Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Turncoat said: 

If you had to guess, which would you say are your top 3, and what do you think led to those being yours? 

Do you have areas in this chart that you think might be lacking in, or is there a sort of intelligence that you figure this chart doesn't cover? 

 I've met some very smart people that can't change a flat tire. So I think there is some truth to areas of intelligence.

Intra-personal and linguistic are areas I can work on. I'm pretty good at most of the others. logical-mathematics, interpersonal and bodily kin. are my strong areas. Nature and music are hobbies, so i guess im pretty well rounded. Cool image.

I remember seeing this several years back and it had much fewer areas. As far as other areas, I'm going to have to think about that one.

BohemianRhapsody said: 

Both self reports and analysis of another person is subject to biases. Go along this line of thinking and at the end of it, every thought that could be valid and is subject to variety among people would not be worth anything because at that point due to our inherent biases you could only say something absolutely objective is a legitimate thought, and therefore only mathematical/logical intelligence would be valued so we'd end up like a society of Vulcans. Do we really want this? If not, then sometimes biased thoughts should be given some value be it regarding yourself or others.

You can assign a degree of confidence to your subjective beliefs so that you get a scale of subjective vs objective in the sense that I or you understand it.

It's nice how you end up with a society of Vulcans from the innocent suggestion (which, let's be honest, I made provocatively) that self-reports tend to be subjective. I love it.