Sociopath Community

Pastel_Rose said: 

Silence fell... then everyone turned to Turncoat and asked: "So, what's it gonna be?"

To which she replied,

"meow"

I disagree with this parody, I'd say something much more long winded and contrived instead of monosyllabic-yet-predictable absurdity, like explaining how much can be conveyed in a simple meow instead of just meowing. 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

Tryptamine said: 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

 Then replace your name with Waltz, I've heard you say incredibly violent and fucked up things when you drink, since i already put slay as the pyro i couldnt think of anyone better for the sadist

Pastel_Rose said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

 Then replace your name with Waltz, I've heard you say incredibly violent and fucked up things when you drink, since i already put slay as the pyro i couldnt think of anyone better for the sadist

I feel as if you don't quite get me, which is fine. It's not like I often make clear statements about what I am doing in those situations. Thus, your perception is understandable.

A lot of what you are referring to of what I do is shock humor, or shock for the sake of whatever is going on. Intensity can heighten a situation, or cause pandemonium. It creates interesting scenarios. But I will explain more.

I grew up around a lot of violence. As a receiver, an observer, and myself an abuser of others. Around 17 or 18, the violent aspect relaxed, and around 27, the general antisocial components of me relaxed. There is a component of my mind that can revert to that way of being, and I find humor in indulging that aspect. Mainly because of how others receive it.

I think if you reflect on our interactions, I've been reasonable and kind. I imagine Alice might say the same about my interactions with her. Perhaps I have some erratic moments, but overall I consider myself a positive net influence.

All things considered, I am aware of how confrontational and upsetting I can be. Even how sadistic my words can be at times. But consider my other sides as well.

Tryptamine said: 

Pastel_Rose said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

Then replace your name with Waltz, I've heard you say incredibly violent and fucked up things when you drink, since i already put slay as the pyro i couldnt think of anyone better for the sadist

I feel as if you don't quite get me, which is fine.

I feel like you feel like this quite often, and would prefer for it to be the case. 

Tryptamine said: 

A lot of what you are referring to of what I do is shock humor, or shock for the sake of whatever is going on. Intensity can heighten a situation, or cause pandemonium. It creates interesting scenarios. But I will explain more.

Post-Irony

New Sincerity

Pretending to Pretend

I think if you reflect on our interactions, I've been reasonable and kind. I imagine Alice might say the same about my interactions with her.

Considering the context, are you saying that Peach and Alice are animals? 

It's otherwise unrelated. 

 Perhaps I have some erratic moments, but overall I consider myself a positive net influence.

I mean, of course you would. 

All things considered, I am aware of how confrontational and upsetting I can be. Even how sadistic my words can be at times. But consider my other sides as well.

Why shield yourself with "other sides" when you could instead work on improving yourself? 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Pastel_Rose said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

Then replace your name with Waltz, I've heard you say incredibly violent and fucked up things when you drink, since i already put slay as the pyro i couldnt think of anyone better for the sadist

I feel as if you don't quite get me, which is fine.

I feel like you feel like this quite often, and would prefer for it to be the case. 

Not really. I feel if anything, ambiguity is a sort of ego defense. People who interact with me on a consistent basis know that I typically try to dispose of those kinds of barriers.

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Pastel_Rose said: 

Tryptamine said: 

I don't like animal torture; I'd be a voice against it.

Then replace your name with Waltz, I've heard you say incredibly violent and fucked up things when you drink, since i already put slay as the pyro i couldnt think of anyone better for the sadist

I feel as if you don't quite get me, which is fine.

I feel like you feel like this quite often, and would prefer for it to be the case. 

Not really. I feel if anything, ambiguity is a sort of ego defense. People who interact with me on a consistent basis know that I typically try to dispose of those kinds of barriers.

Most cases of people that "know you" tend to just be people who've gone through your "Good Listener" routine, and once they start making judgement calls over how much they claim to know you you're immediately back to accusing them of "not quite getting you". 

"You don't get me, but that's fine" is a pat on your own back over hipster "mindfulness" and a cope to divert the accusations. Have you thought to ask yourself where these perceptions come from? 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

A lot of what you are referring to of what I do is shock humor, or shock for the sake of whatever is going on. Intensity can heighten a situation, or cause pandemonium. It creates interesting scenarios. But I will explain more.

Post-Irony

New Sincerity

Pretending to Pretend

I think if you reflect on our interactions, I've been reasonable and kind. I imagine Alice might say the same about my interactions with her.

Considering the context, are you saying that Peach and Alice are animals? 

It's otherwise unrelated. 

 Perhaps I have some erratic moments, but overall I consider myself a positive net influence.

I mean, of course you would. 

All things considered, I am aware of how confrontational and upsetting I can be. Even how sadistic my words can be at times. But consider my other sides as well.

Why shield yourself with "other sides" when you could instead work on improving yourself? 

You're becoming redundant, trying to dissect me over several threads over the course of this week.

I don't have an obligation to try to explain every thought process I have that you wish to delve into, when you wish to break things piece-by-piece many times I make a post. You've been unresponsive to my contentions with the format of how you approach dialogue, and also to my thoughts in general. It fosters an unwillingness in me to bother with response.