No winners today as he lands on a mid-tier number.
6.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Also taking a break to examine turncoat's experiment in futility here. What do you want from us turncopath? To see how susceptible we are to games like this? To gambling?
TELL ME YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS.
1. Consistency within Habits; I've been able to watch myself adjust to this task like a timeline, which has given me somewhat of a model for observing my own room to adapt and streamline the steps. He does it every day as well as part of his own ritual, and it's been fun to watch him go through it by proxy as a side-participant. It gives me the room to go outside of myself and see my own adaptation from a third person view with the room to compare it to his own shifts, even for little things like growing his facial hair out or growing more adjusted to the format.
2. His picks are not truly random, as we're seeing with the odds readouts. For a bit this had me and some others curious as to why, with Peach coming up with a pretty believable theory.
3. Community Interaction; Much like when TK was still around responding the same to everyone as she's been known to do, so too can we count on Lynch to keep posting them. This gives us the room to see how people react within the constraints of witnessing consistency, and along the way it pulls various people into it based on different trends and patterns, based on what's socially going on in the moment in conjunction with whim and chance. Seeing as we're around 120 numbers in now, that's given us a decent range for notes. It also gives the room for superstitions and side-traditions, such as having witnessed Peach's insane luck streak.
4. I wanna win, and I wanted to see if anyone'd start betting more on these numbers or not once it became an understood constant. I also want to see this to the end, I want to see Lynch stop before I would on my own.
5. I became more into the idea originally after videos like this one:
Combining some of his principles with some woke Alan Watts-isms and junk has made for a difference in my own perspective overtime.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
2/21/2021 5:17:29 PM
Are they really not truly random? Can we get lega in with some Bayesian analysis of the statistics?
The draw stats show too much weight towards some versus others. Peach theorized that the two sets are likely from different packs on the notion of how they aren't commonly sold in sets of 10, and how that may be affecting the likelihood of what does and doesn't sink to the bottom for his picks.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
2/22/2021 4:10:18 AM
