Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 41 posts
Posts: 4371
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...
Edvard said: 

and this is what keeps me going.

 lol

Posts: 4371
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

A lot of people dish out shit, then they get upset when Ed does the same.

Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

The real question is why is Edvard so desperately a Primal fan boy?

 Pedovard and Primal were close friends on the old S-C, hence his efforts. They were siblings in arm in bullying underaged teenagers into suicide, etc. Nobody else really liked Primal enough to stick up for her nowadays except him.

 

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...
Sturm88 said: 

Oh Ed, the only reason the lawsuit gems thread exists is because you keep pushing for ‘answers’, and making threads saying “there’s no lawsuit”. We were saying nothing. You keep whining for answers, then you whine when anything is given lol You just like to whine. 

You’re being used like a fool by Primal. If you wanted silence on the topic, you would stop bringing it up, yet you make threads over it and bitch constantly.. then expect us to give you answers while also not talking about it. It can’t be both ways. It seems you’re saying “Only I should get to post about the Primal/Sturm/Good saga. No one else can post back to me in reference to what I post. Omg you guys are such dictators!”

 

 I don't want the topic silenced, you do. Since, you know, you silence Primal's half of it.

There is no lawsuit, and you convinced Meta that there is. Which is hilarious.

Also, LMAO at all these PF puppets showing up to be a part of this. It is like a fucking rat infestation here.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 141
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

Okay, Ed. 

I suspect it's your fellow SCers creating those puppets though lol 

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

Posted Image

Well, since all of Primal's lines have been deleted, I guess no one can delete this now :D

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 738
2 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

hilarious how ed suddenly cares about free speech now, when luna was banning left and right and campaigned for banning people saying so much so as "legalize childrape" he wants to bring a woman back who regularly made fun of users abuse when they were children just get fucked you hypocritical cunt

Posts: 738
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...

sorry im being mean

Posts: 749
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...
TPG said: 

hilarious how ed suddenly cares about free speech now, when luna was banning left and right and campaigned for banning people saying so much so as "legalize childrape" he wants to bring a woman back who regularly made fun of users abuse when they were children just get fucked you hypocritical cunt

It is not about free speech, it is about taking away from the community. Making fun of user's abuse is part of SC. If you want a fucking safe space, move over to PF and MHG, moderated by these thin skinned losers.

I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Posts: 1511
0 votes RE: Why are Meta and Sturm ...
Edvard said: 
TPG said: 

hilarious how ed suddenly cares about free speech now, when luna was banning left and right and campaigned for banning people saying so much so as "legalize childrape" he wants to bring a woman back who regularly made fun of users abuse when they were children just get fucked you hypocritical cunt

It is not about free speech, it is about taking away from the community. Making fun of user's abuse is part of SC. If you want a fucking safe space, move over to PF and MHG, moderated by these thin skinned losers.

 nice projection, you clearly couldnt take the "legalize childrape" hence you banned for it lol

10 / 41 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.