No it's not an expression of weakness. Being scared is a fear response. Fear is a healthy normal brain response. I don't think fear should ever bee seen as a weakness.
Fear is weakness, but what's weaker than that is the fear of fear.
It's braver to state that you feel afraid of things, braver even than someone born with an inability to feel fear from having a challenge to face that said fearless one couldn't even fathom, but past a point you're just justifying why you're afraid instead of facing the fear-of-fear.
...oh my god I'm going to drop this because I'm not going to play this game with you.
Because you are, above all things, the most theatrical/ dramatic lil shit I've ever come across.
I have never denied this, and let be honest you enjoy doing the same thing despite how much self-justification you force yourself to face before you let yourself have fun.
I am a good girl and do not approve of this message.
Based on her history, yes.
If she joined this forum as a moralfag it'd be one thing, but as Slay pointed out it's obviously a front of weakness. Even if she believes herself at this point our chat logs and forum posts make a case of butthurt fleeing with ad homs as excuses.
Again, remove the pedophilia from him and she'd just be yelling "Misogynist". Get rid of the misogyny and it'd just be another excuse. The only real factor here is that she feels targetted and beaten down by someone who's "beneath her", unlike how she treated Delora and BR.
But there's no need to remove the pedophilia as that is one of his biggest traits even if it was for shock value. You keep wanting to invalidate her reasoning by removing that but it's a well known fact that he's a Pedophile.
So for the sake of argument then, it's weak to block someone who's beaten you unless they're a pedophile or a misogynist?
Its not weak to use a function that was made to be used on this forum.
I didn't make it known that I was doing a silly game of radio silence that'd make her sperg for like 2+ years? Weird, I thought my stating that was part of the problem for you.
Meanwhile, how do you see Jim reacting to her blocking him, yet constantly feeling the need to remind him?
She explains her reasoning and all you have to offer is that it's not good enough for you. Jim has made his own jab in this thread tho.
She explains her reasoning in direct contradiction to her history, and all you have to offer is what she's saying in the moment?
"Wah wah, Jim jabbed at her once after she made a scene, it must be his fault now."
I DO NOT SOUND LIKE THAT HOW DARE YOU.
No I'm saying that you're here saying that she's making a jab at him while having it blocked while he's made a jab as well. She's given her reason and you refuse accept it because that doesn't stick with what you think of her and that's *okay*. She doesn't have to further explain just because you won't accept it or because you call her weak.
I had a response for this but seeing the horoscope term it's flown out of my head and quite honestly I hate this.
The resemblance is uncanny, you can't deny it just because of your handicapped 'horrorscope' forever, not once you've seen enough of it.
It's really funny to go to websites where you see people commenting on their astrological sun signs, 99/100 times your sign's bitching identically about being called toxic so blatantly, but for real it's a bunch of Don Drapers waiting for the right environment to enable themselves.
I fucking hate every fucking one of you horoscope bitches. I don't even know who the fuck don draper is
Again I'm not calling you weak but if you're forcing me to use your standard then I suppose that's what I would call you instead of scared. Again your not blocking is a personal preference just like peaches blocking of him is her own personal preference.
The difference is that I'm not hiding from her words (in fact I seek them out, they're comedy), while Peach is straight triggered by seeing his. While we both choose to not interact with the person in question, is that really the only factor worth looking at?
Why play dumb and overly generalize this for the sake of argument here, because it's a man bullying a woman?
They're both women to me tbh, and you are in a sense hiding from her if you refuse to directly communicate and rather do an audience commentary where you feel safest.
Why are we dragging this out when all it amounts to is that you don't approve of someone doing something for themselves because you think your entertainment will run out from this block?