Sociopath Community

I do agree we should kill those who'd jeopardize the group

Slay said: 

I do agree we should kill those who'd jeopardize the group

 Agreed.

Another huge issue. We have too many leader type people.  I dont want to be butting heads with 6 other people who have leader oriented personalities. The arguing gets nowhere.

People that would hold down the group and should be killed:

Aub

Cs

Jim and cawk (sorry dudes, you would be helpful but you'd tear apart the group on purpose)

Sugar (similar reason)

Med (you're a danger to yourself)

While the rest of you are scrambling for scraps, Alice and I are safe and comfortable with the supplies and guns we've been stocking for the last year. 

Yall waited too late. Medical masks already sold out at every retailer around major cities. 1/4 of you will not survive.

soap is not edible dum dum

influenza data

2018 34157 deaths 36 million cases 0.1% dead

2017 61099 deaths 45 million cases 0.1% dead

2016  38230 deaths 29.2 million cases  0.1% dead

corona virus, if you can believes the small sample numbers from the Chinese.

400 deaths 20,000 cases 2.0% dead. The contra virus is 20 times more deadly than past influenza.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2018-2019.html

PalePeach said: 

While the rest of you are scrambling for scraps, Alice and I are safe and comfortable with the supplies and guns we've been stocking for the last year. 

Yall waited too late. Medical masks already sold out at every retailer around major cities. 1/4 of you will not survive.

 Ok everyone. Kill the lesbians and take their guns

On the real, in this scenario the virus has been wiped out. So medical masks are useless now. It won't be hard to find guns or food when 70% pop is dead. There's shelter in many abandoned homes, facilities, etc. Even if you stock up on supplies, you'll run out eventually, and you'll have to scavenge. The only threat to your survival now are humans, hunger, and thirst. This is your life now. It's not some temporary phase you gotta make it through. 

FOTS said: 

Slay said: 

I do agree we should kill those who'd jeopardize the group

 Agreed.

Another huge issue. We have too many leader type people.  I dont want to be butting heads with 6 other people who have leader oriented personalities. The arguing gets nowhere.

 

People that would hold down the group and should be killed:

Aub

Cs

Jim and cawk (sorry dudes, you would be helpful but you'd tear apart the group on purpose)

Sugar (similar reason)

Med (you're a danger to yourself)

 I don't think it'll be a butting head constantly type of thing. Over time, the person who gets listened to most will passively be seen as the leader. Still they can be contested and probably will. Though in these scenarios I reckon it's not like the movies or shows. Especially among our kind of people, we'd probably see a lot of them doing their own thing. 

I think at first a lot of those people you mentioned will conform as their will to survive will overpower their dysfunctions. Though as they get more comfortable and relaxed with the whole world falling apart their pettiness will rise. I would want to kill some of those listed above or vanish them, but there'd need to be rules otherwise it's chaos. You can't just do whatever the fuck you want when you want to. 

I think that kind of freedom is something you'll see more online but I'm willing to bet these people aren't that extreme in real life. Because for one, there is real threat, they can't hide behind the pc screen. 

---

Slay said: 

FOTS said: 

Slay said: 

I do agree we should kill those who'd jeopardize the group

 Agreed.

Another huge issue. We have too many leader type people.  I dont want to be butting heads with 6 other people who have leader oriented personalities. The arguing gets nowhere.

 

People that would hold down the group and should be killed:

Aub

Cs

Jim and cawk (sorry dudes, you would be helpful but you'd tear apart the group on purpose)

Sugar (similar reason)

Med (you're a danger to yourself)

 I don't think it'll be a butting head constantly type of thing. Over time, the person who gets listened to most will passively be seen as the leader. Still they can be contested and probably will. Though in these scenarios I reckon it's not like the movies or shows. Especially among our kind of people, we'd probably see a lot of them doing their own thing. 

I think at first a lot of those people you mentioned will conform as their will to survive will overpower their dysfunctions. Though as they get more comfortable and relaxed with the whole world falling apart their pettiness will rise. I would want to kill some of those listed above or vanish them, but there'd need to be rules otherwise it's chaos. You can't just do whatever the fuck you want when you want to. 

I think that kind of freedom is something you'll see more online but I'm willing to bet these people aren't that extreme in real life. Because for one, there is real threat, they can't hide behind the pc screen. 

 

 That's pretty much why I cant speak to the actual group dynamic, we mostly dont know each other in person

Best bet on survival is probably Texas, there are tons of apacolypse supply stocks, and heavily armed communities are sure to pop up

I would sell a cure for coronavirus for bitcoins on reddit

Slay said: 

I think most ppl here aren't on meds bro. 

Should they be though? 

I doubt guns would be hard to find

I'd be more concerned about ammo.