Sociopath Community

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

To give a better response: I don't really care about this stuff, I can go in. You said you didn't, but here a thread is about it. I don't mind discussing any of it, but I'm just not entirely interested in creating drama at this time. I gave out my thoughts and we can discuss them if you want. Otherwise, I'm bored of this topic.

Who do you figure is pushing this drama at us this time? 

It looks like Alena from this thread's context, but I guess it's Sugar bringing it up on the forum. She was all "You can ask him", so I figured "Why not, these stories are insane and I'm sure he's on the same page." 

 It's totes me tbh fam

Why spread a ridiculous story like that like it's truth tho? 

 Why would syst lie about you and crow talking about taking bats to tryps shit over a laptop that died 6 months after he left on top of a hotel rooftop tho?

Why indeed. 

 Very interesting and very mysterious.

Be real, do I seem like the violence as retribution type? Does Syst being like "I think they meant it" really mean more than him reading character poorly? 

Knowing syst and that he's not really the type to lie about stuff like that especially with how much enjoyed his time with y'all, I just don't see why he would lie about something like that.

How subject to interpretation would you say that his stories tend to be? 

Dk, is he lying? 

Lying vs not in that I appeared to him that I'd beat someone with a bat based on a gag that he started? I can't really help if his judge of character zigged where it ought to have zagged. 

It'd be better to ask him how violent of a person I seemed, though, as so far I just see you (and Sug) saying it without him defending the claim. You're likely taking what he said out of proportion or through an extremely rough interpretation, again, like how you accounted for his "dark humor" and "memes" in a literal fashion. 

I don't know, I do think you'd talk about it even if it was in a joking manner. 

We're not talking about if it came up though, we're talking about his claims of if the bat references were or weren't a joking matter. 

It's not the same thing. 

(Also: "be real"? How dare you. This as good a rendering as you're gonna get)

Instead of continuing to drag his credibility all over the place, we ought to have him clear this up for us. 

Next time he's around instead of MIA, we'll direct him here. 

Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ...

He didn't really comment in any other topics either though right? 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

To give a better response: I don't really care about this stuff, I can go in. You said you didn't, but here a thread is about it. I don't mind discussing any of it, but I'm just not entirely interested in creating drama at this time. I gave out my thoughts and we can discuss them if you want. Otherwise, I'm bored of this topic.

Who do you figure is pushing this drama at us this time? 

It looks like Alena from this thread's context, but I guess it's Sugar bringing it up on the forum. She was all "You can ask him", so I figured "Why not, these stories are insane and I'm sure he's on the same page." 

 It's totes me tbh fam

Why spread a ridiculous story like that like it's truth tho? 

 Why would syst lie about you and crow talking about taking bats to tryps shit over a laptop that died 6 months after he left on top of a hotel rooftop tho?

Why indeed. 

 Very interesting and very mysterious.

Be real, do I seem like the violence as retribution type? Does Syst being like "I think they meant it" really mean more than him reading character poorly? 

Knowing syst and that he's not really the type to lie about stuff like that especially with how much enjoyed his time with y'all, I just don't see why he would lie about something like that.

How subject to interpretation would you say that his stories tend to be? 

Dk, is he lying? 

Lying vs not in that I appeared to him that I'd beat someone with a bat based on a gag that he started? I can't really help if his judge of character zigged where it ought to have zagged. 

It'd be better to ask him how violent of a person I seemed, though, as so far I just see you (and Sug) saying it without him defending the claim. You're likely taking what he said out of proportion or through an extremely rough interpretation, again, like how you accounted for his "dark humor" and "memes" in a literal fashion. 

But I'm asking you: were you and crow on the rooftop of a hotel 'joking' about taking a bat to tryps shit in revenge for having dropped your laptop and causing it to malfunction 6 months later?

I don't know, I do think you'd talk about it even if it was in a joking manner. 

We're not talking about if it came up though, we're talking about his claims of if the bat references were or weren't a joking matter. 

It's not the same thing. 

I'm saying I don't know whether or not you'd actually have it in you to physically harm someone, but I could totes see you talking shit. That there would be maybe some joke intent aside from busting kneecaps.

(Also: "be real"? How dare you. This as good a rendering as you're gonna get)

Instead of continuing to drag his credibility all over the place, we ought to have him clear this up for us. 

Next time he's around instead of MIA, we'll direct him here. 

Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ...

He didn't really comment in any other topics either though right? 

 Ah, I don't remember. I'd have to check back on dates.

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Dk, is he lying? 

Lying vs not in that I appeared to him that I'd beat someone with a bat based on a gag that he started? I can't really help if his judge of character zigged where it ought to have zagged. 

It'd be better to ask him how violent of a person I seemed, though, as so far I just see you (and Sug) saying it without him defending the claim. You're likely taking what he said out of proportion or through an extremely rough interpretation, again, like how you accounted for his "dark humor" and "memes" in a literal fashion. 

But I'm asking you: were you and crow on the rooftop of a hotel 'joking' about taking a bat to tryps shit in revenge for having dropped your laptop and causing it to malfunction 6 months later?

Why ask that when that was already answered multiple times now? You're changing the goal posts from what it meant to what was said, when the reference to it was never the question. 

I don't know, I do think you'd talk about it even if it was in a joking manner. 

We're not talking about if it came up though, we're talking about his claims of if the bat references were or weren't a joking matter. 

It's not the same thing. 

I'm saying I don't know whether or not you'd actually have it in you to physically harm someone, but I could totes see you talking shit. That there would be maybe some joke intent aside from busting kneecaps.

You think my style of "talking shit" is about violence instead of either some shpeal about them hurting themselves or otherwise being socially driven to a bad place? Have you ever seen me do that over the years of knowing me that we've spoken? 

It's not like I don't make jokes about violent stuff, but violent idealization doesn't really do anything for me. 

Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ...

He didn't really comment in any other topics either though right? 

 Ah, I don't remember. I'd have to check back on dates.

Are you suggesting that he'd want to avoid this topic? Why? 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Dk, is he lying? 

Lying vs not in that I appeared to him that I'd beat someone with a bat based on a gag that he started? I can't really help if his judge of character zigged where it ought to have zagged. 

It'd be better to ask him how violent of a person I seemed, though, as so far I just see you (and Sug) saying it without him defending the claim. You're likely taking what he said out of proportion or through an extremely rough interpretation, again, like how you accounted for his "dark humor" and "memes" in a literal fashion. 

But I'm asking you: were you and crow on the rooftop of a hotel 'joking' about taking a bat to tryps shit in revenge for having dropped your laptop and causing it to malfunction 6 months later?

Why ask that when that was already answered multiple times now? You're changing the goal posts from what it meant to what was said, when the reference to it was never the question. 

Okay so there's two time frames

You're referring to USA time frame where y'all were in a house and there was bats that y'all made jokes about busting kneecaps. This is what you're talking about going far as to tell tryp "you were there."  

I'm referring to time frame out of USA, out of that house in [censored] city, and on top of a hotel roof top roughly 6 months after tryp had left y'all and had accidentally dropped your laptop and possibly making it malfunction (6 months later- on top of a roof top). 

It's not changing goalposts if I'm asking for clarification for a certain event while you're confusing it for a very different event.  

Why do you not want to answer? If it's not true, then syst lied. If it is true, syst didn't lie and you and crow were talking shit and that's nothing really new. 

I don't know, I do think you'd talk about it even if it was in a joking manner. 

We're not talking about if it came up though, we're talking about his claims of if the bat references were or weren't a joking matter. 

It's not the same thing. 

I'm saying I don't know whether or not you'd actually have it in you to physically harm someone, but I could totes see you talking shit. That there would be maybe some joke intent aside from busting kneecaps.

You think my style of "talking shit" is about violence instead of either some shpeal about them hurting themselves or otherwise being socially driven to a bad place? Have you ever seen me do that over the years of knowing me that we've spoken? 

It's not like I don't make jokes about violent stuff, but violent idealization doesn't really do anything for me. 

In the time that I've known you, I can agree to the first half, yes you do that. 

But also knowing that while with a certain person you stopped being an observer and started taking action to affect certain events so it's not a far thing for me to think you could get caught up in that moment when with this person.  My own experience with this person- I know they're capable of violent idealization if just to talk shit. So I think that at times you can get caught up in the moment. 

Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ...

He didn't really comment in any other topics either though right? 

 Ah, I don't remember. I'd have to check back on dates.

Are you suggesting that he'd want to avoid this topic? Why? 

 Only saying I should check before implying something like that, I could be wrong. 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Dk, is he lying? 

Lying vs not in that I appeared to him that I'd beat someone with a bat based on a gag that he started? I can't really help if his judge of character zigged where it ought to have zagged. 

It'd be better to ask him how violent of a person I seemed, though, as so far I just see you (and Sug) saying it without him defending the claim. You're likely taking what he said out of proportion or through an extremely rough interpretation, again, like how you accounted for his "dark humor" and "memes" in a literal fashion. 

But I'm asking you: were you and crow on the rooftop of a hotel 'joking' about taking a bat to tryps shit in revenge for having dropped your laptop and causing it to malfunction 6 months later?

Why ask that when that was already answered multiple times now? You're changing the goal posts from what it meant to what was said, when the reference to it was never the question. 

Okay so there's two time frames

You're referring to USA time frame where y'all were in a house and there was bats that y'all made jokes about busting kneecaps. This is what you're talking about going far as to tell tryp "you were there."  

Yes, which establishes the joke's referential room to be repeated. 

I'm referring to time frame out of USA, out of that house in [censored] city, and on top of a hotel roof top roughly 6 months after tryp had left y'all and had accidentally dropped your laptop and possibly making it malfunction (6 months later- on top of a roof top). 

So... you're saying that a joke can't resurface months later? 

It's not changing goalposts if I'm asking for clarification for a certain event while you're confusing it for a very different event.  

It basically is. 

It's you going for surrounding details to avoid where you screwed up so that you can try to salvage something from it. Again, it was never a question if there were jokes about busting 'caps, the question has been over if it's "more than a joke", what you've been saying that Syst otherwise said to you. 

I'd trust his word on this over yours, as I've already seen you screw up interpreting his meaning more than once. While he is prone to impressionism when he tells a story, you tend to misunderstand that and warp the tales even further when it comes to him in particular for some reason. 

Why do you not want to answer? If it's not true, then syst lied. If it is true, syst didn't lie and you and crow were talking shit and that's nothing really new. 

I haven't been avoiding the question..? 

I don't know, I do think you'd talk about it even if it was in a joking manner. 

We're not talking about if it came up though, we're talking about his claims of if the bat references were or weren't a joking matter. 

It's not the same thing. 

I'm saying I don't know whether or not you'd actually have it in you to physically harm someone, but I could totes see you talking shit. That there would be maybe some joke intent aside from busting kneecaps.

You think my style of "talking shit" is about violence instead of either some shpeal about them hurting themselves or otherwise being socially driven to a bad place? Have you ever seen me do that over the years of knowing me that we've spoken? 

It's not like I don't make jokes about violent stuff, but violent idealization doesn't really do anything for me. 

In the time that I've known you, I can agree to the first half, yes you do that. 

Where have I commented on violent daydreams? 

But also knowing that while with a certain person you stopped being an observer and started taking action to affect certain events so it's not a far thing for me to think you could get caught up in that moment when with this person. 

My own experience with this person- I know they're capable of violent idealization if just to talk shit. So I think that at times you can get caught up in the moment. 

Based on what? 

Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ...

He didn't really comment in any other topics either though right? 

 Ah, I don't remember. I'd have to check back on dates.

Are you suggesting that he'd want to avoid this topic? Why? 

 Only saying I should check before implying something like that, I could be wrong. 

"Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ..." doesn't look like an innocent statement. 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Okay so there's two time frames

You're referring to USA time frame where y'all were in a house and there was bats that y'all made jokes about busting kneecaps. This is what you're talking about going far as to tell tryp "you were there."  

Yes, which establishes the joke's referential room to be repeated. 

I'm taking systs side here because I don't see any reason for him have seen that as a serious threat rather than a joke. 

I'm referring to time frame out of USA, out of that house in [censored] city, and on top of a hotel roof top roughly 6 months after tryp had left y'all and had accidentally dropped your laptop and possibly making it malfunction (6 months later- on top of a roof top). 

So... you're saying that a joke can't resurface months later? 

Sure it can, but that joke was being made with everyone in the room. taking a bat to tryps shit was made on top of a rooftop without 2 key people: tryp & syst. Syst walked into that. It was also- according to syst, coming from the fact that the laptop was malfunctioning. So even you have to understand the difference between making a joke about a prop vs. Talking about taking a bat to tryps shit because your laptop was malfunctioning and you think it's malfunctioning because tryp bumped or dropped it. 

Because you see that doesn't sound like a joke anymore, it sounds like you wanting to get back at him for your property being damaged. 

 

It's not changing goalposts if I'm asking for clarification for a certain event while you're confusing it for a very different event.  

It basically is. 

It's you going for surrounding details to avoid where you screwed up so that you can try to salvage something from it. Again, it was never a question if there were jokes about busting 'caps, the question has been over if it's "more than a joke", what you've been saying that Syst otherwise said to you. 

It really isn't because I'm asking you to clarify events and characters where as you're refusing to actually answer if this rooftop even happened because you keep going back to some jokes that were made in a nother time frame.  There's really nothing to have screwed up other than I confused laptop with sink 

There was not time frame actually referenced here until you brought it in. 

 

I'd trust his word on this over yours, as I've already seen you screw up interpreting his meaning more than once. While he is prone to impressionism when he tells a story, you tend to misunderstand that and warp the tales even further when it comes to him in particular for some reason. 

Meh, I'll give you that I guess. 

Why do you not want to answer? If it's not true, then syst lied. If it is true, syst didn't lie and you and crow were talking shit and that's nothing really new. 

I haven't been avoiding the question..? 

WERE YOU AND CROW ON A HOTEL ROOF TOP TALKING ABOUT TAKING A BAT TO TRYPS SHIT COS YOUR LAPTOP WAS MALFUNCTIONING YES OR NO?

You think my style of "talking shit" is about violence instead of either some shpeal about them hurting themselves or otherwise being socially driven to a bad place? Have you ever seen me do that over the years of knowing me that we've spoken? 

It's not like I don't make jokes about violent stuff, but violent idealization doesn't really do anything for me. 

In the time that I've known you, I can agree to the first half, yes you do that. 

Where have I commented on violent daydreams? 

No no, the other half, my bad.

But also knowing that while with a certain person you stopped being an observer and started taking action to affect certain events so it's not a far thing for me to think you could get caught up in that moment when with this person. 

Based on what? 

Pink? The person you were involved during that incident?

My own experience with this person- I know they're capable of violent idealization if just to talk shit. So I think that at times you can get caught up in the moment. 

So you're now trying to say that I was swept up by the two of them talking about breaking Tryp's legs? 

Still talking about one particular person. Who's the other one? 

Are you suggesting that he'd want to avoid this topic? Why? 

 Only saying I should check before implying something like that, I could be wrong. 

"Oh hey that sounds like a great idea, he was here when I explained why this was going around in this thread, I wonder why he didn't chime in ..." doesn't look like an innocent statement. 

 Nothing looks innocent to you, but I was wondering why he didn't chime in since he was logged in at the time I wrote(typed?) It because it was 2/15 which was at the same day he and sug were arguing about something he did or didn't say and I posted the screen because I am very helpful like that. 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Okay so there's two time frames

You're referring to USA time frame where y'all were in a house and there was bats that y'all made jokes about busting kneecaps. This is what you're talking about going far as to tell tryp "you were there."  

Yes, which establishes the joke's referential room to be repeated. 

I'm taking systs side here because I don't see any reason for him have seen that as a serious threat rather than a joke. 

Why not have Syst discuss Syst's side here?

I just see you continuing to interpret what you think he meant, something, as mentioned earlier, that you already have a poor history with. 

I'm referring to time frame out of USA, out of that house in [censored] city, and on top of a hotel roof top roughly 6 months after tryp had left y'all and had accidentally dropped your laptop and possibly making it malfunction (6 months later- on top of a roof top). 

So... you're saying that a joke can't resurface months later? 

Sure it can, but that joke was being made with everyone in the room. taking a bat to tryps shit was made on top of a rooftop without 2 key people: tryp & syst. Syst walked into that.

He didn't "walk into it", he was there, and a part of the jokes. If he however far later told you a reinvented version of it based on where you'd left his head at about her and I where he's some sort of hero that calmed Crow and I down from the beginnings of a violent conspiracy, that's not really on me. 

It does have me wonder what other sorts of self-embellishing stories he could have gone on about though, considering how weirdly you had him behaving when he was living with us and you two were a thing. 

It was also- according to syst, coming from the fact that the laptop was malfunctioning.

So you're going to take the fact that he added two and two together poorly to be a real case? This is straight justification so that you can hold onto what you'd rather think. 

Again, I'd like to see his version at this point, as I just see you speaking for him poorly. I doubt he'd back up the drama you're trying to monger (and judging the age of this story he's likely corrected others assuming similar falsehoods already), so now the question is more over why you're trying to use his name to justify your own poor arguments here. 

So even you have to understand the difference between making a joke about a prop vs. Talking about taking a bat to tryps shit because your laptop was malfunctioning and you think it's malfunctioning because tryp bumped or dropped it. 

Because you see that doesn't sound like a joke anymore, it sounds like you wanting to get back at him for your property being damaged. 

You always take things to alarmist extremes, this is literally insane to believe and I don't think Syst thinks this about me. 

Again, it's like your going on about how someone making some racist jokes is immediately a racist, you're now saying that making violence jokes when someone's out of the room immediately amounts to a humorless conspiracy. 

It's not changing goalposts if I'm asking for clarification for a certain event while you're confusing it for a very different event.  

It basically is. 

It's you going for surrounding details to avoid where you screwed up so that you can try to salvage something from it. Again, it was never a question if there were jokes about busting 'caps, the question has been over if it's "more than a joke", what you've been saying that Syst otherwise said to you. 

It really isn't because I'm asking you to clarify events and characters where as you're refusing to actually answer if this rooftop even happened because you keep going back to some jokes that were made in a nother time frame.  There's really nothing to have screwed up other than I confused laptop with sink 

Check the older posts and you'll see how you keep trying to change the focal point. 

I'd trust his word on this over yours, as I've already seen you screw up interpreting his meaning more than once. While he is prone to impressionism when he tells a story, you tend to misunderstand that and warp the tales even further when it comes to him in particular for some reason. 

Meh, I'll give you that I guess. 

Why do you not want to answer? If it's not true, then syst lied. If it is true, syst didn't lie and you and crow were talking shit and that's nothing really new. 

I haven't been avoiding the question..? 

WERE YOU AND CROW ON A HOTEL ROOF TOP TALKING ABOUT TAKING A BAT TO TRYPS SHIT COS YOUR LAPTOP WAS MALFUNCTIONING YES OR NO?

I wasn't. I was quite mad about the laptop, it was my baby and the guy was a walking bulldozer, but there wasn't any serious discussion about "reparations" in the form of bodily harm, and to take it as further than that only has the room to do so from that being where you'd rather take it. 

But also knowing that while with a certain person you stopped being an observer and started taking action to affect certain events so it's not a far thing for me to think you could get caught up in that moment when with this person. 

Based on what? 

Pink? The person you were involved during that incident?

The Pink situation was a principle battle over the rules, and it's clear that no number of times saying this will clear that for you even though you saw things otherwise back when you were a part of it. 

I'd also love if you stopped using Crow as my justification for off behaviors, it rids of my individual autonomy about as much as saying that you were just Pray's underling (if not more so). 

My own experience with this person- I know they're capable of violent idealization if just to talk shit. So I think that at times you can get caught up in the moment. 

So you're now trying to say that I was swept up by the two of them talking about breaking Tryp's legs? 

Still talking about one particular person. Who's the other one? 

I edited that line out when I realized why you "they"-'d. I thought you were implying for a second that Syst and Crow were discussing breaking his 'caps in a serious tone, and that it'd swept me up. 

Instead, I see that it was just a continued, obvious attempt on your part to try to smear the name of someone who's otherwise been gone for years. 

when me and sister were kids, my narc mom, when feeling ignored and unimportant, and observing me and my sister playing happily and loving each other, she would start telling each other bad things about the other like "she said x about you" "she thinks you are annoying" and shit like that to separate us and so we will redirect our love and attn to her.

its really sad when a pair of thots that hit the wall cant deal with being ignored and not liked anymore so they have to divide and conquer their way to relevance and drum up drama to make their boring lives interesting. go do a travel or play some ball outside or some shit.

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Turncoat said: 

Khepri said: 

Okay so there's two time frames

You're referring to USA time frame where y'all were in a house and there was bats that y'all made jokes about busting kneecaps. This is what you're talking about going far as to tell tryp "you were there."  

Yes, which establishes the joke's referential room to be repeated. 

I'm taking systs side here because I don't see any reason for him have seen that as a serious threat rather than a joke. 

Why not have Syst discuss Syst's side here?

I just see you continuing to interpret what you think he meant, something, as mentioned earlier, that you already have a poor history with. 

Are you asking me to leave this alone until he answers?

I'm referring to time frame out of USA, out of that house in [censored] city, and on top of a hotel roof top roughly 6 months after tryp had left y'all and had accidentally dropped your laptop and possibly making it malfunction (6 months later- on top of a roof top). 

So... you're saying that a joke can't resurface months later? 

Sure it can, but that joke was being made with everyone in the room. taking a bat to tryps shit was made on top of a rooftop without 2 key people: tryp & syst. Syst walked into that.

He didn't "walk into it", he was there, and a part of the jokes. If he however far later told you a reinvented version of it based on where you'd left his head at about her and I where he's some sort of hero that calmed Crow and I down from the beginnings of a violent conspiracy, that's not really on me. 

It does have me wonder what other sorts of self-embellishing stories he could have gone on about though, considering how weirdly you had him behaving when he was living with us and you two were a thing. 

He told me this waaaaaaaaay later, after we were a thing. Like way later.

 

It was also- according to syst, coming from the fact that the laptop was malfunctioning.

So you're going to take the fact that he added two and two together poorly to be a real case? This is straight justification so that you can hold onto what you'd rather think. 

Again, I'd like to see his version at this point, as I just see you speaking for him poorly. I doubt he'd back up the drama you're trying to monger (and judging the age of this story he's likely corrected others assuming similar falsehoods already), so now the question is more over why you're trying to use his name to justify your own poor arguments here. 

I don't really see it as drama mongering but w.e.

So even you have to understand the difference between making a joke about a prop vs. Talking about taking a bat to tryps shit because your laptop was malfunctioning and you think it's malfunctioning because tryp bumped or dropped it. 

Because you see that doesn't sound like a joke anymore, it sounds like you wanting to get back at him for your property being damaged. 

You always take things to alarmist extremes, this is literally insane to believe and I don't think Syst thinks this about me. 

Again, it's like your going on about how someone making some racist jokes is immediately a racist, you're now saying that making violence jokes when someone's out of the room immediately amounts to a humorless conspiracy. 

Someone making racist jokes is usually a bit racist, it's called casual racism 

It's not changing goalposts if I'm asking for clarification for a certain event while you're confusing it for a very different event.  

It basically is. 

It's you going for surrounding details to avoid where you screwed up so that you can try to salvage something from it. Again, it was never a question if there were jokes about busting 'caps, the question has been over if it's "more than a joke", what you've been saying that Syst otherwise said to you. 

It really isn't because I'm asking you to clarify events and characters where as you're refusing to actually answer if this rooftop even happened because you keep going back to some jokes that were made in a nother time frame.  There's really nothing to have screwed up other than I confused laptop with sink 

Check the older posts and you'll see how you keep trying to change the focal point. 

I'd trust his word on this over yours, as I've already seen you screw up interpreting his meaning more than once. While he is prone to impressionism when he tells a story, you tend to misunderstand that and warp the tales even further when it comes to him in particular for some reason. 

Meh, I'll give you that I guess. 

Why do you not want to answer? If it's not true, then syst lied. If it is true, syst didn't lie and you and crow were talking shit and that's nothing really new. 

I haven't been avoiding the question..? 

WERE YOU AND CROW ON A HOTEL ROOF TOP TALKING ABOUT TAKING A BAT TO TRYPS SHIT COS YOUR LAPTOP WAS MALFUNCTIONING YES OR NO?

I wasn't. I was quite mad about the laptop, it was my baby and the guy was a walking bulldozer, but there wasn't any serious discussion about "reparations" in the form of bodily harm, and to take it as further than that only has the room to do so from that being where you'd rather take it. 

Oh wow, an answer.

The Pink situation was a principle battle over the rules, and it's clear that no number of times saying this will clear that for you even though you saw things otherwise back when you were a part of it. 

I'd also love if you stopped using Crow as my justification for off behaviors, it rids of my individual autonomy about as much as saying that you were just Pray's underling (if not more so). 

Oh! Does that annoy? Gee Ive never gone through this so I just can't relate.

I edited that line out when I realized why you "they"-'d. I thought you were implying for a second that Syst and Crow were discussing breaking his 'caps in a serious tone, and that it'd swept me up. 

Instead, I see that it was just a continued, obvious attempt on your part to try to smear the name of someone who's otherwise been gone for years. 

 It's not a smear, it's sharing my own experience of what happened at that time.

Bottom line, this is silly to continue without the storyteller in question.