:^)
I love when people defensively link this stuff.
I'm not being defensive but calling them out.
I know, I was making a general comment.
You don't fit the expected bill to need to defensively use this stuff.
Theres a lot more questions scientists cant answer, why chose those specifically?
i didnt watch them all tho, its boring after having seen 1000ts of videos like this one
#10
Actually some of those scientists can answer, but none of those can be answered without science.
Including number 10, so theists can't answer it either.
+ If you say that theists can answer it, because they believe in it, so they say god exists, then atheists can also answer it and say god doesn't exist, because they don't believe in it.
Only the pretentious agnostics that also claim to not be atheists can't. See you either believe in god, or you do not, its a belief, not a question. If you are agnostic and you believe in god, then you are not agnostic, therefor you must not believe in god to be agnostic and if you do not believe in god, then you are an atheist as well as an agnostic. Being agnostic is not the moderate middle between theist and atheist, its on a different spectrum.
So in reality, everyone can answer that question if we use belief and no one can if we don't.
I never understood why Christians try linking stuff that shows things both groups don't know as proof that Science is wrong.
Like really, we never said that Science has all the answers, just that it's a process towards getting answers (although I guess to someone who thinks all the answers are in The Bible it'd just look like a blasphemous waste of time).
Including number 10, so theists can't answer it either.
+ If you say that theists can answer it, because they believe in it, so they say god exists, then atheists can also answer it and say god doesn't exist, because they don't believe in it.
But through their faith they claim to be able to be contacted through dreams and loose symbology.
Atheists can't contact the nothingness, or if they can they won't likely ever get a meaningful reply that isn't just silence.
Only the pretentious agnostics that also claim to not be atheists can't. See you either believe in god, or you do not, its a belief, not a question. If you are agnostic and you believe in god, then you are not agnostic, therefor you must not believe in god to be agnostic and if you do not believe in god, then you are an atheist as well as an agnostic.
What if someone believes in "A Force", or some other concept that isn't specifically God?
Being agnostic is not the moderate middle between theist and atheist, its on a different spectrum.
Agnoticism is the midground as it's a Centrist perspective: "I don't know if there is or isn't a God, but I reserve enough doubt to not pin it towards either option". Most I've spoken with think something did all of this, but that either they don't know who did or that it's "beyond human comprehension" or some excuse like that.
Kuffar, all of you
Out of agnosticism, atheism and having a set faith I find atheism to be the worst of the three.
At least with agnosticism and faith you recognize on a certain level you don't hold the answers to existence. And although faith reaches too far for me, to assume the understanding of existence is held to god(s) at least they recognize themselves and their understanding as beneath something.
Atheist strike me as not only ignorant but arrogant, that there is nothing because of our small understanding of this existence. I've also noted from personal experience atheist tend to be self-absorbed in this concept as it plays a central theme in their life. Nihilism and depression are central themes in all 5 I have known well. While my friends with faith are moral upstanding people, with long term goals, heavy family emphasis and happy with their lives
Summary: Chad Hopeful Agnostics > Faith > Virgin Atheism