intelectuals on the daily. And, as my just punishment to them, I will make them feel bad through the "debate" they instigate to boost their fragile egos.

Much like I'm doing to you now. I stated only truths, and yet you smugly try to contradict me. Why?

For what reason?

Frustrated much?

 You stated no truths. Just postulated your opinion as fact. Simply a testament to your undeserved arrogance.

What a god damn monologue. I regret even reading that rhetoric.

Get off your god damn soap-box, and actually talk to me. What seems to be the issue with you?

 

Your anti-intelectual stance is nihilistic and purely destructive to any greater good. Who are you to look down on people as you do? I'm telling you, this stance on its own is superficial, arrogant, and actually 100% pseudo-intellectual.

So I must say again, get off your damn soap-box and actually talk to people, you god damn autist.

 No.

You're not worthy of me getting off my soap-box, until you prove sufficient mental capacities, and adherence to decency.

Until then, you're just a spoiled child getting its deserved intellectual spanking.

 

 Man, debating you on this is boring

I'm not interested in the subject actually. I don't give a shit. I just.baited you into paying attention to me and toyed with your feelings lmfao.

Get rely kid I win.

 Damn, likewise. I was merely playing into it to see you post more. I don't actually give a damn. I'm the one who won tho. Peace out luser lmao.

Posts: 798
0 votes RE: User Vs User

Damn this looks so silly.

Two idiots engaging in pointless arguments because they scraped each others egos. 

The drama. The sheer energy of it. It makes me soo alive! It bring colour in a gray existence. This. This is art!

How wonderful. I'll be looking forward to your mutual clownery gentlemen.

10 / 18 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.