Sociopath Community

 Oh man, this is getting cringy.

Legga said: 

By your own stance, attach convincing proof of their nationality, which I can verify, that has also piled up "consistently" over the course of the forum years. Be reminded that you don't accept crowd vote.

Now I see why you think I contradicted myself; you've been duped by your own strawman. I never said I didn't accept or factor in a crowd vote, nor did I say I needed such "convincing proof" that I was practically asking for doxes. All I asked you to do was to back up your claims with rudimentary reasoning, which you clearly struggle with.

So, again, let's take Ed as an example: why do you think he's Swedish? Be reminded that he's never spoken or written any Swedish, he's never said he's Swedish and there's no reputation of him being Swedish. He has claimed to be Scandinavian but that could just as easily mean he's Danish or Norwegian. In fact, in the one pic he did share I believe he's wearing a Danish brand hoodie.

 Yes, please give me the full list of Swedish members (both past and present), it will allow me to demonstrate your stupidity in better clarity since you clearly didn't understand why you're forced to contradict yourself.

• Inquirer
• SensitiveSoul
• Missy
• Cadaver
• Animerat
• Deliciae
• MangoTiddies
• Obsidian

All of these people have claimed to be Swedish, shown they can read/write in Swedish well beyond Google Translate-level (apart from Mango) and have displayed an intimate knowledge of Sweden. You've heard my and Sensy's accent yourself, and both Missy and Ani have participated in VCs and made vocaroos. Cadaver was doxed.

Unfortunately you can't verify most of this because Luna deleted the old database, but other members should be able to verify most of what I say.

Legga said: 

Inquirer said: 

Why would I be "egged" when you're so desperate you have to resort to lying about post times and upvote your own post with socks?

Lmao the fuck are you even talking about? This is hilarious.

You consistently mix up time zones and think Sweden is one hour later than it is. You also upvoted your own posts with Daniel Birdick and Dean.

I thought you might try to squirm your way out by claiming you said something different. Inquirer: "Provide evidence for all the claims of the nationality of these 7 accounts."

In your own words: Please provide evidence.

Can you or can you not? And be sure to make it that the evidence provides proof each person has been Swedish "consistently". Do you want me to literally go and quote you on that too?

You know what is cringy? That after 5+ years of consistently pretending to be a wallflower you try to pull some alpha bravado.

Also, who the fuck is Dean? Daniel Birdick is not me you clown.

Legga said: 

I thought you might try to squirm your way out. Inquirer: "Provide evidence for all the claims of the nationality of these 7 accounts." In your own words: Please provide evidence. Can you or can you not? You know what is cringy? That after 5+ years of consistently pretending to be a wallflower you try to pull some alpha bravado.

"Evidence: one or more reasons for believing that something is or is not true" - Cambridge English Dictionary

I gave plenty of reasonable reasons for each of the people I listed as Swedes. All I ever asked you of was to give me similar reasoning in return, but you can't. You can't even answer my questions about Ed.

Perhaps if you stopped trying so hard to character assassinate me you'd perform better in the actual discussion?

Legga said: 

Also, who the fuck is Dean? Daniel Birdick is not me you clown.

 Why is that statistics paper published under the name Daniel Birdick then?

Legga said: 

Also, who the fuck is Dean? Daniel Birdick is not me you clown.

Oh, so you didn't post this article?

"Authors: Daniel Birdick

I statistically prove that Inquirer is lying. I refute his claim that there are 6 swedes on SC in favour of my own claim that there are 2-3, at a Bayes factor of 185. Moreover, by straightforward analysis, I show that Inq's claim can be generally ruled out at 95% confidence. QED."

Edit: User22 beat me to it.

user22212 said:

Legga said: 

Also, who the fuck is Dean? Daniel Birdick is not me you clown.

 Why is that statistics paper published under the name Daniel Birdick then?

 It's a joke, I like the guy.

Inquirer said:

"Evidence: one or more reasons for believing that something is or is not true" - Cambridge English Dictionary

I gave plenty of reasonable reasons for each of the people I listed as Swedes.

Any anecdotal evidence is ok, without you being able to verify it?

In that case, I can claim that all of those people have talked Swedish, understood Swedish, claimed they were Swedish, at one point.

The issue with evidence that is not verifiable is that I have no strong reason to believe it, and this is why generally speaking, when people ask for evidence, they mean something that you can actually trust.

How about we take the scientific approach? We all believe in science.

Perhaps if you stopped trying so hard to character assassinate me (..)

For someone who's been calling me an "idiot" and a "mindless troll" for the last 10+ posts, it sure is ironic that now you're whining. What did you expect?

But alright, I'm growing tired of this, so I won't insult you. Xadem was right, this started off as a joke, but now it's an ego thing. This is just childish.

Legga said: 

Any anecdotal evidence is ok, without you being able to verify it?

In that case, I can claim that all of those people have talked Swedish, understood Swedish, claimed they were Swedish, at one point.

The issue with evidence that is not verifiable is that I have no strong reason to believe it, and this is why generally speaking, when people ask for evidence, they mean something that you can actually trust.

How about we take the scientific approach? We all believe in science.

Now you're pushing this false dichotomy where either any evidence must be acceptable or we have to treat them all strictly scientifically. Read my posts again and you'll find that I ask for reasonable evidence/reasoning. Nothing more.

I will never be able to satisfy you that someone is who they say they are unless I dox them, if even that is enough for you. You haven't even commented on the fact that a Swedish person you didn't even account for (an extra Swede!) has actually been doxed and shown to be Swedish. You also don't consider Sensy and I talking in a Skype call at the same time to be enough so how could I possibly persuade you? What would it actually take for you to be convinced?

For someone who's been calling me an "idiot" and a "mindless troll" for the last 10+ posts, it sure is ironic that now you're whining. What did you expect?

I'm not whining, I'm making fun of you. You started the name calling and spend far more time doing it than I. You write paragraphs while I write sentences. I think it's pretty clear who's losing the argument.

But alright, I'm growing tired of this, so I won't insult you. Xadem was right, this started off as a joke, but now it's an ego thing. This is just childish.

Lol, it was childish from the start. You're free to admit defeat anytime.

I'd still like you to answer my question about why you think Ed is Swedish though. I think your struggle will be illuminating.